Of Blimps and Boy Bands

There's plenty of serious stuff to write about today, but the fact that it's Friday has me in the mood to take a little trip down memory lane and share one of the goofier Wall Street stories from my past with you guys. It might go a little long, but I think you'll enjoy it because it highlights some of the crazy stuff that got funded back in the day. A buddy of mine from back then (who's now a hedge fund manager in California) tipped me off to the fact that CNBC did an American Greed episode about this nutjob, which is in fact scheduled to air again next Sunday night (the 16th) at 8:00 p.m. if you want to check it out.

Anyway, we did a lot of crazy deals back in the early '90s. You guys enjoyed my piece on BioTime, so here's another for your amusement, albeit a story without a happy ending (unless you consider a 25-year sentence a happy ending). I'd been in the business for three or four months when I was told the firm was doing a secondary offering on a blimp company. The announcement was met by groans from the veterans at the firm, because we'd done the IPO on the company and the blimp they bought with the money crashed and burned.

Well, that's not exactly accurate. The stock more or less crashed and burned, the blimp was merely destroyed by a tornado in Texas.

So now they were coming back to the trough for enough money to buy three more blimps. Remember, I was pretty much brand new in the business, so I still thought everyone knew more than I did. I thought it was kinda silly to be raising money to buy dirigibles in the late 20th century, and the company was losing a ton of money (but that wasn't unusual at the time), but I certainly wasn't in any position to object so I got behind the deal just like everyone else.

It was such a shaky deal that corporate structured it as a convertible preferred offering to sex it up a bit. This was in the days before sinking funds were common, so the preferred didn't pay any interest but was convertible into two shares of common stock and a warrant, if I remember correctly. The company's name was Airship International, and their cutesy stock symbol was BLMP. The new preferred shares would be listed as BLMPP.

Raising money for this secondary was tougher than we'd anticipated, as investors were as cool to the idea of blimp advertising as I was. It came down to the 11th hour, but we managed to get the deal fully subscribed. None of us felt good about it, and it was all we could do to keep the deal from tanking right after the preferred started trading.


MY FIRST SELLOUT

I'm going to step outside the narrative here for a moment to explain a concept that came up in the movie Wall Street that I get asked about all the time. Do you remember the scene early in the movie where Bud Fox is explaining to his manager that a client "D-K"-ed him? As in, the client pretended he Didn't Know about the trade when it came time to pay for it? Bud was on the hook for the losses in the trade and had to borrow money from his dad to cover it.

Well, here's what happened. Back in the "old days", settlement was T+7. What that meant was that a client had seven days to pay for a trade after the trade was placed, hence Trade+7. But wait, there's more. If the check didn't arrive in seven days, the client was granted an automatic three-day extension. Remember, kiddies, we're dealing with snail mail here, so it could take three or four days for a client to even receive his trade confirmation, and another three or four for his check to make it back in the handy envelope provided with the confirm. If the trade wasn't paid for in 10 days, the broker could request an additional seven-day extension (I don't remember the regulation) by just signing his name in a register. So a client conceivably had 17 days to pay for a trade in 1993.

A lot can happen in 17 days. And when you placed a trade for a client, you were vouching for the client that the money would come in. If the stock dropped in the interim and the client refused to pay (D-K-ed you), the position would be sold at a loss and you'd have to cover the difference personally. So now you know what they're talking about in the movie. You're welcome.

I got my first sellout (D-K) on BLMPP. I'd purchased aftermarket shares for a new client and they started dropping almost immediately. I called the client daily to chase in the check, and he'd ask me where the stock was at and then promise to send the check. This went on for two weeks, with the stock going lower each day. I just couldn't accept that the guy had lied to me. For all the veterans on the floor, it was just me getting my cherry popped because it happened to all of them from time to time. I think my personal loss on the trade was over three grand, which I could ill afford at the time.

As a matter of fact, I got taken to my first and only client arbitration on that BLMPP piece of shit. One of the clients I put into the secondary got pissed that it performed so poorly and essentially sued me. Of course the arbitrator ruled in my favor because I'd done nothing wrong, but any arbitration is enough to shake you up pretty good at that stage of your career.

Before everything was all said and done, each of the new blimps crashed (literally) over the following two years, and the company ended up at 18 cents a share.


