Calling out boarding/prep school kids

For the people that went to these top boarding school especially in New England, is it incredibly easy(ier) to get into an elite university/ivy compared to a public school? Just looking at the college placements at some of these schools is insane.

 

It can be easier because the guidance departments can hook you up. However, I know that some elite towns/schools only get a few kids in at each ivy school, so they dont look gentrified, and very often its only the sports people who get in/people who are legacies, with valedictorians being denied.

“...all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Schopenhauer
 
seabird:
It can be easier because the guidance departments can hook you up. However, I know that some elite towns/schools only get a few kids in at each ivy school, so they dont look gentrified, and very often its only the sports people who get in/people who are legacies, with valedictorians being denied.
Really? I was looking at the college matriculation stats for some elite boarding schools, almost all of them place 1/3 of their graduating class into the ivy league. I can't help but think they have an insanely unfair advantage over everyone else. My friend went to a private school in Georgia and even their school inflate their GPA like crazy to help them get into college. I can't imagine anyone in the top 20% of their class at andover, exeter, cate, hotchkiss not getting into an Ivy with those stats let alone a valedictorian.
 

They place a lot, but from people I know who went to a top 5 public school (comparable to these schools due to their connections within the guidance depts, the fact that rich families move to this town specifically for the school quality/guidance dept quality and how people are recruited in to schools after), the big take aways are what I described.

The people are on average much brighter because of the quality of the school, and the work ethic their parents/teachers push on them/quality of the teachers. Aside from the bunch that goes to the ivy schools, a lot went to good liberal arts schools, and other top schools, but to get in to the top ivy schools you have to be a legacy or an athlete. I know a couple of athletes who are on academic probation though, while the valedictorian was denied from the ivies and is at a good school for what hes studying, but still not top 20. Its bullshit.

“...all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Schopenhauer
 

My university inflated my prep school gpa 16% just did it out. There are definitely feeder schools like Andover, Exeter, Deerfield. But outside that it definitely helps but its not like everyone gets into ivy/top tier schools. EVERYONE does get into a better school though than if they had the same stats at a public school, but you have to realize private school curriculum is at a much higher level than public schools anyway. The college counseling offices help a shit ton too, they know their shit and have connections.

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 

Of course it is easier but that is primarily because top prep schools act as another level of gatekeepers. For example, a school like Choate only accepts students who have already demonstrated a high level of aptitude and/or potential. Beyond the pure network, academic environment, and connections advantage that most elite private schools provide, they also provide instant credibility to those students who have demonstrated a certain level of proficiency because they are essentially designed to be feeder schools into top universities. Sure, some students may be able to buy or play (through athletics) their way into an elite prep school but the kids who get into the top universities from these schools have generally earned the right. Also, grade inflation has less of an impact in these schools than you would probably expect given the fact that applicants are judged on a wide range of credentials including standardized test scores and the fact that universities know what they are getting from these elite prep schools based on past experience with alumni.

 

I went to Deerfield and can clarify this. Deerfield and other elite boarding schools help you get into great schools that are just below the Ivy League (Northwestern, UChicago, Duke--I know people say it's ivy caliber, but everyone at Deerfield chooses ivy over Duke, even Cornell--Georgetown, etc.) If you have the same stats at Deerfield vs a random public school, you have a much better shot at these schools.

Ivy League not so much. The numbers are very misleading. Yes a 1/4 of the kids go to Ivy League schools but you have to keep in mind how ridiculous connected these kids are. For instance, in my graduating year, we had about 10 kids go to Harvard. Out of these 10, 6 of them were something like 4th generation legacies and 2 were recruited athletes. That leaves 2 spots for 50 or so really qualified kids. This literally works its way down like a supply chain. We had 8 kids go to Dartmouth, but 4 of them were committed athletes their junior year. Another 2 were super legacies. In all, only about 16 kids or so really get in through their own personal skills and connections, really not that high of a number.

Also, elite boarding schools don't really inflate GPA. What you get is really just what you get. There are schools like Stanford who really put a focus on GPA, regardless of where you went to high school. Hence, Deerfield kids don't do so great with Stanford admissions. I think we had like 20 apply and only 2 got in.

So everywhere else absolutely, ivy league not so much.

 
therock555:
I went to Deerfield and can clarify this. Deerfield and other elite boarding schools help you get into great schools that are just below the Ivy League (Northwestern, UChicago, Duke--I know people say it's ivy caliber, but everyone at Deerfield chooses ivy over Duke, even Cornell--Georgetown, etc.) If you have the same stats at Deerfield vs a random public school, you have a much better shot at these schools.

Ivy League not so much. The numbers are very misleading. Yes a 1/4 of the kids go to Ivy League schools but you have to keep in mind how ridiculous connected these kids are. For instance, in my graduating year, we had about 10 kids go to Harvard. Out of these 10, 6 of them were something like 4th generation legacies and 2 were recruited athletes. That leaves 2 spots for 50 or so really qualified kids. This literally works its way down like a supply chain. We had 8 kids go to Dartmouth, but 4 of them were committed athletes their junior year. Another 2 were super legacies. In all, only about 16 kids or so really get in through their own personal skills and connections, really not that high of a number.

