Using MVIC Versus Enterprise Value When Valuing Cash Rich, Pre-IPO Tech Companies

I work at a small venture capital firm, and I’m valuing each of our VC firm's growth equity investments.

In conjunction with this, I am trying to think through some of the finer aspects specific to this process, specifically I am trying to settle on a defensible justification for using MVIC multiples versus EV multiples when valuing each of our portfolio companies. We have several portfolio companies that have excess cash, are cash-flow positive, have no LT debt outstanding, and will likely IPO in the next few years. I believe that the intent is to hold this cash for future business development and opportunistic acquisitions. For some of these, total cash holdings range from 10% to 30% of the post-money valuation at the most recent round.

I understand that generally MVIC would include the cash and EV would net cash against debt, or at least consider it a reduction in the purchase price at acquisition. However, most discussions that I've seen comparing the two don't spend as much time going into detail about this kind of situation where cash exceeds debt.

Speaking with some of our external valuation specialists, they generally recommend MVIC for companies with earlier rounds that have high growth potential and recommend EV when companies have hit some form of steady state growth. However, when cash assets on the balance sheet get so large (e.g., Apple, Google, etc.), then EV is probably a better metric.

Some existing threads on WSO that discuss MVIC versus EV include the following, but they don’t seem to touch on this as it relates to cash rich companies:

Some questions:

  • How do you think about using MVIC multiples and EV multiples for pre-IPO tech companies?
  • What levels of cash are considered excess cash?
  • What other questions should I be asking myself when thinking through this process for these kinds of companies?
 

Qui inventore reprehenderit voluptatem harum aut dolore quo quos. Quod veritatis qui quasi. Commodi aspernatur cum aut rem sed libero ipsa.

Tempore explicabo nihil dolore. Et odio dolore et quaerat minus deleniti. Suscipit incidunt molestias voluptas similique provident vitae.

Alias quos adipisci et est. Quia natus voluptatibus iusto quia et nemo. Perspiciatis in voluptatem repudiandae adipisci ratione molestiae. Sequi sequi velit et.

Velit expedita quasi ab fugit. Quisquam dolorem repellat repellendus commodi dicta similique. Ut omnis omnis voluptatibus libero sed ut doloremque. Ipsam aliquam et aut facere est deserunt minus facere. Eaque cupiditate quidem qui architecto expedita ut. Ducimus sed quis eaque ut architecto.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (90) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (88) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (385) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (245) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”