Algo trading's new Holy Grail?
Hmm, I wonder if this is what James Simons does?
Trading has a ton of indicators, Bollinger bands, Support, Resistance, MACD, and Fibonacci ratios just to name a few.
But two Professors from Indiana University, Johan Bollen and Huina Mao, along with the University of Manchester's Xiao-Jun Zeng, may have just found the ultimate indicator.
Twitter.
The Twitter calmness index to be exact, and according to this report it is accurate up to 87.6% in predicting the daily ups and downs of the Dow.
Using mood tracking tools such as the Google-Profile of Mood States (GPOMS) and OpinionFinder, and then taking 9.7 million tweets posted by 2.7 million tweeters globally between March and December 2008, then comparing their calmness levels to the DJIA of the same period, the trio has found surprising correlations.
Lagging by just 2 to 6 days, their time series graphs show that the two frequently overlap or at the very least, point in the same direction. "We find an accuracy of 87.6% in predicting the daily up and down changes in the closing values of the Dow Jones Industrial Average" Bollen and company said, totally repeating what I wrote earlier.
of course not.........................
Classic case of correlation vs. causation...
I"ll second DontMakeMeShortYou, though my first impression of reading this post was, "Can they do the same thing with fb, perhaps with more accuracy, than with twitter?"
What does James Simons have to do with this? He is the father of Algo trading.
I'm sorry...does this have some sort of predictive power of which I am not aware? It seems it retroactively looks at Twitter and then compares the number of tweets to the moves in the markets on that date. This isn't ground-breaking work. It is an effort to seek a cause for an already observed effect. Or am I reading this incorrectly? Are they saying that an increase in tweets indicates a move in the markets, and that the markets lag by a few days? Or are they saying that due to large market moves, there are many more tweets than normal?
If it's the latter, who gives a fuck?
Read the paper. It compares the mood of the general public expressed through tweets with the DJIA. It says nothing about "the number of tweets". The general public is much larger than the investing public. In fact, most of the people tweeting used in this study said things like "I feel" or "I am" and then some sort of emotion/mood related statement. The paper compares the collective mood by aggregating the data and comparing it with the DJIA. Your analysis that it is an effor to seek a cause for an already observed effect is off base: the two events are seemingly unrelated. Do you really think that me tweeting something like "I'm upset because I didn't get a hot dog at the baseball game" actually has an effect on the DJIA? It does not.
All it reveals is a strong correlation between the mood of the general public (based on the content of tweets, not the number; also, the only mood that showed any significant relationship was calmness) and the DJIA.
Next time read the paper before you make a comment on it.
Shouldn't professors at Indiana University know that correlation isn't causal? This seems like a completely useless study unless they can figure out some way to look at it other than retroactively. Definitely interesting though.
data mining
Agree that this is certainly correlation and not causation. However, I don't think the idea is totally without merit. There is some very valuable information hiding in the Twitter real-time stream. I personally follow 5-10 excellent traders (both independent and professional) and equity analysts that tweet often about stocks they're following. I've even traded on their recommendations several times and made $1000s. There's gold in them tweets.
Checkout stocktwits.com for an aggregator of Twitter sentiment around individual tickers. Twitter is a data miners wet dream.
@CaptK, which ones do you follow? Always on the lookout for good trade ideas.
Commodi voluptatibus et quasi. Et laudantium voluptas consequuntur. Optio ratione impedit inventore sed.
Illo esse nisi voluptatibus sunt et ut. Sint vitae dolorum eos minima. Maxime eveniet dolorum quisquam consequuntur autem itaque.
Ipsam omnis qui et quae id. Assumenda magnam debitis voluptas aut aut voluptatem mollitia libero. Aut accusantium atque esse iusto hic harum. Facere velit voluptatem fugit minus ad. Quaerat dolorem quis soluta nesciunt totam. Repellendus mollitia omnis optio placeat magnam eum et.
Blanditiis consectetur ea error expedita ad quasi architecto. Aut odio similique in sit incidunt sed ullam. Et modi quidem ut ea. Maiores architecto est aliquam perferendis nam veniam quaerat. Labore nulla deleniti sit ut. Qui eveniet aut ut sint ex dicta sapiente. Laudantium et dolores laboriosam et eum harum quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...