Also, elite boarding schools don't really inflate GPA. What you get is really just what you get. There are schools like Stanford who really put a focus on GPA, regardless of where you went to high school. Hence, Deerfield kids don't do so great with Stanford admissions. I think we had like 20 apply and only 2 got in.

So everywhere else absolutely, ivy league not so much.

Wait, what are you saying in the first paragraph? Are you saying people at Deerfield choose Cornell over Duke?! And what about Georgetown? BTW I noticed a LOT of boarding school kids ends up at Gtown, why is that?

When you say it doesn't help you with ivy league that sounds very broad to me. There is a gigantic difference between HYP and some of the rest like cornell or brown. Can't imagine how it can't help you at cornell/brown but can help you at NU, Uchicago, or Duke.

 
ltohang:
Wait, what are you saying in the first paragraph? Are you saying people at Deerfield choose Cornell over Duke?! And what about Georgetown? BTW I noticed a LOT of boarding school kids ends up at Gtown, why is that?

When you say it doesn't help you with ivy league that sounds very broad to me. There is a gigantic difference between HYP and some of the rest like cornell or brown. Can't imagine how it can't help you at cornell/brown but can help you at NU, Uchicago, or Duke.

I went to a very comparable school as Deerfield and I disagree with some of his points. Yes there are students who pick Cornell over Duke, but there are also people who do the opposite and people from public schools who may do it as well. That is a useless point. There is more to a decision than just a name.

Georgetown is definitely a hot spot for boarding schools, and from my school George Washington Univ and Colgate were as well. We also have more people get admitted to Cornell and UPenn than other ivy league school each year. No reason for it other than the college counseling offices push students toward the particular schools because the prep schools have a strong background with that school so it gives the students with lower stats a chance to get into better schools they typically would not be able to do.

In addition, schools you are applying to definitely weigh a prep students gpa differently than a public school student. The prep school does not inflate, the universities do. That is why his point holds true about having the same stats but from Deerfield gives you an edge. Those stats are much harder to achieve attending Deerfield than some random high school. Like I said my gpa was weighed 16% higher than my actual GPA from my prep school.

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 

1) Its about the label. People at Deerfield tend to choose Cornell over Duke probably 70-80% of the time and over Georgetown 100% of the time. Georgetown seems to love prep school kids. Some of the stupidest kids at Deerfield got into Georgetown; I have no idea how. 2) Like I said it's about the label. And the difference between HYP and Brown isn't "gigantic". It's very, very minimal. Stat-wise, there is almost no difference between a kid that gets into HYP and a kid that gets into Brown. A Brown grad can also get any job that an HYP grad can get.

 

WHAT'S THE COLOR OF SHIT? BROWN! BROWN! BROWN!

"Some things are believed because they are demonstrably true. But many other things are believed simply because they have been asserted repeatedly—and repetition has been accepted as a substitute for evidence." - Thomas Sowell
 

It's definitely helpful. A lot of even the brightest kids at my school were demoralized by how much of a joke the public hs we attended was, no discipline, no control, fights, and no real learning. This was supposed to be a top public as well, and I know that other high schools are even worse. Scoring a 2300+ on the SAT and getting a 3.7+ GPA is a much easier feat when attending a good school that gives you the freedom to succeed vs a public that demoralizes you.

 

At my Ivy, I knew many kids from boarding schools. many kids from Exeter, Phillips, Choate, etc.

My impression was that those kids from boarding school were very intelligent and definitely got into the school by their merit.

 

I went to prep school for athletics after spending a few years at a top public school, and I can tell you kids at my prep school were much more prepared for the college application process which I'm sure helped them. Another thing - they seemed to be more engaged in their studies and worked harder than at my public high school. And the interesting part is the public school I went to was in a VERY affluent area, these kids were from very successful families too. It convinced me to send my kids to an elite prep simply because they'll learn more and be more motivated to succeed.

 

It is definitely helpful if you are at a top, well-known boarding school like Andover or St. Pauls,but from my experience (at a mid sized boarding school) I actually ran into some problems getting into some of the larger schools. We had fairly significant grade deflation, so the large schools that didn't want to take considerable time assessing each applicant often dinged quality candidates, but we didn't have any problems getting into comparable LACs (i.e. the NESCAC schools).

 
ltohang:
How any of you guys end up at schools like Vanderbilt?

Vandy practically begged me to come even though I had terrible grades in high school; they just wanted more people from my school to go there and I was a legacy. Honestly, admissions for poor students (as in bad grades, not lack of wealth) is all about finding a connection on the board of regents or equivalent body, assuming you go to a respectable high school and your parents have good pedigrees.

All I care about in life is accumulating bananas
 
notamonkey:
ltohang:
How any of you guys end up at schools like Vanderbilt?

Vandy practically begged me to come even though I had terrible grades in high school; they just wanted more people from my school to go there and I was a legacy. Honestly, admissions for poor students (as in bad grades, not lack of wealth) is all about finding a connection on the board of regents or equivalent body, assuming you go to a respectable high school and your parents have good pedigrees.

Damn, college admissions is corrupt as fuck.

