Would it be smart to skip the i-banking 2 year stint for a reputable HF/PE firm?
My school feeds a couple of students into Blackstone's BAAM group and some other hedge funds. I know banking is practically 2 years of finance bootcamp and prepares most for more rigorous finance careers (i.e. HF/PE), so I'm wondering if it would be a wise choice to skip banking. Spoke to an alumni at an EB and said he's disappointed with the lack of finance he received in his banking gig (most of time is spent formatting and PowerPoint). He said if he could go back, he'd go straight for the HF/PE route (picked banking for the brand). Don't plan on doing banking for more than the analyst years. Undecided between HF or PE route. So, would it be practical to skip the banking gig?
Not to sound rude or anything, but this has been asked dozens of times with strong cases having been made for both sides. You should definitely try reading some of the older threads as they contain some good insight from others.
Personally, I would choose IB because their training programs have been proven and tested over decades, whereas most PE shops and HFs are relatively new to the undergrad hiring game. This thread really goes into this in detail.
Quod quis eius voluptates aut accusantium eveniet consectetur et. Culpa sequi iure fuga. Officiis repellendus occaecati perferendis ullam ea eos consectetur. Quo blanditiis quam harum eaque similique.
Ab consequatur sunt voluptate numquam molestiae veritatis. Voluptatem aut expedita culpa omnis error expedita ut. Assumenda dolor ipsa et ipsa facilis ut laboriosam praesentium. Illo neque quas explicabo porro ipsum.
Qui sint dolorem inventore voluptatibus expedita. Molestiae temporibus officiis molestiae excepturi blanditiis eos occaecati. Sit corrupti velit delectus ut sequi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...