Bear Stearns: what is going on?

Would you buy shares of Bear Stearns?
Yes/No? Why?
AP
JPMorgan Chase Funding Bear Stearns
Friday March 14, 10:08 am ET
By Stephen Bernard, AP Business Writer
JPMorgan Chase, With Federal Reserve Bank of NY, to Provide Funding to Bear Stearns
NEW YORK (AP) -- The federal government and JPMorgan Chase & Co. teamed up on a bailout of Bear Stearns Cos. on Friday, a last-ditch move to save the investment bank, which acknowledged its dire financial straits after a week of firm denials.
ADVERTISEMENT
Bear Stearns lost half of its value within 30 minutes of the market open.
While it was not clear exactly how much money Chase would pump into Bear, a person familiar with the bailout, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the talks are private, said Chase may end up buying Bear Stearns outright.
Bear Stearns said in a statement it is working with JPMorgan Chase to find permanent strategic alternatives to alleviate the liquidity problems, but could not guarantee they would be successful.
JPMorgan Chase is providing secured funding to Bear for 28 days, backstopped by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Bear Stearns and the Federal Reserve approached JPMorgan Chase about the financing and a potential deal, according to the source.
Rumors have persisted throughout the week that Bear Stearns was facing major liquidity problems, but the investment bank's chief executive initially denied those rumors.
"Bear Stearns has been the subject of a multitude of market rumors regarding our liquidity," Bear Stearns president and chief executive, Alan Schwartz, said in a statement. "Amidst this market chatter, our liquidity position in the last 24 hours had significantly deteriorated."
In a memo sent to employees, Schwartz said the temporary financing would allow the company to "get back to business as usual."
The company has struggled since the middle of 2007 due to the fallout in the mortgage and credit markets. Last summer, two hedge funds worth billions of dollars managed by Bear Stearns collapsed because of bad bets on securities backed by subprime mortgages -- loans given to customers with poor credit history.
JPMorgan Chase said the financing would not expose its company to any material risk.
Shares of JPMorgan Chase fell 5.4 percent.
The Federal Reserve has not yet released its own statement and did not immediately comment on the news.
AP Business Writers Madlen Read and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this Forum topic





To the OP - I have no clue -
To the OP - I have no clue - but seriously, as a SA with Bear, should I start contacting places I interviewed with previously?
its over
At the very least Bear is goign to face a long recovery. I think JPMC is relatively nice, but i still don't want to see what kind of conditions they put on that financing. If Bear Stearns survives, its gonna be third class for a while.
Buy shares? Tough call. Depends on whether you think shares are pricing in high probability of complete failure or not. If they are then i'd buy (if you think it'll make it). Personally though, wouldn't touch it with a pole.
WTF
Bear was insolvent a few hours ago.
Fed put pressure on JPMChase to bail BS out.
28 day reprive.
Most likely JPMC will buyout BS.
This is serious folks.
Look at all the financials.
Look at the friggin dollar.
History in the making.
Be glad you are young.
I don't think any one has a
I don't think any one has a good grasp on the intrinsic value of Bear's stock at the moment.
Long or short, I'd avoid taking any positions on the equity right now.
People still respect the
People still respect the franchise and it looks like the Fed is willing to try maintain liquidity and avoid systemic collapse. But ultimately, Bear's business model is broken and I'm not really seeing any light at the end of the tunnel
If you find out what
If you find out what incoming SAs should be doing, let me know. I'm in the same (sinking) boat as you....
This is ridiculous
The Fed needs to stop bailing out everyone. This is capitalism - winners come out on top and the losers go out of business.
history repeats====
The bail out plans are similar to the monetary policy prior to the depression.
It didn't work then.
i wouldn't want to be
i wouldn't want to be associated with bear at any level at this time. traders are being told not to deal with the bank. if you have ft/sa offers from bear, i would begin to make plans for the worst. it's really sad to see bear go down as it's a great firm with a unique culture. if jpm does end up buying bear, i'm not sure what good that would do for anyone...at least half of bear's employees would have to be fired because of redundancies. for bear, this is an absolutely shitty position to be in.
I'd say this sounds like a
I'd say this sounds like a late 90's Lehman scenario, but things actually seem far more dire.
LTCM comes to mind.
==
and it is not just bear.
agree with the many posters
agree with the many posters above. i will now remove my foot from my mouth after my post 3 days ago stating Bear wouldnt go under. seems like the most likely scenario is that bear will be bought
Avoid
I wouldn't do anything, long or short, right now.
