Is Equity Research a dying career?
(Senior Monkey, 77
Points)
on 6/5/12 at 3:00am
This could be a completely stupid question, so don't hound me to hard, BUT I have read two different forums (threads 1-2 years old) that have stated that Equity Research is on the decline and could be potentially dead in the next 5 years or so? Is there any validity to this?
Cheers






Curious as well
Curious as well
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
I don't work in ER (still in
I don't work in ER (still in college), but I think big banks may "outsource" their research in the future. I think there's going to be a lot of new financial services firms that's going to focus solely on ER.
It's sort of like how many companies today outsource their behind-the-scenes operations (e.g. HR, audit) to other specialized firms (e.g. Kelly Services). It cuts down costs and increases efficiency. Not saying ER is back office, but it's certainly not as front office as IBD or S&T.
Rambo what r u talking about
Rambo what r u talking about ER not being front office? ER is definately front office. Sure ER isnt the correct pathway if you decide to go into PE, IB or corporate advisory because it is not deals focused but nontheless, focusing on and understanding economics, finance and markets you can make a hell of a load of good coin in the future, say in 15-20 years, when the next bullmarket returns. Sure there are not many openings in ER at the moment but if you build a career in 20 years time when the next bull market comes, you are set considering the amount of baby boomers that have retired. It depends what you love and are interested in. PE isnt the end all and be all and I think plenty of jobs remain in PE, all you have to look at is efinancialcareers to see this point is true.
ER is going to be the best
ER is going to be the best survivor in a terminally declining industry. Not unlike carriage interior manufacturers of the late 1800s. The actually carriagemakers went out of business, but the interior guys got contracts from the automakers and ultimately got bought out by them.
IBD makes the wooden carriage wheels and S&T makes the horses. But ER does something that creates value regardless of the market. It ultimately does the research that shows where the money should go. You could argue that it is back-officey, but it's a lot harder to make the argument that it doesn't create economic value than it is for S&T or IBD.
Work hard, play hard.
ER is close to being dead
ER is close to being dead bros.
spaceagecowboy: ER is close
ER is close to being dead bros.
Please distinguish fact from opinion
IlliniProgrammer: ER is going
ER is going to be the best survivor in a terminally declining industry. Not unlike carriage interior manufacturers of the late 1800s. The actually carriagemakers went out of business, but the interior guys got contracts from the automakers and ultimately got bought out by them.
This is an excellent observation. Any idea on what the shape of the role will be a few years down the line? I'm trying to get a feel for what the industry will look like to plan in that direction, so I figure why not spend a few minutes speculating...
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
It will still be there as
It will still be there as long as there are buyside firms around. That being said...how much is going to be in the US is debatable.
As long as the
As long as the companies/primary businesses are in the US, ER will be in the US.
With the discovery of shale gas and the US's control of the great lakes- the world's largest supply of fresh water- I suspect those businesses and thus ER will be in the US for the rest of our lifetimes.
Work hard, play hard.
1a. ER is front office. It is
1a. ER is front office. It is a client facing role. Any other suggestion is ludicrous. ER analysts don't simply sit behind a computer and type all day. They talk to C-level execs and portfolio managers for the largest asset managers (i.e. mutual funds, hedge funds) in the world. I'm not sure where the confusion comes from.
1b. ER is not dying but consolidating and rationalizing, yes. There are far too many analysts covering stocks and far too many boutiques. It's common to read something like "well-respected boutique" on this site but in reality, besides a handful of places like ISI Group, boutiques are homogeneous. With volumes down and commission growth minimal, the boutique S&T model will disappear and shops will close. BB's will still be able to stay afloat by capturing trading commissions and more soft dollars because of better corporate and analyst access. Note that I didn't say better analysts but BB's have bigger coffers and will always be able to support more analyst marketing, large conferences and non-deal roadshows which are the main sources of commissions. There's no reason that more than ~15 people should cover any one stock and sadly, a lot more firms and analysts will need to be thinned out before ER can be profitable again.