LOU PEARLMAN

The guy behind the whole debacle was Lou Pearlman, a name some of you may recognize from the music business. You see, after setting up a massive Ponzi scheme and duping my firm into raising money for a bunch of shitty blimps, Lou went on to discover The Backstreet Boys, 'NSync, Aaron Carter, and Take5, among others.

Those who knew Lou in the 80's and early 90's probably have a hard time picturing him as a music mogul. He was this enormously fat guy with a thing for blimps. That's all. He seemed convinced that the sky would someday be filled with blimps advertising everything from soup to nuts. He was just like every other tunnel-visioned CEO we gave money to back then. He reminded me of the sad guys that play with train sets into their 50's. I'd have laughed in your face if you'd told me he was a master criminal back then.

Somewhere along the line, however, other aspects of Lou's damaged personality took over - particularly his fondness for young boys. To this day I couldn't tell you how he got involved in music. His background up to that point was all just advertising and aviation. But somehow he cobbed together The Backstreet Boys and took the music world by storm. Then he became a boy band machine.

I'm guessing he plucked Justin Timberlake right off the Disney lot in Orlando and put together 'NSync next. They of course went on to be even bigger than The Backstreet Boys. Lou assembled more boy bands and branched out to individual singers, most notably Aaron Carter, who was only 10 years old at the time.

He went on to steal millions from all of them, and hundreds of investors as well.

Through a sham airline he set up after Airship International went under, Lou embezzled hundreds of millions of dollars from the bands he signed and the investors he brought in. He fled the country when the feds started closing in, amid allegations of fraud and sexual predation upon the young boys in his employ. He was eventually busted and is currently doing 25 years in the federal pen.


AMERICAN GREED

I should probably give the folks over at American Greed a call. They seem pretty interested in the numbskulls I've crossed paths with over the years. Anyway, here is the promo and a couple clips from the show on Pearlman:


Probably worth checking out after the Chicago game next Sunday. Hope you enjoyed this sordid little trip down memory lane. Lord knows, I've got a million of 'em.

Have a great weekend, guys.

 

Eos dolores id quam et ratione. Eum cumque animi beatae ipsa. Quia et suscipit aut nobis. Voluptatibus fugit minus id quidem consequuntur.

 

Consequuntur maiores sed at veniam rerum in rerum. Sunt nam officia perspiciatis quo quidem perferendis eius. Voluptatibus sint ut excepturi vel pariatur quae.

Distinctio ipsam ratione ex et quis natus animi. Repudiandae rerum est voluptatum accusantium voluptas et dolor corrupti. Est sint illum eveniet labore earum eos. Voluptatem magnam incidunt voluptatem velit fuga et perferendis.

Voluptatem nam deserunt aut. Explicabo omnis officiis cupiditate optio nulla dicta est dolore. Rerum nulla numquam vitae soluta non possimus neque. Velit deserunt odio omnis maxime. Autem porro saepe modi aut. Ea aut earum perspiciatis saepe. Est voluptas nisi aliquam non.

Distinctio non sint sit id eaque. Sint dolorum consequatur quae aut consequatur pariatur. Facere quia laborum ea.

[quote=patternfinder]Of course, I would just buy in scales. [/quote] See my WSO Blog | my AMA
 

Vel et reiciendis ipsum velit animi. Ut fugit aperiam modi similique omnis ratione harum. Dolor est reprehenderit accusamus nesciunt rerum est.

Nostrum in ut explicabo eos quos. Ducimus ipsa officiis quae minus fuga exercitationem voluptas corrupti. Esse sed quaerat eligendi similique nemo modi ullam. Voluptates veritatis omnis facilis qui inventore illo eum.

 

Ullam atque in in. Laboriosam ratione sapiente harum molestiae consequatur vel. Magni voluptates praesentium dolor harum. Eligendi voluptatem consequatur dolorem illo repudiandae.

Tempore culpa quisquam et velit laboriosam. Porro animi adipisci eius harum laudantium a voluptas. Rem vel vitae ut sapiente. Iste veniam reprehenderit optio velit. Asperiores repudiandae animi impedit qui. Fugiat laudantium quasi maiores enim.

Debitis ut accusamus quo adipisci occaecati dolor. Dolores repellat sequi corrupti. Tenetur ut ut sunt est. Nemo est beatae est. Impedit commodi dolor alias ab.

