Corporate Tax Loopholes Are Killing Us

I've long been opposed to a flat tax or the so called "Fair Tax" on the basis that once you grant the government the ability to levy a consumption tax then it's probably just a matter of time before they ratchet the rate up to the stratosphere. What might start as a 20% flat tax today could be 30% or even 40% a decade from now. But when I see things like the following video, it makes me re-think my objections. Our tax code is so complicated that the only people who don't get screwed by it are the people or corporations who can afford an army of tax commandos to handle their business. Maybe a flat tax is the way to go.

 

I'd just like to see the U.S. switch to a lower corporate tax rate but get rid of all these loopholes. Get it down to 15% or so. The current U.S. effective corporate tax rate is 13.4%. That means the corporate tax rates of 33% go down by more than half because our businesses know that our politicians are nothing more than whores that will give them anything they want for the right price.

 

When a patient has cancer, you treat the cancer and not the symptoms.

Arguing over what is the right amount is wasted time.

Rather we should be questioning why we pay taxes in the first place.

Nip it in the bud. Get government out of our lives and we will solve our tax problem.

 
ladubs111:
monaco1:
When a patient has cancer, you treat the cancer and not the symptoms.

Arguing over what is the right amount is wasted time.

Rather we should be questioning why we pay taxes in the first place.

Nip it in the bud. Get government out of our lives and we will solve our tax problem.

Move to Central Africa then.

didn't know they let retarded children on this website

 
ladubs111:
monaco1:
When a patient has cancer, you treat the cancer and not the symptoms.

Arguing over what is the right amount is wasted time.

Rather we should be questioning why we pay taxes in the first place.

Nip it in the bud. Get government out of our lives and we will solve our tax problem.

Move to Central Africa then.

Typical uninformed comment. Whenever someone advocates for less government intrusion you always see these type of people jump to the most extreme conclusion that less government = no government.

If you think what we currently have is optimal you aren't looking around. Less government would be less costly and provide more freedom.

As for the topic of this thread, I agree that we should eliminate loop holes, for everyone. Makes me sick to think that part of my taxes goes to support people who have children, own homes, pay interest on student loans, etc. Remove all of these deductions, have a progressive system with a limited government.

Done and Done.

 
Best Response
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/trilantic-north-america>TNA</a></span>:
ladubs111:
monaco1:
When a patient has cancer, you treat the cancer and not the symptoms.

Arguing over what is the right amount is wasted time.

Rather we should be questioning why we pay taxes in the first place.

Nip it in the bud. Get government out of our lives and we will solve our tax problem.

Move to Central Africa then.

Typical uninformed comment. Whenever someone advocates for less government intrusion you always see these type of people jump to the most extreme conclusion that less government = no government.

If you think what we currently have is optimal you aren't looking around. Less government would be less costly and provide more freedom.

As for the topic of this thread, I agree that we should eliminate loop holes, for everyone. Makes me sick to think that part of my taxes goes to support people who have children, own homes, pay interest on student loans, etc. Remove all of these deductions, have a progressive system with a limited government.

Done and Done.

I dunno man, 80 billion a year to a great government agency like the department of education sounds good to me.

You're born, you take shit. You get out in the world, you take more shit. You climb a little higher, you take less shit. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what shit even looks like. Welcome to the layer cake, son.
 
DrizzyDrake:
monaco1:

Rather we should be questioning why we pay taxes in the first place.

If someone has to explain that to you, you're hopeless.

No, other way around. We all should question why we pay and what does the money get spent on. Everyone who pays taxes has the right and obligation to question this.

 
DrizzyDrake:
monaco1:

Rather we should be questioning why we pay taxes in the first place.

If someone has to explain that to you, you're hopeless.

tsk tsk poor thing i can't even begin to imagine what it would be like to have an undeveloped brain like yours

 
monaco1][quote=TNA]I know man. Thank you Jimmy Carter. What a clown.</p> <p>But how dare you question why we pay taxes. I mean America's educational system has continually improved since the advent of the Dept of Education.</p> <p><a href=http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb108/hb108-28.pdf[/quote rel=nofollow>http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb108/hb108-28.pdf[/quote</a>:

knowing that logically thinking people like yourself still exist gives me hope for this website and humanity

Yeah man, well people like us are few and far between. Too many of the sheep cry out to the government to parent their lives. You would get more utility burning $100B than you get by having the unconstitutional Dept of Education.

 

I don't see why people don't make an effort to make improvements to the current system. My perception is that if people entertain an impossible fantasy, they don't ever have to really make an effort to engage in reality....they can always cop out and say that "since my version of reality isn't happening, it's not my fault". And I don't buy that. Just like our monetary system, the tax system worked fine until people started mismanaging it: lousy managemeng will screw up any other system put in place, so why not address the lousy management? And as Carlin once pointed out, this nation hates its politicians, but we elect them....so who is really to blame here? The average person is so partisan that they've convinced themselves that the other half of the coutry is the problem....but I think that's not true. And I think a lot of people know this, but it's easier to play the blame game.

IMO, a flat tax is about as relevant as the gold standard: it's easy and simple to think about, but the reality is that it's a very inferior system. I question the judgement of people who disagree: shall we reinstate the divine right of kings, go back to the horse and buggy, or renounce our knowledge of astronomy and just all agree that the earth is flat? No, that would be....ignorant.

