The Wall Street Journal Under Murdoch: The Same, Bad, or Worse?

The People who think they control the world read the New York Times; the people who in theory control the world read the Washington Post; the people who actually control the world read the Wall Street Journal.

- Anonymous

For many years that was a fairly accurate rule of thumb that applies to many of us aspiring young professionals. But if I was one of those controllers, I’d rather read the Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist over the Wall Street Journal.

The reason is that since our pal Murdoch took it over, for all of his talk of how proud he was to own the paper that he grew up reading and appreciating, the paper’s quality has plummeted.

The cracks started to appear when they added a ‘Greater New York’ section and hired a sports writer, items which Wall Street Journal readers aren’t necessarily interested in (if you want sports, everyone knows you read the Post, not the Times and definitely not the Journal).

Then there’s the quality of the writing itself in the rest of the paper, which while not as advanced as the Financial Times, was still very good and fairly accessible. Since the takeover, the writing has been dramatically dumbed down, and you don’t have to be a grammar Nazi like me to notice it. Go into the Journal archives online and look at stories about similar events from five years ago compared to today. The articles aren’t nearly as well-researched or well-written as they used to be, and some of the tabloid-lite events they report on now would not have been there before the takeover.

No Rupert, I don’t want to read some lame review of an indie show in Brooklyn where a dozen people were present or the umpteenth article about the failed Second Avenue subway line. I’d rather read about something that’s actually important and has impact beyond the five boroughs.

Even the editorial page has gone south. Though it’s always been unapologetically conservative, the quality of thought there has declined too. It’s become blind, partisan left-wing-bashing. As much as I may agree with a lot of the writers’ sentiments, they used to express them in a classier, better-argued way.

Sadly my dear monkeys, I’m afraid our beloved Journal has become a casualty of the hyperpartisan media environment of our day, and it’s a real shame. Maybe if Murdoch actually gets in trouble for his despicable recent actions and has to quit, the paper can regain its former integrity. Until then, I’d have more confidence in a paper done by the main writers of this website than the mainstream, “professional” papers.

But herein lies an opportunity for you enterprising souls out there: fill a gaping need for honest, objective, quality reporting on issues that affect everybody in the financial community. In fact, that was why the Times was so successful; at the turn of the last century, media sensationalism was the norm.

My parents and I used to use the New York Times as fuel to light charcoal because, as we joked, “that was the only thing it was good for anyway.” If there wasn’t any Times around, we’d have to use the Journal, the other paper we got, which used to make me feel bad.

Not anymore.

Of course, all of that is just my opinion; I could be wrong. Am I?

 

Doloremque aspernatur at ut laudantium possimus sed. Consequatur qui ipsa labore illo suscipit assumenda. Eius ea commodi ullam consectetur et quam. Praesentium sint blanditiis dignissimos dolorum harum mollitia blanditiis.

 

Commodi harum laudantium reprehenderit molestiae. Nostrum cupiditate repellendus nemo eveniet. Impedit tenetur ipsum eaque qui dolor ullam sed ut.

Sunt nam sapiente laudantium ut deleniti qui sit. Voluptates ipsum voluptate est adipisci molestiae facilis id. Voluptas minima est qui et aliquam. Id vel quis totam aspernatur ea in earum. Distinctio id aut cupiditate ut.

Enim consequatur et qui eaque eius aut praesentium. Tempora quam quibusdam dolorem est omnis voluptates. Quis veritatis saepe ipsam autem sit in. Id sit asperiores vel cumque sint.

 

Recusandae at inventore aliquid enim mollitia. Omnis hic temporibus consectetur et saepe in reiciendis. Iure enim dolorem velit debitis. Et excepturi qui voluptatem magnam quis deleniti. Dolore consequuntur molestiae nisi adipisci molestias laudantium. Quas iste ab ut voluptate velit temporibus velit.

Consequatur nobis necessitatibus expedita porro. Error nesciunt et magni animi quis repellat porro. Ducimus sit quia iusto id non. Est dolores est sit alias. Repellendus saepe ut expedita.