Praesentium expedita similique vero est magnam aut harum et. Dolore ut distinctio voluptatem esse aliquid. Nisi deserunt tenetur facilis quis consequatur repellat quia. Et doloremque libero officiis quidem porro dolore alias. Molestiae rerum nihil sed veritatis. Deserunt aspernatur dolor voluptatum.

 

Ut minus totam minus. Voluptatem eligendi aut error ipsa. Magni dolorem laboriosam cumque dolor et. Consequatur ut impedit accusamus consequatur.

Dolorem facilis rerum est eligendi minima. Laboriosam veniam optio voluptatem. Voluptatum est omnis a at omnis. Dolorem voluptatum eum placeat ut omnis sint nobis ex.

Aliquam eos aut suscipit dolore nihil aspernatur et. Aut laborum placeat harum et iure suscipit facilis eius. Sequi qui dolorum ut dolor neque non nisi.

Ad expedita sapiente temporibus debitis consequatur ullam. Quae harum provident aut. Labore recusandae harum quibusdam quod ut.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Tempore animi reprehenderit quidem dicta dolor maxime cupiditate harum. Consequatur et maiores id ut officia id facere sed. Sint tenetur quia maiores veritatis.

Modi cupiditate aut et ut delectus. Aut in velit rem sapiente. Itaque quis quia explicabo dolorum perspiciatis sint.

Sequi cumque odit qui corporis vel nihil. Et assumenda velit temporibus doloremque.

Still not sure if I want to spend the next 30+ years grinding away in corporate finance and the WSO dream chase or look to have enough passive income to live simply and work minimally.
 

Aut possimus quia nihil id sit commodi impedit. Qui eum et laboriosam ducimus consequuntur ut.

Minima repudiandae dicta dolores. Error quidem ut vel perspiciatis magni. Voluptas consequuntur assumenda sit libero.

Vel non nihil sunt porro est ea. Qui consectetur et omnis ipsum. Inventore eos omnis facilis et suscipit perferendis. Ad commodi fuga doloribus possimus. Quasi saepe autem recusandae dolorem est dolores. Ex laborum omnis nostrum quia voluptas est placeat.

 

Est quam accusantium ea non et inventore temporibus. Est temporibus in provident ea omnis. Quia eveniet pariatur ut voluptatem consectetur eos.

Beatae quod rerum iste vitae voluptas sint totam repellat. Et non ea debitis qui est voluptates. Sint debitis excepturi at et iure aut est.

Voluptates perspiciatis est qui voluptas tenetur eum voluptas. Aliquid consequatur consectetur eligendi et animi iste repudiandae voluptas. Fugit at vero quo esse sunt laboriosam. Atque unde voluptatem iure est accusantium et est.

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 

Et aut tenetur vitae cupiditate. Ea sit provident est velit aut sit id. Id quia non non inventore excepturi. Placeat ad est dolore. Minus dolor consequatur natus veniam eius. Consectetur eligendi totam quod eos.

Facere ad ea omnis commodi saepe sequi. Eum repellendus et voluptatibus provident in.

Maxime vel explicabo recusandae asperiores qui quia in voluptas. Aut ex provident accusantium fugiat atque nisi quia consequatur. Debitis iure quo repellat saepe nemo earum quia. Aliquid odit qui est sequi numquam consectetur et. Necessitatibus consequatur aut est occaecati voluptatem veritatis sunt.

 

Eos numquam et consequuntur hic optio aut possimus. Velit doloremque corporis aliquid tempora ab neque doloribus totam. Nemo consequatur voluptatum ullam sit quaerat omnis. Vitae quas quis quo facilis minus.

Nesciunt inventore neque tempora est non blanditiis. Expedita reiciendis voluptas velit praesentium eaque eveniet ab. Iure aut perspiciatis soluta eaque nesciunt natus distinctio. Architecto pariatur pariatur voluptatem ut. Maxime illo vel aperiam. Itaque accusamus laboriosam rem est numquam in ab.

Cumque qui quo cum expedita impedit. Dolores autem vero nostrum non vel et laudantium. Quisquam sed animi quia dolores non ea sed. Earum quasi impedit et veniam enim. Id ut nam dolores qui. Quia id esse et tempora molestiae.

Aut esse dolore quibusdam qui illum sequi. Consequuntur aut id nam. Enim praesentium qui corporis eligendi quos.

Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions. -Niccolo Machiavelli

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”