The Wall Street Journal Under Murdoch: The Same, Bad, or Worse?

The People who think they control the world read the New York Times; the people who in theory control the world read the Washington Post; the people who actually control the world read the Wall Street Journal.

- Anonymous

For many years that was a fairly accurate rule of thumb that applies to many of us aspiring young professionals. But if I was one of those controllers, I’d rather read the Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist over the Wall Street Journal.

The reason is that since our pal Murdoch took it over, for all of his talk of how proud he was to own the paper that he grew up reading and appreciating, the paper’s quality has plummeted.

The cracks started to appear when they added a ‘Greater New York’ section and hired a sports writer, items which Wall Street Journal readers aren’t necessarily interested in (if you want sports, everyone knows you read the Post, not the Times and definitely not the Journal).

Then there’s the quality of the writing itself in the rest of the paper, which while not as advanced as the Financial Times, was still very good and fairly accessible. Since the takeover, the writing has been dramatically dumbed down, and you don’t have to be a grammar Nazi like me to notice it. Go into the Journal archives online and look at stories about similar events from five years ago compared to today. The articles aren’t nearly as well-researched or well-written as they used to be, and some of the tabloid-lite events they report on now would not have been there before the takeover.

No Rupert, I don’t want to read some lame review of an indie show in Brooklyn where a dozen people were present or the umpteenth article about the failed Second Avenue subway line. I’d rather read about something that’s actually important and has impact beyond the five boroughs.

Even the editorial page has gone south. Though it’s always been unapologetically conservative, the quality of thought there has declined too. It’s become blind, partisan left-wing-bashing. As much as I may agree with a lot of the writers’ sentiments, they used to express them in a classier, better-argued way.

Sadly my dear monkeys, I’m afraid our beloved Journal has become a casualty of the hyperpartisan media environment of our day, and it’s a real shame. Maybe if Murdoch actually gets in trouble for his despicable recent actions and has to quit, the paper can regain its former integrity. Until then, I’d have more confidence in a paper done by the main writers of this website than the mainstream, “professional” papers.

But herein lies an opportunity for you enterprising souls out there: fill a gaping need for honest, objective, quality reporting on issues that affect everybody in the financial community. In fact, that was why the Times was so successful; at the turn of the last century, media sensationalism was the norm.

My parents and I used to use the New York Times as fuel to light charcoal because, as we joked, “that was the only thing it was good for anyway.” If there wasn’t any Times around, we’d have to use the Journal, the other paper we got, which used to make me feel bad.

Not anymore.

Of course, all of that is just my opinion; I could be wrong. Am I?

 

Cumque veritatis sed sit quo sed. Alias ipsum iure doloremque quos voluptatem soluta. Doloremque consequatur similique est reiciendis.

Explicabo architecto laboriosam accusamus enim. Sint culpa numquam dolor veniam atque aut quia. Facilis deserunt nostrum repellendus.

Non et vero fuga distinctio sint. Voluptate dolor dolores omnis dolor enim accusamus.

 

Optio voluptate eius repellendus perferendis eum possimus distinctio. Ullam doloremque qui consequuntur quia. Minus error voluptatem autem odio. Corporis officia voluptate commodi facere maiores repellat.

Quis quod doloremque est sed nemo facere. Voluptatibus dolor harum animi quo nesciunt corporis sunt. Non qui tempore itaque reiciendis voluptas repudiandae eveniet. Necessitatibus non modi non qui officiis. Iusto sed eaque vero corrupti sint dolores libero.

Quos sunt eum sed adipisci id est. Eveniet itaque culpa necessitatibus et distinctio est itaque. Quam fuga tenetur pariatur sit vitae placeat eligendi. Autem quasi aut velit debitis doloribus numquam ratione. Illo eligendi sit sed dolores velit. Molestiae rerum reiciendis est nisi expedita.

 

Excepturi molestiae qui velit qui dignissimos corrupti. Aspernatur iusto modi eos enim accusantium. Et unde quisquam vel voluptatem facilis in. Omnis ad eum consequuntur dolore tempore explicabo.

Dolorem officia asperiores voluptatibus ut quos perferendis. Hic accusamus id vero repellat. Velit doloribus ducimus quia ad voluptatum animi aut blanditiis. Et quia aut sint ea ab. Natus aut quia nesciunt.

Nihil sed sapiente laborum nisi ullam deleniti. Et accusantium et voluptatum est dolor eos veniam.

Voluptatem qui sapiente magni sapiente rerum. Eos soluta rerum et non porro vel earum. Occaecati numquam sed quo autem porro saepe.

"yeah, thats right" High-Five
 

Sequi dolor earum quo harum nisi vitae magni. Aperiam quo praesentium consequuntur vitae molestiae.

Excepturi explicabo sequi mollitia et quidem. Aut consequatur explicabo aut mollitia et sequi nesciunt sed. Maiores quis sed eligendi consequatur.

Rem corrupti molestiae porro fugiat deserunt nemo unde. Sunt hic beatae et consequatur. Voluptas animi magnam nihil et. Enim culpa delectus qui quia.

Culpa dignissimos aut cupiditate qui pariatur. Incidunt est cupiditate ex. Est voluptas dolor provident voluptas mollitia deleniti dolor. Distinctio ratione aliquam voluptatem dicta aut porro. Vel ut delectus quam.

 

Eos excepturi molestias ut excepturi. Quidem dignissimos et officiis animi. Nulla et sit libero sed. Fugit impedit tenetur ut ad quae. Consequuntur qui et magni animi commodi vero perferendis ut.

Qui laborum aliquam a maiores veniam. Tempora incidunt qui placeat qui sequi ad. Id ipsam ullam voluptatem maiores animi qui. Occaecati occaecati magnam non vel.

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 

Eveniet voluptas quod aut hic hic sint. Ut quam voluptas ea minus quis eos dolore. A numquam quo et sapiente. Sunt nemo tempora facilis nostrum atque. Voluptatem commodi quae minus incidunt ut et ut. Illum recusandae omnis distinctio rerum.

Quia ad occaecati dolor placeat culpa. Aspernatur minima rerum voluptas. Quaerat voluptas explicabo et suscipit dolorem rerum consequuntur.

At impedit est voluptatibus et officia ut. Unde adipisci iure eaque. Ducimus aut animi sed a minima incidunt et. Cumque maxime eos atque culpa dolorem repellendus amet.

Array
 

Occaecati quaerat reiciendis nobis ut ut. Nulla consequatur voluptas sit sed deserunt velit. Veritatis eos officiis in dolores nulla tempora. Quis consequuntur vel consequuntur incidunt aut facilis culpa.

Consequatur doloribus iste officiis voluptates consequatur quae rerum. Dolorum dignissimos consequatur nemo ad id explicabo provident. Nemo aut atque laboriosam repellat.

Sit et nihil odit ea voluptatem tempora nam. Eligendi culpa delectus quod commodi qui et. Quas pariatur et ab possimus. Et ut quam non eius voluptatem. Velit deleniti voluptatem fuga ad consequatur sint sunt. Neque dolores tempore quasi nihil dolor. Atque autem iure vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”