 

I think people are downplaying public schools here. I went to a small public school in the northeast and ended up having no real problems with college admissions (got into three ivies). I'm positive that thousands of kids that paid tons and tons of money to go to the most elite prep schools did not have as good results. What a joke! Then again I had to figure out everything on my own which was a little painful.

I think the benefit of a private school is to avoid some of the "riff raff" and get better teachers and counselors, not necessarily make it much easier to get into top colleges. In some ways it's even harder because your school is comprised of much relatively much smarter kids that you have to compete against. And you pay a shit ton of money which is a little ridiculous for high school, unless you are just that loaded.

 

I went to Avon Old Farms and agree with what seabird said. The guidance counselors play a big part in helping you get into the school you want to go to. They have connections and will bust your ass because in the end, that's why you paid the $50k per year to go there. In addition, if you are particularly good at a sport, recruiters from college will look at you much closer. My buddy just matriculated to an Ivy after doing a year in Juniors for hockey and only needed a 1700 on his SAT so it helps. Finally, we don't have a class rank and the kids that come here want to do well too. Chances are, there father or grandfather went to one of the top colleges but that doesn't stop them from working hard. The structure of the schedule (Wednesday's are half days and we go to school on Saturdays for a half day) definitely helps prepare you for college later down the line.

You're obviously there to get good grades, but being in a small school with less than 400 kids means you're part of a community and a brotherhood. I know it sounds cheesy, but there's just something about rolling up to a hockey game with 6 busses of students ready to support their team which adds that extra factor that you don't get from a public school. Those were the best 4 years of my life and I will absolutely send my kid there.

 

I went to Choate so maybe I can shed some light on this. Yes, there were a ton of athletes that got into top schools but they were insanely good at what they did. Some examples: drafted to the Brewins (Dartmouth) , scouted by the yankees (Harvard) etc. However, I'm convinced that the single easiest way to get into an ivy is to go to prep school and get involved with the crew team. Ivies absolutely love people who do crew and there isn't nearly as much competition in the sport as most schools don't have a program. If you're good at crew, youre in. Those who made it who weren't athletes had very special profiles. They had pretty much straight A's, competed in varsity sports, and got involved on campus. One kid went so far as to learn how to play the organ in order to stand out (he is now at Princeton). In other words, you still really have to work your ass off.

 

While I'm sure there is a great deal of corruption when it comes to college admissions, you can't deny the fact that not all high schools are created equal. Somebody with a 4.0 at a top boarding school is probably a safer bet from an academic point of view than someone from Tumbleweed High. Elite private schools aren't the only ones which rock Ivy admissions, top public schools in the Northeast do so as well. Just look at Boston Latin, the place is a funnel to Harvard. Evidently there's a selection process to get into BLS but there's some of that at most prep schools as well.

Looking at foreign examples can be instructive. In the UK, Westminster and Eton place more people into Oxbridge than any other high school (or whatever they're called). While a lot of that is tradition and nepotism, you can't deny that those schools are probably some of the best in the country from an academic point of view.

Even more telling is the case of high school systems with a nation-wide final exam. In France, you actually get to see the top 3 grades in each subject of the final high school test each year. Invariably, a least half those kids will come from one of the top public schools in Paris. There are a couple public high schools in Paris (Louis-le-Grand and Henri IV) which have a competitive entrance. The exam at the end of senior year is the same for every student in France and yet kids from these two schools will be in the top 3 of each subject every single year. They're clearly working harder and have better teachers than other high schools.

Italy probably makes this case the most obvious. It has been shown with statistical significance that kids from the South of the country do worse on average than kids from the North on their final exam. Are they dumber? Maybe but it probably has to do with the quality of the schools and culture. And prep schools in the US are the closest thing you have culturally speaking to the Ivy League. So maybe there's something there.

 
GoodBread:
While I'm sure there is a great deal of corruption when it comes to college admissions, you can't deny the fact that not all high schools are created equal. Somebody with a 4.0 at a top boarding school is probably a safer bet from an academic point of view than someone from Tumbleweed High. Elite private schools aren't the only ones which rock Ivy admissions, top public schools in the Northeast do so as well. Just look at Boston Latin, the place is a funnel to Harvard. Evidently there's a selection process to get into BLS but there's some of that at most prep schools as well.

Looking at foreign examples can be instructive. In the UK, Westminster and Eton place more people into Oxbridge than any other high school (or whatever they're called). While a lot of that is tradition and nepotism, you can't deny that those schools are probably some of the best in the country from an academic point of view.

Even more telling is the case of high school systems with a nation-wide final exam. In France, you actually get to see the top 3 grades in each subject of the final high school test each year. Invariably, a least half those kids will come from one of the top public schools in Paris. There are a couple public high schools in Paris (Louis-le-Grand and Henri IV) which have a competitive entrance. The exam at the end of senior year is the same for every student in France and yet kids from these two schools will be in the top 3 of each subject every single year. They're clearly working harder and have better teachers than other high schools.

Italy probably makes this case the most obvious. It has been shown with statistical significance that kids from the South of the country do worse on average than kids from the North on their final exam. Are they dumber? Maybe but it probably has to do with the quality of the schools and culture. And prep schools in the US are the closest thing you have culturally speaking to the Ivy League. So maybe there's something there.