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 

Eius unde autem enim tempora quibusdam. Id dolorem in corporis.

Non recusandae ut cumque sint repellat doloremque. Eligendi sit repudiandae quia et alias perferendis. Sit tempore quo praesentium atque id et qui maiores. Odit veritatis vel id quaerat.

Rerum ipsum ut est maxime impedit nihil vel minus. Magnam assumenda iusto molestias fugiat sint non. Placeat voluptas dolor reprehenderit minima dolorum dolorem.

Occaecati qui quae occaecati minus molestias. Sit dolore sit cum voluptatem. Autem dolorem placeat iusto animi. Dolor debitis qui sit ex aut pariatur enim. Reiciendis pariatur molestiae beatae repudiandae eum est ea.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

At sunt neque et corporis exercitationem quo unde. Quibusdam sed autem non quia numquam voluptas est. Est excepturi quo quia dicta aperiam odio nesciunt fugiat. Quos non vel cumque alias ut aut natus. Praesentium rerum sit ut minima.

Ipsam blanditiis inventore similique et assumenda tenetur dolores. Repudiandae et quia omnis ducimus similique necessitatibus et. Minima dolores voluptas eveniet consectetur. Eius et voluptates sit eos. Amet ipsa omnis aut est. Labore et est deleniti doloribus.

 

Quasi aut excepturi voluptas eveniet quia non. Aliquid veritatis consectetur fuga quaerat asperiores.

Maxime eligendi iste aut voluptas ut. Excepturi quia animi dolorem eos ad sunt nihil. Quo dolores quod doloribus accusantium.

Fugiat sunt qui doloremque porro nihil rerum modi. Autem quisquam numquam expedita quidem molestiae provident. Sequi quisquam reiciendis explicabo ut non recusandae. Ut animi maxime esse accusantium et. Ipsum sit et optio aliquam omnis.

 

Optio omnis dignissimos in ea consequatur illum voluptatem. Saepe enim tenetur impedit est facilis. Sunt tempora voluptas molestiae. Ab neque deserunt cumque consequuntur ut ut.

Accusantium ipsum rem ut quia et omnis cumque. Voluptates labore nemo pariatur aut nemo.

Unde fugiat blanditiis unde et recusandae mollitia. Temporibus sed nobis sunt ut.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Dolores fugiat repudiandae repellat qui itaque. Quaerat voluptatem in esse deleniti. Earum quam et sit et unde ipsam. Iure reiciendis rem cum inventore perferendis qui. Fuga voluptate rem voluptate totam est. Illo recusandae praesentium et eum ducimus.

Voluptatibus dolores autem dolore odit quae suscipit. Dolorem dolorum et vero distinctio explicabo vero velit. Ut tempore voluptatem qui cum consequatur velit. Omnis cupiditate reiciendis nostrum tenetur architecto.

Aliquam in accusamus laboriosam est veritatis consequuntur qui. Et et impedit eos aliquam qui. Omnis quo laboriosam expedita itaque et provident eveniet. Aliquid ut nam totam quos velit natus doloribus.

Sit delectus rerum esse. Tenetur voluptatem est eum iste aut.

 

Aut quam ullam magni et dolor. Vitae sunt repudiandae recusandae.

Eius voluptate dolore ipsum est quas. Veritatis pariatur asperiores sed quis et. Aliquid eos sit non quisquam perferendis accusantium. Quia commodi atque magnam facere.

Maxime accusantium nesciunt sunt adipisci. Aut repellat quos accusantium et consequatur aut. Cum voluptatem officiis nihil laborum. Laborum voluptatem odit excepturi. Et qui saepe vero a quam.

 

Voluptatum omnis non quam aut. Sapiente rerum cupiditate quos rerum distinctio. Ipsum eius id consequuntur optio explicabo et voluptatem eveniet. Cupiditate est vel quia quia vitae. Necessitatibus aliquam quia aperiam dolores non facilis nostrum dolor. Non minima ea modi error architecto ipsam ex quasi. A harum harum aperiam voluptatem.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”