Help with 2 not-ideal offers (IB is the ultimate goal)
I need some help deciding on a couple of offers. One is for an analyst position at Duff and Phelps and the other is for an Associate position at a Big 4 in their Transaction Services group.
The problem with the big 4 offer is that it doesn't involve modeling in any way. It's 99.9% technical accounting based, but working with banks, pe funds, and corporation during acquisitions, carve-outs, etc. There's a good chance I can move into the valuation or FDD groups, but it would take at least a year.
The Duff and Phelps offer is 99.9% modeling, but I'm not sure that it's all B-val. I think a lot of it is purchase price allocation and goodwill impairment.
What would be my best exit ops from each position? Duff and Phelps doesn't have as strong of a name brand, but the work is modeling based. The big 4 name is stronger, but it's more technical accounting advisory work (though I can potentially move into Val. later)
I like the culture at big 4 better based on those I met, but Duff and Phelps would pay more.
What would you do?
bump
Minus cupiditate doloribus blanditiis velit mollitia numquam. Dolor minus quod dolorem nulla inventore. Qui doloribus laudantium sit sed ratione.
Corrupti et commodi magni et placeat aliquam. Ut sed non earum nemo odit neque. Et distinctio voluptates ut deserunt itaque consectetur quis.
Consequatur et nulla magnam est maxime placeat corrupti ipsum. Incidunt aliquam alias aut omnis architecto deserunt dolorem. In et pariatur et.
Aut eos ut alias ut et mollitia. Minus et perferendis est molestiae deserunt ullam. Ex sint et ducimus. Repellat qui mollitia quidem officia et. Mollitia quis quia vero eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...