I have no problem with a lot of kids from the same high school going to a top college. It makes sense if it was a competitive school to get into in the first place. We're not dealing with random samples here.

What I do have a problem is a marginal student taking the spot of a highly qualified student because the former had connections and the latter did not. I find that pretty obnoxious. Even more obnoxious is the comment someone here made about deserving to go to an Ivy because they endured boarding school.

 
SirTradesaLot:
What I do have a problem is a marginal student taking the spot of a highly qualified student because the former had connections and the latter did not. I find that pretty obnoxious. Even more obnoxious is the comment someone here made about deserving to go to an Ivy because they endured boarding school.
I'm with you 100%, lol @ prep school being compared to a prison.
 

In case anyone wondered 'how could affirmative action come to be?'. Part of the reason it was implemented was to counteract the effects of the good ol' boy network that many people have spoken about here. I don't think it has been particularly fair or effective, but I think it's pretty easy to understand why people sought to implement it. The problem is that there are many white people that don't have access to this club either. I find it pretty disturbing that spots are getting taken away from more highly qualified candidates because of parent or school counselor connections.

 

First, I love this website and after only discovering it a few months ago, I must say I have learned a lot of valuable things from the posts.

I wen't to top prep school in CT in the Founder's League. While it isn't as prestigious as Exeter, Deerfield or Philips (Andover), it is a very good school. I can only speak to my experience, but my school never inflated our GPA's. It didn't matter whether you were taking AP Calc 2 or in some easy earth science class. Because of this, most of my friends had around 3.3 - 3.7. However, all my friends had over a 2050 on the SATs and over a 30 on the ACTs. So, while we weren't the top of applicants in terms of GPA, we did get a lot of looks due to our test scores. In addition, prep schools have the reputation of having hard academics and based on how alumni from my school performed, college admissions would use them as a guide. So if someone from my school had a 3.7 and did really well at MIT, they might judge any applicant off those standards. With regards to Ivy's, most of the people there were legacies or athletes. I think my year we sent 4 kids to Yale for football. You still have to work really hard though. We also had a college counselor assigned to us starting Junior year, with each having under 50 kids from my class. When you have that much help from a counselor it will be an advantage. Also, we have school sponsored test prep starting at the same time.

Given the schools reputation, our alumni, counselors that know our names and work for "us", and test prep for free, we have an advantage due to that. But, I think most kids end up in NESCAC schools who go to prep school, just because of how similar they are to prep schools. Those are the ones that we have the biggest advantage at.

I will say that I know quite a few NE public school kids at a lot of really good schools and had they wen't to my prep school they would have had the same life results (e.g. end up at yale, or harvard, or MIT etc.), they just saved their parents around 200,000 lol. So, maybe it does help maybe it doesn't, I think it just depends how hard you work in high school regardless.

 

I went to a public high school known nationally for its arts programs with general recognition for its academics. I'd definitely say that we're more of a Juilliard feeder than an Ivy feeder. Regardless, a couple of us manage to make it every year, myself included.

I had no idea that such a rampant prep school culture existed at Ivies until I actually went and saw how many of my peers were from top boarding schools or top private schools. I have no doubt that going to one of those high schools will help you get into an Ivy. It's the same reason why students from Ivies have an easier time picking up job interviews — you've got the brand name.

For what it's worth, I've been unimpressed with the level of intelligence of boarding school students at Wharton. I'm not saying that they haven't had great accomplishments, but it's just important to recognize that boarding school != intelligence.

 

For what it's worth, some of the smartest kids I met at my school were prep school grads. There was one guy who graduated with a 4.0 GPA in physics/ math from my college, who happens to be an alumnus of a top boarding school. I took stats class with him once which was the hardest course I took at my school being an Econ major, and he would end up getting near perfect scores on all exams all the time that our professor made him TA the course next semester. The guy is working at a top hedge fund now, as a trader, making over 300k a year at 25 years old.

Facebook founder Zuckerburg was an Exeter grad, then went to Harvard, where he dropped out. I think that due to these prep schools having strict admissions criteria, their student body is much more qualified and talented overall compared to regular public schools. I would not see a problem with the system where Ivies give admissions preference to those coming from these schools.

 
IvyGrad:
For what it's worth, some of the smartest kids I met at my school were prep school grads. There was one guy who graduated with a 4.0 GPA in physics/ math from my college, who happens to be an alumnus of a top boarding school. I took stats class with him once which was the hardest course I took at my school being an Econ major, and he would end up getting near perfect scores on all exams all the time that our professor made him TA the course next semester. The guy is working at a top hedge fund now, as a trader, making over 300k a year at 25 years old.

Facebook founder Zuckerburg was an Exeter grad, then went to Harvard, where he dropped out. I think that due to these prep schools having strict admissions criteria, their student body is much more qualified and talented overall compared to regular public schools. I would not see a problem with the system where Ivies give admissions preference to those coming from these schools.

I must not be making my point clear. On average a high school that has competitive admissions will have higher quality students than a public school that has to take everyone. One should expect more of the kids from the competitive school to get in to better colleges. Everyone agrees on that.