For the SAs working there, I'm not even sure what to say. I don't think there's anything you can do currently beyond wait to see how it plays out... contacting other banks right now would probably not be a good move.
But I would start thinking about other options for the summer at the very least.
http://www.mergersandinquisitions.com/
Mergers & Inquisitions
Start interviewing
What should FT starts in '08 do at the moment? If they were to be bought out it would happen after the 28 days right?
Northern Rock
The Federal Reserve of NY is granting Morgan the funds it needs to bail out Bear Stearns, so here is America's Northern Rock...
Doesn't this suck for FT
Doesn't this suck for FT hires no matter what happens to Bear? If they survive, then the reputation will go to shit and there will likely be NO deal flow or confidence. If they go under, then we will be let go? Very sad time to part of Bear
wondering the same thing
im wondering the same, pogobanker...what exactly will happen to FT bear hires? if jpm or whoever else takes bear over, i doubt they will honor all the offers. they might shut some offices down, best case scenario move some people to their other offices.
Best (ideal) case scenario
Best (ideal) case scenario is that JPM buys Bear and then all the FT hires get shipped to JPM, but that's almost impossible since Bear's IBD isn't what Bear is known for, and the markets are doing so poorly, few banks would look to expand and grow in such a precarious economy. Not to mention, FT hires have little to no experience in banking, so why the heck would they hire them, when they have no deal experience.
Hopefully, we get 60K severance or something.
if bear goes bankrupt, we
if bear goes bankrupt, we are all screwed and i can see other banks going down too. but it won't happen, as i think a buyout will occur and the fed won't let the liquidity crisis get out of hand.
but yes, no matter what, it is not a good time to work at bear.
bought out = GG (good game)
bought out = GG (good game) for Bear Stearns FT hires
I don't see how Bear could possibly weather the storm, since the credit crisis and housing slump hasn't bottomed out yet.
What would you do?!
pogobanker...you are
pogobanker...you are absolutely wrong about buyout being a good thing for ft hires (or any bsc employee for that matter). if jpm buys bear, i assume more than half of bear's employees would be fired due to redundancies. and with the street looking to downsize like never before, it's going to be especially bad for bear. whatever happens, bear loses.
can some u guys explain why
can some u guys explain why bear stearns is in a liquidity crisis? and why other firms can also go thru this crisis?
GG = good game
GG = good game
GG means bad! It's a term used for gamers when they lose. People who lose say GG to the victors as a courtesy. GG = OWNED.
pogobanker, sorry if i
pogobanker, sorry if i misunderstood..."good game" just sounds like a positive term. it seems more appropriate to say GO as in "game over" for bear.
That's good too Game over!
That's good too
Game over!
slik vik, it's all about
slik vik, it's all about cash. spooked out clients withdrew funds from bear at a lethal rate, leaving bear with very little short term liquidity. this could happen to other banks...the market seems to suggest that lehman is next, although im not sure what the chances are.
a link ....
slik vik, it's all about cash. spooked out clients withdrew funds from bear at a lethal rate, leaving bear with very little short term liquidity. this could happen to other banks...the market seems to suggest that lehman is next, although im not sure what the chances are.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/bear-stearns-goes-life-support/sto...
Who do you think would buy
Who do you think would buy them?
BofA?
Wachovia?
JP Morgan?
hopefully not bofa or
hopefully not bofa or wachovia.
Why not those 2 banks? They
Why not those 2 banks?
They both want to be bigger players in banking (or did at one time at least)
Wachovia Stearns doesn't sound too bad
or Bank of Bear
Bear of America? how
Bear of America? how fitting...
BofA is pulling out like a
BofA is pulling out of IBD with the urgency of a dude about to bust his load. Don't really think they would be interested in buying out BSC.
If it's anyone, I would say a foreign bank. Maybe HSBC? I know they want to focus on Europe/Asia, but they have made some big IBD hires in the US recently, which points toward expansion.
I couldn't even imagine the
I couldn't even imagine the culture clash that would result from a foreign bank trying to acquire Bear Stearns. Watching their fratty, meathead, pro-America culture permeate throughout a foreign bank would be hilarious (I know its a rash overgeneralization, but it still cracks me up thinking about it).
why lehman
What makes you think lehman might be next? What about Merrill? I don't really have any inkling about why either of these should suffer btw, just curious.