Dank Nugs: 1b. ER is not
1b. ER is not dying but consolidating and rationalizing, yes. There are far too many analysts covering stocks and far too many boutiques. It's common to read something like "well-respected boutique" on this site but in reality, besides a handful of places like ISI Group, boutiques are homogeneous. With volumes down and commission growth minimal, the boutique S&T model will disappear and shops will close. BB's will still be able to stay afloat by capturing trading commissions and more soft dollars because of better corporate and analyst access. Note that I didn't say better analysts but BB's have bigger coffers and will always be able to support more analyst marketing, large conferences and non-deal roadshows which are the main sources of commissions. There's no reason that more than ~15 people should cover any one stock and sadly, a lot more firms and analysts will need to be thinned out before ER can be profitable again.
This is the impression I've gotten lately as well. Where do you see the opportunity within ER? Where do you think the opportunity for people will be as the fat is trimmed in the industry?
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
The buyside will exist, so ER
The buyside will exist, so ER will exist. There are too many companies for funds to research every one in depth. Likewise, ER will be most in demand for unusual industries or industries undergoing considerable change.
Basic materials requires in depth knowledge of those markets, reserves (in the case of metals & mining), and established hedges.
Biotech, Pharma, and HC require a lot of industry expertise, to the extent that a science background is very useful. Is XYZ co's drug novel enough for a patent? What is the likelihood of FDA approval, given the results of past tests?
FIG is tough. Banks are rapidly changing, and all financial institutions are very complex. Due to often lackluster disclosure, you have to dig deeper than the 10k.
Real estate also operates according to its own set of valuation metrics. Same with O&G.
Unless you are a giant $20+ billion HF or massive mutual fund, you are unlikely to have sector specialists. And you do need specific knowledge here; I would not feel remotely confident valuing a startup biotech company, for instance.
Thanks for the excellent
Thanks for the excellent insight guys.
Would have given SB to you all if I had them.
I'll reply to a few posts separately.
However, the general consensus I have been getting from these comments is that ER is FO despite what some say. And that in a bad market it is the most important division because it reveals where money should/shouldn't be which can save millions if not billions. Yes?
Secondly, a few people stated that it will be going through a massive shuffle in the foreseeable future, is it possible for anyone to put a timeline on this? When it will return to the strength it once was or whether it will at all return to that?
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
Rambo: I don't work in ER
I don't work in ER (still in college), but I think big banks may "outsource" their research in the future. I think there's going to be a lot of new financial services firms that's going to focus solely on ER.
I get the impression that this could be a good thing? Correct me if im wrong, but it sounds like they will become more independent and maybe more relied upon?
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
spaceagecowboy: ER is close
ER is close to being dead bros.
Explain please :o
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
Dank Nugs: 1b. ER is not
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
Good luck convincing your
IamObama: Good luck
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
West Coast rainmaker: The
Research is where a lot of
Kudos to westcoast and nugs,
u always r gonna need ER
swagon: u always r gonna need
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
burnsy: swagon: u always r
HumPiranha88: burnsy: swa
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
I am currently doing trading
There will be always be room
burnsy: HumPiranha88: bur
I eat success for breakfast...with skim milk
Ben Shalom Bernanke: There
I don't think so. I think
mal228: But i still think
andyinsandiego: mal228: Bu
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
There are gonna be 50,000
It's a cost center. They
I dont think some sectors
Ben Shalom Bernanke: There
-Brasky Out
Bill Brasky77: Ben Shalom
The people who think that ER
Ben Shalom Bernanke: Bill
-Brasky Out
I think ER industry will be
Tommy Too-toned: There are
I recently read an article on
I am surprised that many of
Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
Also, like some have said, ER
Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
wallstreetballa: Tommy
Maybe this was already said
I also hear some finance old
Baby you're the perfect shape, baby you're the perfect weight. Treat me like my birthday, I want it this way and I want it that way. It makes a man feel good baby.
swagon: u always r gonna need
See my Monday Morning Brainteasers
Buddyfox: swagon: u always
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
burnsy: Buddyfox: swagon:
I eat success for breakfast...with skim milk