The problem is when you have counsellors who are able to push the less than ideal candidate from their school over another candidate from another school who is ideal. That's what some of the posters here are claiming.

 
SirTradesaLot:
IvyGrad:
For what it's worth, some of the smartest kids I met at my school were prep school grads. There was one guy who graduated with a 4.0 GPA in physics/ math from my college, who happens to be an alumnus of a top boarding school. I took stats class with him once which was the hardest course I took at my school being an Econ major, and he would end up getting near perfect scores on all exams all the time that our professor made him TA the course next semester. The guy is working at a top hedge fund now, as a trader, making over 300k a year at 25 years old.

Facebook founder Zuckerburg was an Exeter grad, then went to Harvard, where he dropped out. I think that due to these prep schools having strict admissions criteria, their student body is much more qualified and talented overall compared to regular public schools. I would not see a problem with the system where Ivies give admissions preference to those coming from these schools.

I must not be making my point clear. On average a high school that has competitive admissions will have higher quality students than a public school that has to take everyone. One should expect more of the kids from the competitive school to get in to better colleges. Everyone agrees on that.

The problem is when you have counsellors who are able to push the less than ideal candidate from their school over another candidate from another school who is ideal. That's what some of the posters here are claiming.

Trust me, nobody nowadays gets into HYP-level undergrad because of some counselor's backing or favor. Also, unless you are a Kennedy, Clinton, or Bush, your "family connections" won't get you into HYP. The admit rate at Harvard or Yale are close to 5% now. However, that figure is inflated, since it includes admit rate with URM and recruited athletes. In other words, if you are a regular suburban non-athlete white male with no hooks, it is just incredibly competitive to get in and your admissions chances would hover around 3-4%.

Top Ivies receive thousands of more applications with near perfect stats than they are able to accomodate. At my alma mater (Yale) the admissions rep claimed that only 13-15% of those who scored above 2300 on SAT were given admission each year.

Under these circumstances, you either have to be either 1) absolute academic all star, 2) recruited athlete, 3) URM with strong, but not tremendous, stats, or 4) have your daddy donate millions, to get in. As some pointed out already, even if you attend top boarding school, you will have to get other pieces of application all done at the most competitive level: near perfect SAT, strong ec's, and impeccable academic records/ grades, to get into top Ivies. After all, the majority of kids from top boarding schools don't end up at HYP-level colleges.

If anything, I found that the prep-school alums at my college were more qualified and had more raw intellectual horsepower compared to many alums of large public high schools. I say this as an alum of a public high school system.

 

Brady, if that's you, just send your kids to a decent suburban public school.

I do think the Ivies are going to do some reverse discrimination on this. If you have straight 5s on eight APs coming out of Council Bluffs, IA, and you've grown six of the largest watermelons at the Iowa State Fair through your 4H club, you have a background that is likely preferable to a kid from the Hun School or Exeter.

The key here though is that the Ivies are looking for something on the tails. They want to see very good academics. And then they want to see one or two extraordinary things that they don't already have.

"Football captains and valedictorians are a dime a dozen. This more typical/common applicant is a better fit for UIUC."

"Someone ranked fifteenth in a class of 190 at Council Bluffs High School who can grow the largest watermelons in the state of Iowa and still get six 5s on the APs? Hey we don't have that! Better snap him up before Yale does!"

If you REALLY REALLY want your kids into a private school, move somewhere rural and get them into 4H club. And then just make sure they become expert gardeners who can grow 1200 lb pumpkins and 150 lb zucchini that can win state fairs.

Of course, nobody wants to do that.

 
Going Concern:
IlliniProgrammer:
I do think the Ivies are going to do some reverse discrimination on this.

Your ivy bashing is always amusing and entertaining. Iowa and watermelons? Classic. Of course if those watermelons don't grow then you're shortchanged on all accounts. Seems like you're gambling a lot on your soil quality and farming prowess.

In this case, it's simply private school bashing.

Look, the easiest way to get somewhere in life is often finding the place where the competition is a bit easier. 100 people are gunning for the ivies by becoming valedictorian at Exeter or Andover. Exactly one person in the country is gunning for it by winning the South Dakota State Fair, and his IQ is 120.

The first secret is that the ivies- as well as the banks- are always looking for a diverse set of backgrounds.

The second secret is that- saying nothing about the AVERAGE student- there are as many brilliant and successful students at the public ivies- possibly more- as there are at the private ivies just by virtue of the sample sizes.

Contrarian investment strategies tend to do extremely well. Crowded trades suck. Contrarian admission strategies offer a better shot than the traditional route of Exeter-> Harvard-> Goldman-> Blackstone-> HBS-> Blackstone-> Greatness.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
If you REALLY REALLY want your kids into a private school, move somewhere rural and get them into 4H club. And then just make sure they become expert gardeners who can grow 1200 lb pumpkins and 150 lb zucchini that can win state fairs.

Of course, nobody wants to do that.

IP,

Are you actually trying to sabotage "Brady's" chances? You're usually a pretty clever guy, so I'll assume yes. You should swing by Wallace Hall and talk to Tom Espenshade.