What happens now to associates
If you're a summer associate going to Bear, already signed and everything, what's your best hope/course of action? has this happened to other s before?
dazedmonk...as i said, the
dazedmonk...as i said, the market suggested that lehman could be next. take a look at the stock performance of all the major banks today. there was much more pressure on leh because investors in general view leh as the closest thing to bsc....it's the next smallest us bb after bsc, has a similar biz model, and has experienced something similar in the 90s. i dont necessarily agree with all this but that's what the market implied today.
Can anyone compare Bear's
Can anyone compare Bear's current situation with Salomon Brothers before its merger with Citi?
Thanks.
summer analyst
im assuming that i shouldnt accept bear SA... even though my only other option would be corporate finance (not another wall street internship).
any thoughts on whether to accept or deny the offer? right now im leaning towards rejecting it..
"Lehman’s balance sheet is
"Lehman’s balance sheet is currently levered 40 times, with four times its capital in Liar Level (more formally, Level III) alleged assets, much of which (ahem) bear more than a passing resemblance to the garbage currently in the process of taking down 32-times levered Carlyle Capital."
from Naked Shorts
Too bad none of us are old
Too bad none of us are old enough to remember when Drexel went under. Would be interesting to compare the parallels. Of course the FT and SA classes were likely entering kindergarten or 1st grade when that happened.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drexel_Burnham_Lambert
not only would i not buy shares
i shorted some at the close. sadly shorted fannie at the open instead of bear or morgan.
to the guy a couple posts above me who says he wouldnt accept a summer position...are you retarded?
you think your reputation will be besmirched? lol. just start looking for other things, and if they're miraculously still in business this summer be glad
im not retarded
im not retarded, i just dont think i should accept because i dont have faith in bear anymore, and i think that even if it is around they will have a HUGELY damaged reputation. it would not affect my reputation obviously, but it makes the internship look less desirable and valuable on my resume. who knows if there would be things to do this summer even if they are still around.
i think i would be better off with an internship at GE, a very stable company with a great reputation.
i still havent made the decision yet, margincalling (or anyone else): please let me know if you have any advice?
depends really on what
depends really on what division you have been placed with Bear this summer?
what about Bear Prime
what about Bear Prime Brokerage? I am just afraid by the time summer rolls around that unit will not even exist anymore.
division
studentbanker: i have been placed with Bear Fixed Income
i've heard that
i've heard that clearing/primebrokerage is the only valuable unit at bsc right now. since a deal must be done quickly (i assume they're cooking something up at this time) jpm might buy the company entirely, keep the prime brokerage and sell off the rest. the problem is, the rest is probably worth close to nothing.
well if jpm buys their pb
well if jpm buys their pb unit than I won't have a job there...i would just be an intern and im sure there are a lot of redundancies within pb and a lot of people will get fired.
right now, nobody knows
right now, nobody knows what's going to happen to Bear. the Fed effectively gave them a month to conduct an orderly liquidation. whether they sell the entire business in one shot or sell off pieces or don't sell at all (and file chap 11) is anyone's guess right now. i'm sure they are pursuing all avenues as we speak. anyone with an offer or who has secured a position with Bear has every right to be anxious. I think that if you have other offers, you should consider taking them or at least try to hold off on making a decision and seeing what happens. If you've already accepted an offer, you can try interviewing elsewhere but it is going to be tough given the market. The best you can do is wait and see and hope for the best.
When I can also say is that regardless of who may buy Bear (assuming someone picks it up in its entirety), its impossible to know right now what jobs would stay and what jobs would go. Yes, JPM would likely eliminate more ibanking jobs than Wachovia but all anyone can do is wait and see. I wasn't around when Salomon or Drexel crashed and burned but I was around for some of the big bank mergers e.g. DLJ/CSFB. I know for a fact that it took many months after that deal was announced for management to figure out headcount and overlap issues. As tough as it is right now, all most of you can do is be patient and don't overanalyze any media speculation.
vballgrl88
vballgrl88, accept both offers if you prefer Fixed Income over Corp Fin in general. Then just pull out of GE if Bear recovers, or watch Bear sink with GE in hand. This assumes you're not concerned about burning bridges with GE in long term (i.e. full time hiring next year)
JPM's possibly buying Bear
JPM's possibly buying Bear for less than $20 a share!? Damnnnnn. I had heard that Dimon was a tough negotiator but ouch. Paying only 25% of book value...
http://seekingalpha.com/article/68708-j-p-morgan-on-verge-of-buying-bear...