TNA]I mean America's educational system has continually improved since the advent of the Dept of Education.</p> <p><a href=http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb108/hb108-28.pdf[/quote rel=nofollow>http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb108/hb108-28.pdf[/quote</a>] That's clever, I'd put it in the same category of research (wink wink nod nod) as the Phillip Morris scientists 'proving' that smoking has no bad influence on health. How about working to make something perform better instead of blocking all progress while calling to dismantle it. Before widespread education, the average person was barely able to write their name...is that really a great reality to return to?? [quote=TNA:
We all should question ... what does the money get spent on. Everyone who pays taxes has the right and obligation to question this.
This is where public debate is, yes? What the taxes are and what it's spent on is most of that conversation. Am I missing something here? (rhetorical question)
monaco1:
Rather we should be questioning why we pay taxes in the first place.
To fund what the gov't does. If you want to dismantle the gov't, cool, me and my gang will run my block. I have an AK47 and I decide to make myself king, next we're going to conquer the next town over No? Doesn't sound good? Ok, so some sort of gov't is needed. That costs money. For more, take US Gov't 101 or read a book. I definitely think that it can be cut down in some places and made more efficient in others....focus on that. But his whole infatuation with dismantling the government is delusional: realistically, that's not going to happen, so get real or kindly stop gumming up the conversation. Open letter to all extreme anarchists: you are ignored. Grow up.

As for flat tax: this idea won't get any traction for a bunch of reasons, and this debate has been beaten to death. Look at the countries that use a full flat tax system: for the most part, they're barely above third world nation status. In addittion, rich people/companies can afford accountants and lawyers that will beat the flat tax system as well.

As for ANT's comment on people owning houses or having kids: those are deductions. It's one thing to acknowledge a tax rate and then get a discount because the govt (aka....people) value those things, it's another thing all together to set up my "headquarters" in another region and funnel money through there. Also, flat tax systems in use in other countries have both deduction allowances and people/companies beating the system on havens.

In other news, most people posting on this thread have already made up their minds, so anything else is rather futile....yes? No one is here to actually open their mind and learn the different theories, they're here to push their own opinion.

Why bother? It's always the same.

Get busy living
 
UFOinsider]I don't see why people don't make an effort to make improvements to the current system. My perception is that if people entertain an impossible fantasy, they don't ever have to really make an effort to engage in reality....they can always cop out and say that since my version of reality isn't happening, it's not my fault. And I don't buy that. Just like our monetary system, the tax system worked fine until people started mismanaging it: lousy managemeng will screw up any other system put in place, so why not address the lousy management? And as Carlin once pointed out, this nation hates its politicians, but we elect them....so who is really to blame here? The average person is so partisan that they've convinced themselves that the <em>other half</em> of the coutry is the problem....but I think that's not true. And I think a lot of people know this, but it's easier to play the blame game.</p> <p>IMO, a flat tax is about as relevant as the gold standard: it's easy and simple to think about, but the reality is that it's a very inferior system. I question the judgement of people who disagree: shall we reinstate the divine right of kings, go back to the horse and buggy, or renounce our knowledge of astronomy and just all agree that the earth is flat? No, that would be....ignorant. [quote=TNA]I mean America's educational system has continually improved since the advent of the Dept of Education.</p> <p><a href=http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb108/hb108-28.pdf[/quote rel=nofollow>http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb108/hb108-28.pdf[/quote</a>:
That's clever, I'd put it in the same category of "research" (wink wink nod nod) as the Phillip Morris scientists 'proving' that smoking has no bad influence on health. How about working to make something perform better instead of blocking all progress while calling to dismantle it. Before widespread education, the average person was barely able to write their name...is that really a great reality to return to??
TNA:
We all should question ... what does the money get spent on. Everyone who pays taxes has the right and obligation to question this.
This is where public debate is, yes? What the taxes are and what it's spent on is most of that conversation. Am I missing something here? (rhetorical question)
monaco1:
Rather we should be questioning why we pay taxes in the first place.
To fund what the gov't does. If you want to dismantle the gov't, cool, me and my gang will run my block. I have an AK47 and I decide to make myself king, next we're going to conquer the next town over No? Doesn't sound good? Ok, so some sort of gov't is needed. That costs money. For more, take US Gov't 101 or read a book. I definitely think that it can be cut down in some places and made more efficient in others....focus on that. But his whole infatuation with dismantling the government is delusional: realistically, that's not going to happen, so get real or kindly stop gumming up the conversation. Open letter to all extreme anarchists: you are ignored. Grow up.

As for flat tax: this idea won't get any traction for a bunch of reasons, and this debate has been beaten to death. Look at the countries that use a full flat tax system: for the most part, they're barely above third world nation status. In addittion, rich people/companies can afford accountants and lawyers that will beat the flat tax system as well.

As for ANT's comment on people owning houses or having kids: those are deductions. It's one thing to acknowledge a tax rate and then get a discount because the govt (aka....people) value those things, it's another thing all together to set up my "headquarters" in another region and funnel money through there. Also, flat tax systems in use in other countries have both deduction allowances and people/companies beating the system on havens.

In other news, most people posting on this thread have already made up their minds, so anything else is rather futile....yes? No one is here to actually open their mind and learn the different theories, they're here to push their own opinion.

Why bother? It's always the same.

all I will say is that if you are well read, you would understand the context behind my simple statements.

 

Expedita facere non repellendus. Distinctio et cupiditate cum esse officiis iste enim praesentium. Perspiciatis eaque quia doloribus ipsam. Quo quaerat harum omnis quasi voluptas ut. Quod qui et non quaerat sit enim et.

Hic cumque error voluptatum ab. Fugit velit atque saepe.

Culpa qui molestiae sit est et omnis. Sed assumenda omnis totam velit. Labore ipsa ratione ipsam reprehenderit repellat quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”