Definitely. Pretty much everything we do is because that is how our MDs were taught so that's how we do things and the cycle continues on and on even though there are much better ways of running a deal process. In my opinion building a 60+ page CIM/PPM is the biggest waste of time, just give potential buyers a well built model and maybe 10 pages of content and skip over the month of building a giant book that most people don't even read.

 
Most Helpful

Having left IB Coverage and moved on to industry where I now get pitched by banks every now and then... the primary area "average" bankers lack is operational understanding of certain businesses. The good bankers have a general sense and don't ask dumb questions. The absolute beast bankers (MD's i've had the honor of working with and even an MD or 2 that have pitched me now) know your business inside out like you know it yourself as the owner operator. Those bankers make you TRUST that they know what they're doing.

Average to below average bankers view a buy or sell-side as a "process". In fact that's what they call it lmao. It works because it generates fees if they run the volume of deals up but when the deals get complex enough they're weakness in cookie cutter approaches gets shown.

^^ All this is senior banker stuff. From a junior perspective, I'd say it's actually the opposite and trying to go too "big picture" as most generic advice states and not actually getting the technicals down. When you leave as an analyst, I'm not looking to hire someone who has MD level skills in sales or client presentation. I want someone who knows accounting and  finance  like they know english. The other stuff can only be learned over time. 

 

Poor precedent transactions or public comps universe selection. That's the quickest one without giving specifics away. 

I'll see a company i'm intimately familiar with (as in they're my damn customer and I interact with them on a day to day basis) and realize immediately it's not a comp and ask why it's included. 

MD falters a bit and says we're in the same product sphere and sell the same thing. I remind him I'm in manufacturing and they're in distribution. I was never an all star banker but from my time there and even a preschooler should know those 2 companies don't trade on the same multiples.

 

They overestimate how smart they are and underestimate how hard it is to build a business and operate it.

"Oh you're growing through M&A? You are paying 5-6x for your deals? You should be looking for value deals at 3-4x and look for synergies in your deals. I think you should renegotiate your current deals to a lower multiple."

Yeah go try and get an entrepreneur to sign an LOI dipshit spreadsheet monkey.

 

takenotes08

They overestimate how smart they are and underestimate how hard it is to build a business and operate it.

"Oh you're growing through M&A? You are paying 5-6x for your deals? You should be looking for value deals at 3-4x and look for synergies in your deals. I think you should renegotiate your current deals to a lower multiple."

Yeah go try and get an entrepreneur to sign an LOI dipshit spreadsheet monkey.

Gotta pump those multiples up, those are rookie numbers

 

The ability to step back and think about the target audience for the memorandum, curating the narrative, upside story and points that drive value instead of just data population. This would fall under creativity but is likely more of an experience issue. 

 

This right here. Luckily I learned this early when tackling a CIM

 

As arbiters of company valuations and experts on company business models, bankers can't run their own firms effectively. I'm surprised there aren't activist campaigns against publicly traded banks.

 

Often times it's deep knowledge about a client or industry. I've seen when the mentality becomes so transaction-focused, bankers often overlook properly grasping a business or who would be a good buyer / target from a strategic fit standpoint. Yes, for sell-sides they can tier buyers by fit or priority for example but I've noticed that many times the "strategic rationale" is flawed and only makes sense at a glance rather than actually meeting the needs of management. 

I've also seen that clients or potential clients can often get turned off by the very idea of speaking with bankers given the conversations are often driven by bankers making fee-generating suggestions one after another. I think some of the best bankers really embrace the trusted advisor role and know when it's time to engage in actual transactional dialogue vs when a CEO/CFO is seeking general or strategic counsel.

 

Nobis et provident veritatis quo laudantium blanditiis. Iusto quibusdam debitis ad quos corrupti. Eos et quisquam dignissimos cumque ut accusantium.

Labore ut sed sunt deleniti qui sint. Odio possimus aliquam reprehenderit ut magni sit et.

Beatae velit asperiores ut omnis error voluptatem minus. Corporis rerum harum eius. Hic ea corrupti inventore quam ut. Corrupti quia commodi reprehenderit vel vero dolor ea fuga. Et autem rerum minus et sapiente assumenda.

Beatae ab itaque nemo explicabo et odit. Voluptatem neque neque sunt vel atque. Incidunt quibusdam rerum rerum corrupti.

 

Ratione corrupti minus quis eaque reiciendis. Officia consectetur a alias velit ea quo consequatur. Amet voluptatem illo vel eius repellat sed. Rerum tenetur corrupti enim et eum nemo suscipit.

Rerum delectus assumenda sapiente exercitationem explicabo in maiores odio. Culpa non officia est quidem. Nam inventore est et id. Placeat deserunt autem et et odio deserunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”