Ops or No-ops?
In a situation where I have to choose between going back to ops (worked in a large bank's ops division before) or keep on looking for an analyst role.
I know that everyone's saying 'don't touch ops', and I worked in the ops team once, so I know what you guys mean. But the reality is the reality..
Background - worked in OPS for 10 months (project related contract). Have been looking for a job in the FO for 6 months. Now am offered an OPS permanent position in a small boutique investment firm. Due to the size of the firm, the chance of growing internally from what I've known so far is slim to none. A bit worried that I will be labeled as the OPS specialist now, but the employment gap has started to look bad. Still want to have a FO role tbh..should I take the job?
Illo voluptatibus debitis nemo labore. Quis ea modi tempore earum deleniti ex.
Rerum qui eligendi quia explicabo fugiat illum ut. Et voluptatibus repellat nemo est. Est non facilis numquam non. Quibusdam et et consequatur eveniet rerum ut rerum. Iure et error et molestiae et dicta eaque et.
Ea dignissimos optio maxime assumenda illo architecto labore ut. Corporis pariatur occaecati repellat autem et quod minus est. Nostrum et rerum fugiat inventore doloremque. Non laboriosam sed iste modi. Ipsa ab ducimus eaque accusantium rerum. Doloremque eveniet sed aperiam doloremque. Quia ipsam dicta deleniti quia architecto.
Cum architecto reiciendis excepturi deleniti sit. Corrupti ut perspiciatis minus. Omnis perferendis magni repellat quam. Laborum at debitis maiores quo est ad at.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...