From a 2010 Ross Douthat article in the Times:

"Last year, two Princeton sociologists, Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Walton Radford, published a book-length study of admissions and affirmative action at eight highly selective colleges and universities. Unsurprisingly, they found that the admissions process seemed to favor black and Hispanic applicants, while whites and Asians needed higher grades and SAT scores to get in. But what was striking, as Russell K. Nieli pointed out last week on the conservative Web site Minding the Campus, was which whites were most disadvantaged by the process: the downscale, the rural and the working-class."

...

"But cultural biases seem to be at work as well. Nieli highlights one of the study’s more remarkable findings: while most extracurricular activities increase your odds of admission to an elite school, holding a leadership role or winning awards in organizations like high school R.O.T.C., 4-H clubs and Future Farmers of America actually works against your chances. Consciously or unconsciously, the gatekeepers of elite education seem to incline against candidates who seem too stereotypically rural or right-wing or 'Red America.'"

The study he's referring to is one of Espenshade's: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9072.html

 
holla_back][quote=IlliniProgrammer:
If you REALLY REALLY want your kids into a private school, move somewhere rural and get them into 4H club. And then just make sure they become expert gardeners who can grow 1200 lb pumpkins and 150 lb zucchini that can win state fairs.

Of course, nobody wants to do that.

IP,

Are you actually trying to sabotage "Brady's" chances? You're usually a pretty clever guy, so I'll assume yes. You should swing by Wallace Hall and talk to Tom Espenshade.

From a 2010 Ross Douthat article in the Times:

"Last year, two Princeton sociologists, Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Walton Radford, published a book-length study of admissions and affirmative action at eight highly selective colleges and universities. Unsurprisingly, they found that the admissions process seemed to favor black and Hispanic applicants, while whites and Asians needed higher grades and SAT scores to get in. But what was striking, as Russell K. Nieli pointed out last week on the conservative Web site Minding the Campus, was which whites were most disadvantaged by the process: the downscale, the rural and the working-class."

...

"But cultural biases seem to be at work as well. Nieli highlights one of the study’s more remarkable findings: while most extracurricular activities increase your odds of admission to an elite school, holding a leadership role or winning awards in organizations like high school R.O.T.C., 4-H clubs and Future Farmers of America actually works against your chances. Consciously or unconsciously, the gatekeepers of elite education seem to incline against candidates who seem too stereotypically rural or right-wing or 'Red America.'"

The study he's referring to is one of Espenshade's: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9072.html[/quote]

The only groups that the affirmative action system helps are upper class (mostly white) and middle-middle upper class blacks and hispanics. Everyone else gets fucked.

 
That's true, but you always want to have fallbacks in whatever you're doing. If you go all in on watermelons in Iowa and don't come out with huge juicy ones, you're SOL and pretty much out of options. It also doesn't hurt to actually like what you're doing...
No, then you just go to the University of Iowa, study agricultural science, and arb Jim Rogers' farmland investments on soil quality. Do that for a while until the state of Iowa decides to engage in some populist mercantilism, run the state's treasury for a few years, and arb guys like Jim Rogers some more for the state's taxpayers and pensions. Run for governor and send the kids to the University of Wisconsin, which I predict could supplant Harvard in the rankings in 40 years if the midwestern states manage tax and agricultural policy correctly.
 
For the people that went to these top boarding school especially in New England, is it incredibly easy(ier) to get into an elite university/ivy compared to a public school?

You know, I think it depends on the prep school. Deerfield and Andover, definitely. For example, a really smart friend of mine went to the former, had his pick of top liberal art schools, and eventually went to study architecture at a top 20 school. Based on him and his Deerfield friends, I'd say Deerfield is pretty solid.

Choate, from the kids I know, seems like the public school you pay for. Those kids end up going to places like BU/GWU (and some of them couldn't even get into UMiami) and were some of the most vile people I've ever met. They were the kids who could read a book and understand the words in it, but would have had a difficult time piecing together the summary and deeper meaning.

 
SirTradesaLot:
Ivy -- So, your view is that going to a prep school makes it more difficult to get into an Ivy (all else equal)?

Depends. The way I look at this issue:

Scenario 1:

Candidate X comes from Exeter or Andover (top prep school). SAT = 2300. Top 5% of class.

Candidate Y comes from a large public high school. SAT = 2300. Top 5% of class.

*Assume all else equal, including essays, extra-curriculars, etc

Under this scenario, I would say candidate X stands a better chance of admission into HYP. After all, top 5% of class at Andover, which has long been known for academic excellence, would give admissions reps more benefit of doubt. However, there is little dispute that it is more difficult to achieve top 5% class rank at Andover compared to a regular public high school. So, the fact that candidate X stands a better chance of admission at Ivies, I would say, isn't much of "privilege" anyway.

Scenario 2:

Candidate X comes from Andover. SAT = 2300. Top 20% of class.

Candidate Y comes from a large public high school. SAT = 2300. top 1% of class.

*Assume all else equal.

Under this scenario, candidate Y stands a far better chance at admission into top Ivies. No question. Again, getting into HYP nowadays is so competitive that just because you attend a reputable prep high school, having a non-stellar SAT or class rank can't be an excuse.

