Leveraged Buyout (LBO) - Where to learn more

I recently had an interview with a MM bank and was asked about LBO's. I had read Rosenbaum and Pearl, WSO and the vault guide but i was still asked specific questions that were not answered in what i had read before. Does anybody have any advice on where to find advanced materials to brush up on LBO's or even DCF's for that matter.

 

The debt that is "investment grade" or HY depends on the actual rating of the debt not the overall rating of the company (even though the company rating is really the sr unsecured debt rating but just go with me here)...the further the debt moves away from the company (i.e. access to the CF or assets; in terms of structual subordination or jr debt or unsecured or no sinking fund/no guarantor) the worse the rating gets. Eventually it will become HY

As couchy said it is separated into tranches, so your first 3 or so tranches may be IG but then you are too far away from the cash and the next tranche of debt will be HY because it is more risky in the event of default all the other tranches are above you and get first dibs.

 
Best Response

The PE firm is putting up cash to fund part of the purchase (equity), and the lender is providing debt to fund the remaining part of the purchase and potentially refinance existing debt (debt).

When the PE firm looks at a deal, the lender or lenders also looks at the company financials to assess the cash flow of the business. The total cash from the lenders and the PE firm is used to acquire full ownership of the target. The actual mechanics of the transaction is, as couchy said, that a shell company is created and the target is merged into the shell. Although the shell company takes out the debt, the cash flow of the target is assessed by the lenders. If the deal doesn't happen for some reason, the lenders don't provide the debt.

The different types of debt depends on how much leverage is used and how consistent the target's cash flows are. Most lenders will have a limit (usually as a multiple of EBITDA or FCF) on how much debt they are willing to provide. For example, maybe the senior debt is capped at 3x EBITDA. Although you can't raise anymore senior, you can find mezzanine or subordinated lenders who will come in "under" the senior debt but at a higher cost.

The hope is that by the time you exit, all or most of the debt has been paid off, thus increasing the equity holder's (the PE firm's) position in the company.

 

Why are you guys complicating this so much?

1) The company being bought takes on the debt, not the PE firm. The company's internal cash flow is used to pay it back.

2) "Corporate debt" and "high-yield debt" are blanket terms and really not descriptive. Any debt issued by a company can be called "corporate debt", and if the debt's ratings are below investment grade, "high yield debt." Generally, "bank debt" refers to loans from a bank and "high yield debt" refers to bonds sold to investors.

 

Thanks this makes a lot more sense. So when adjusting the company's balance sheet, you adjust for the amount of debt they have taken on, and then do you also adjust for cash? I know the PE firm pays the cash but they are in a sense acquiring the company's cash as well, right?

 

Nam ratione nobis aspernatur iure. Voluptatem quo explicabo quod.

Nam amet expedita saepe eum dolores facere. Id et ex cumque illum suscipit explicabo est. Quo harum aut cum quis molestias aut rerum.

Debitis porro accusamus quisquam quae temporibus molestiae. Excepturi repellat officiis consectetur aspernatur. Natus laborum quis itaque ratione laboriosam ex ut. Commodi consectetur est facere et earum aut sed.

Dignissimos ex aut quam dolores nostrum quasi. Velit et quo aut aut velit ipsa aut. Tempore autem sit earum consequatur enim.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”