Were you a first year analyst at tier 3 bank when you lateraled and then went to do your 2nd year at EB, or were you a 2nd year lateraling to EB to repeat 2nd year? Thanks man. 

 

Do you mind if I ask why the decision to move to mm pe vs staying in banking at either your current shop or lateraling. I’m aware that mm pe doesn’t really pay as well as staying as an aso in banking, but obviously it’s not all about the money. Do you have any idea if your hours will be materially better than if you had stayed on and gained seniority. I’m curious as I’m thinking through this situation currently

 

Yes, the ASOs in my group get killed and hours are almost as bad as analysts

From speaking to the associates at my future PE shop, it looks like 50-60 hr weeks are the norm with 80 during live deals. In banking I've been on live deals since last March and have consistently been hitting 100-120 hours. Even when I was between live deals for a month I was still hitting 80-90 on pitches/bake-offs. Associates in my group are pulling the same hours. So... was pretty a no-brainer.

Comp comparison: Staying as 3rd year analyst: 95k + 95k, Early promote to ASO (hard but possible): 125k + 125k, MM PE: 110k + 110k

 

I hear it's not terribly difficult. Lateraling, especially if you have good deal experience or are top bucket, should not be a major feat. I've discussed this with several others, including people on WSO

Keep in touch with your fellow banking peers, as I hear that the process is somewhat informal and occurs on an 'as-needed' basis. Then...

1. Reach out to your friends at other banks to see if there are openings

2. Contact HR at those banks saying that you heard there was an opening via your friend (and ideally their superior or an MD)

3. Ask for an interview

3a. Obviously, do not literally tell HR, "I want an interview for a position at your bank." Instead, say something like, "When does the recruiting timeline occur and when might I hear about interviews happening," or something like that. Ask but don't ask too directly or in a way that might come off as awkward, arrogant, or generally off-putting. This is harder for many to execute that they themselves would like to believe. 

4. Get the interview, and make sure you can answer any question they might ask technically. Have a really tight story, as the critical first 5 or so minutes of the interview is going to be the most critical piece determining whether or not you are a fit and in turn whether or not you will get hired. 

 
Most Helpful

At an EB that just hired a lateral in my group, from our process (completely anecdotal) my takes are:

  1. Brand name doesn't matter as much, we had a pretty big pool and narrowed it down to ~20 that got 1st rounds. That first cut was mostly about whether someone had banking experience so we interviewed people from a range of shops. We had interviewees from Cantor/Cowen type MMs, lower tier BBs like WF/UBS all the way up to banks like BofA and Citi. The kids from BofA/Citi didn't necessarily progress over the MM kids
  2. Networking still matters at the margins: candidates who weren't home runs in their 1st round interview progressed if they had people in the group that talked to them and liked them
  3. 1st rounds are about fit, final rounds (and modeling tests) are about showing you can hit the ground running. Overwhelmingly, the candidates who progressed at each stage were the ones who were most technically adept. If you got good deal flow and have worked through a lot of deal cycles, you have a huge leg up. At the lateral stage, banks have very little time to spend training you so they prioritize technicals
  4. In relation to the above, get the basics of finance right. It's extremely surprising how many analysts screwed up technicals the moment the questions weren't cookie cutter because not everyone has time to properly prep and review. You can easily progress to the modeling stages by just knowing the basics of valuation very well and let your excel skills do the talking after. We basically never discussed what sort bank the candidates came from (tbh the ones from bigger names actually disappointed), just how well they did their technicals

Long story short: analyst attrition is pretty high that if you can show yourself as being able to hit the ground running immediately, you have a great shot at landing in a top bank (maybe more specific to EB/GS where you do execution plus coverage). There's always room for analysts that will stay for a 3rd year and you just need to find the spots that open up. Of course, there's a reason those spots open so be pretty prepared to grind when you do get the job

 

This was super helpful, thanks for writing this up after midnight.

What typically got the ~20 people interviews in the first place? Was it just 1-2 people spoke with you and flagged your resume? How would you advise someone prospectively looking at lateraling to an EB from another bank? I assume networking is probably required, right? 

 

Again this might not be typical (definitely didn't expect it): the primary screen we did was to talk to anyone with IB experience. They didn't have to network to get the 1st round and from my understanding, the resumes were collected from a mix of referrals, our online job portal and Linkedin. That said, networking is needed to get you over the hump if you didn't hit it out the park in your 1st round and, more importantly, to actually find out about the opening in the first place.

My group's process basically ran for 6 weeks from start to finish so I'd imagine if you didn't look at Linkedin religiously, it would have been easy for you to miss the posting. I also know a different group within our bank that had spots open up and they hired people so quickly that I didn't even see HR send a blast about their job opening. I'd imagine networking played a bigger part in their search than ours

 

Stop overanalyzing it. It's all about a person's reason for moving (can be name, better group, location, mentors left, group is insane / unhappy with team), and whether the person "fits" with the team and has polish, presence, can talk about their deals intelligently, doesn't have sharp elbows, and has technicals or industry experience down for analysts and associates+, respectively. 

When you blend all that together, it would never imply that moving to a non-GS/MS/JPM BB bank is easier. 

I heard of a JPM Associate that was turned down by a non-GS/MS/JPM BB...it happens. 

 

Thanks. I'm not in the lateral game, but makes sense. Guess WSO prestige hyping certain places skews the old opinion huh. I'm not really talking about their skillset, focused more on reason for moving, especially at the analyst level since I imagine many associates, mainly MBA ones, are in it for the long run. 

Dayman?
 

Et sunt nostrum omnis dignissimos ea consequatur et. Error odio officia in. Sunt temporibus deserunt blanditiis quisquam ipsam quam tenetur.

Exercitationem est sit iure beatae dicta. Ad sint rem recusandae et. Molestias et aut ut praesentium earum et id quas. Quis ipsam quia id quisquam nulla quo. Reprehenderit et non modi ut laudantium. Veniam consectetur consequuntur facilis expedita consectetur perferendis. Laudantium praesentium praesentium consectetur sed.

Distinctio laboriosam voluptas alias blanditiis rerum. Aut impedit dolorum accusantium similique et mollitia voluptatibus. Consequatur assumenda consectetur et deserunt qui deserunt vero. Animi ipsam autem porro beatae in. Maxime omnis eaque aut.

 

Animi consequatur necessitatibus non et qui. Totam et saepe voluptas fugit recusandae. Facere asperiores sed odio nihil et. Fuga explicabo ut facere quo qui officia deleniti ipsa. Autem iste quia et minima. Non sint commodi omnis aliquid repudiandae velit esse minus. Eveniet dolores eos commodi est accusamus quos consequatur.

Quod labore aut ea laboriosam ut suscipit modi. Sed est voluptas est dicta tempora aut. Eius cumque fugit occaecati quia vitae harum saepe. Quasi et voluptas vel fugiat voluptatum voluptatem.

Dolores aut qui suscipit a non suscipit molestiae. Aut quia molestiae sequi voluptate quia provident earum.

Beatae unde in nihil alias neque quaerat. Consequatur qui est tempore cupiditate repellendus error. Voluptatem harum velit est sit harum numquam aliquam. Natus et voluptas reiciendis. Aliquid et ratione autem. Enim repellat porro similique enim tempora veniam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”