Starting this year, I began to volunteer as an alumni interviewer for Yale in NYC metro area. I already interviewed several kids, and will interview more. It will be interesting to see which of those kids end up getting in. For the record, every kid I've interviewed so far had at least 2200 on SAT and had top 5% class rank at their high school, regardless of which high school they were coming from.

 

$45,000 a year on boarding school and another $50,000 a year on a top notch college sounds insane to me, even if I had more money than I knew what to do with.

When it's all said and done we're talking about spending almost a half a million on education per child between 9th grade and college graduation.

I guess if you're filthy rich, return on investment

Competition is a sin. -John D. Rockefeller
 

I don't think it matters unless it's a top ivy. I went to a good suburban public school which isn't exactly ranked or anything yet plenty of kids went to great LACs and ivies. It doesn't matter where you go to school to be competitive for the top schools outside the ivy, test scores and grades are enough. 2150+ and a 3.7+ gpa in HS will get you into NW, Gtown, Vandy, Emory, etc. regardless of pedigree, or at least be very competitive.

When it comes down to it, I think AP scores matter quite a bit to even the playing field. Plenty of A's are given out in AP classes, but if you don't get a 4 or 5 you have pretty much failed and your grade for that class is very misleading.

Spending 50k for prep school to go to Gtown or that type of school???? Not worth it.

 

Personally I've found that kids from vanderbilt or duke have much higher quality student bodies than kids from prep school ivy reject schools like Georgetown. Seems like all the prep school kids that couldn't make the ivies ended up at Georgetown, but since those two former schools are in the south a lot of northern preppies don't choose it as much as northern colleges so alot of outstanding kids end up there by choice.

 
ltohang:
Personally I've found that kids from vanderbilt or duke have much higher quality student bodies than kids from prep school ivy reject schools like Georgetown. Seems like all the prep school kids that couldn't make the ivies ended up at Georgetown, but since those two former schools are in the south a lot of northern preppies don't choose it as much as northern colleges so alot of outstanding kids end up there by choice.
i can attest to this. many georgetown cas kids are idiots.

by the way, ivy league is a pretty broad term. i seriously doubt it's easier for boarding school kids to get into duke than cornell.

 

Another thing, I heard the financial aid is really good at a lot if these prep schools. What if you come from a family that's very middle class, do you get the benefits you'd receive from elite units such as need blind admissions and meeting full need.

 
ltohang:
Another thing, I heard the financial aid is really good at a lot if these prep schools. What if you come from a family that's very middle class, do you get the benefits you'd receive from elite units such as need blind admissions and meeting full need.
Yeah, but you also have to move away from your family at 14, which your parents may not think is such a good idea.

My parents were pretty lenient growing up. I was crossing four lane highways on a bicycle on my way to second grade; I was mowing lawns and had a go-kart at 9. I could even watch Jerry Springer growing up, although they'd shut off the TV when it got to "Angry Trannies who Tricked Each Other"

They didn't think sending kids to boarding school was a very wise move. Part of parenting is teaching your kids values, and probably >50% of that happens in high school.

 
ltohang:
Another thing, I heard the financial aid is really good at a lot if these prep schools. What if you come from a family that's very middle class, do you get the benefits you'd receive from elite units such as need blind admissions and meeting full need.
Most of the top prep schools aren't needblind. I had 99% SSAT's/great grades and recommendations, but I got waitlisted at numerous prep schools. I'm not going to blame it entirely on financial issues, but I'm sure the fact that I would have needed a full-ride played a role.
 
Best Response

The smartest person I've ever met came to my college from Exeter. Don't want to get into specifics but let's just say he had nearly perfect grades in a combination of some of the hardest majors out there and is working in one of WSO's dream jobs. That kid absolutely earned it.

At the same time, there are plenty of kids at my college that went to prep schools who are just rich and aren't necessarily especially smart.

A few of my friends from pretty big name prep schools have told me they cheated a good amount in high school and their friends did as well, and now they're at top colleges. Not sure how widespread this is though.

Others have told me that they worked harder at their prep schools than they did in college.

From what I can tell, prep school kids go to top colleges because: 1) They're more likely to come from parents that went to top colleges which means: 1a) They might have legacy status 1b) Their parents know how to navigate the process. The parents push them into certain activities and push them to get certain grades to get into a top college, whereas the son of a farmer doesn't necessarily have someone telling them about the boxes their supposed to be checking off. There are tons of cases of helicopter parents that make sure their kids are checking those boxes. Example: I kid you not, a friend at my college gets his emails from professors filtered into folders in his inbox by his mom so that he'll keep track of his assignments. Helicopter parents are rampant at prep schools.

2) Their parents are more likely to be rich which means: 2a) They are more likely to be contributing to the school, which can lead to "development" admits 2b) They have resources to get their kids into certain sports like rowing/sailing that are typically absent from public schools 2c) Kids are more able to do interesting activities like starting businesses, starting NGOs, starting charities, doing some sort of humanitarian work in a third world country, etc

3) Social pressure. If you go to a random public school (like I did), often nobody is even thinking about college until the last minute. They haven't been brought up in an environment where everyone is obsessed with HYP and everyone is high achieving. Half my high school class didn't even go to college and only 2 (including me) ended up at target colleges. The culture is so different. My friends that went to prep school were obsessing over this stuff since freshman year and it's considered cool to do well in school in achieve there, whereas you would get made fun of if you raised your hand in class at my public school. When you're competing with a bunch of over-achievers, you're likely to perform better than when you're competing with people that get in daily fights, are perpetually stoned, and have no direction in life.

