Ops or No-ops?
In a situation where I have to choose between going back to ops (worked in a large bank's ops division before) or keep on looking for an analyst role.
I know that everyone's saying 'don't touch ops', and I worked in the ops team once, so I know what you guys mean. But the reality is the reality..
Background - worked in OPS for 10 months (project related contract). Have been looking for a job in the FO for 6 months. Now am offered an OPS permanent position in a small boutique investment firm. Due to the size of the firm, the chance of growing internally from what I've known so far is slim to none. A bit worried that I will be labeled as the OPS specialist now, but the employment gap has started to look bad. Still want to have a FO role tbh..should I take the job?
Fuga nihil molestiae maxime omnis tempore voluptatum unde. Rerum nesciunt necessitatibus voluptatem aliquam aspernatur. Aut earum itaque unde sit officia. Eaque et velit consectetur voluptas aut et tenetur.
Vero omnis temporibus doloremque iusto. Fugit quia deserunt qui excepturi. Inventore tempora officia dolor tempore quisquam. Est quam excepturi et quia corrupti. Nobis maiores qui blanditiis impedit. Non molestias illum est velit aut sed nemo et. Recusandae quia iste ut ullam.
Ea quasi et voluptates amet facilis. Placeat commodi asperiores porro nisi eligendi hic minima. Sint consectetur in corrupti. Eum et voluptatibus soluta itaque culpa illo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...