4) Guidance counselors form relationships with the admissions office at top schools and work to get kids in

5) There is a ton more handholding in the college admissions process at prep schools. They help you through every step and tell you about deadlines, strategies, etc. They give you SAT prep. Most public schools do very little to inform students about how to navigate the process, meaning you have to figure it out on your own.

6) The curriculum is harder so top students have a chance to shine. If you're a really smart kid at a random public high school, you might be able to take certain AP classes, but even if you get perfect grades, you might not have access to the harder classes that might challenge you and allow you to prove yourself to admissions committees. There are kids at my college that took linear algebra, real analysis, and/or organic chemistry in high school. That obviously proves that they are really smart kids and can handle a top school. But kids at public high schools that could have also done well in those classes don't have the ability to even enroll in the classes to prove themselves.

 
<span itemprop=name>Newspeak</span>:

The smartest person I've ever met came to my college from Exeter. Don't want to get into specifics but let's just say he had nearly perfect grades in a combination of some of the hardest majors out there and is working in one of WSO's dream jobs. That kid absolutely earned it.

At the same time, there are plenty of kids at my college that went to prep schools who are just rich and aren't necessarily especially smart.

A few of my friends from pretty big name prep schools have told me they cheated a good amount in high school and their friends did as well, and now they're at top colleges. Not sure how widespread this is though.

Others have told me that they worked harder at their prep schools than they did in college.

From what I can tell, prep school kids go to top colleges because:
1) They're more likely to come from parents that went to top colleges which means:
1a) They might have legacy status
1b) Their parents know how to navigate the process. The parents push them into certain activities and push them to get certain grades to get into a top college, whereas the son of a farmer doesn't necessarily have someone telling them about the boxes their supposed to be checking off. There are tons of cases of helicopter parents that make sure their kids are checking those boxes. Example: I kid you not, a friend at my college gets his emails from professors filtered into folders in his inbox by his mom so that he'll keep track of his assignments. Helicopter parents are rampant at prep schools.

2) Their parents are more likely to be rich which means:
2a) They are more likely to be contributing to the school, which can lead to "development" admits
2b) They have resources to get their kids into certain sports like rowing/sailing that are typically absent from public schools
2c) Kids are more able to do interesting activities like starting businesses, starting NGOs, starting charities, doing some sort of humanitarian work in a third world country, etc

3) Social pressure. If you go to a random public school (like I did), often nobody is even thinking about college until the last minute. They haven't been brought up in an environment where everyone is obsessed with HYP and everyone is high achieving. Half my high school class didn't even go to college and only 2 (including me) ended up at target colleges. The culture is so different. My friends that went to prep school were obsessing over this stuff since freshman year and it's considered cool to do well in school in achieve there, whereas you would get made fun of if you raised your hand in class at my public school. When you're competing with a bunch of over-achievers, you're likely to perform better than when you're competing with people that get in daily fights, are perpetually stoned, and have no direction in life.

4) Guidance counselors form relationships with the admissions office at top schools and work to get kids in

5) There is a ton more handholding in the college admissions process at prep schools. They help you through every step and tell you about deadlines, strategies, etc. They give you SAT prep. Most public schools do very little to inform students about how to navigate the process, meaning you have to figure it out on your own.

6) The curriculum is harder so top students have a chance to shine. If you're a really smart kid at a random public high school, you might be able to take certain AP classes, but even if you get perfect grades, you might not have access to the harder classes that might challenge you and allow you to prove yourself to admissions committees. There are kids at my college that took linear algebra, real analysis, and/or organic chemistry in high school. That obviously proves that they are really smart kids and can handle a top school. But kids at public high schools that could have also done well in those classes don't have the ability to even enroll in the classes to prove themselves.

Great post. #3 is key. Also don't forget prep school kids are basically in school 24/7, public kids are in school 30 hours a week? It's night and day. It's hilarious when public grads that have zero exposure to prep school think it's a waste of money. Some of the smartest most successful people in the world send their kids to prep schools ... it's not because they hate their kids.

 

Qui odit inventore inventore qui. Nam placeat culpa distinctio amet voluptatem provident sed. Iusto sed in vel nulla optio eos. Quaerat nesciunt nam aliquid neque id autem. Similique et recusandae rerum placeat in error. Voluptatum dolorem non voluptas animi corporis odit.

 

Laborum quam et accusamus veritatis minima architecto recusandae. Cumque a voluptas laboriosam non labore. Omnis ad aut impedit pariatur quo repudiandae dolorum.

Ad dolores illo ducimus dolore aut. Quis magnam recusandae molestiae ab rerum et. Aut vitae voluptatum sed accusantium molestiae quidem dolorem. Ad placeat nemo autem. Cum expedita consectetur exercitationem magni ut. Quia labore dolor occaecati earum et necessitatibus nihil. Nostrum beatae autem beatae aspernatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”