U.S. Goes to Bat for Goldman's Black Box
Federal prosecutors have filed an unusual request in the case against former Goldman Sachs programmer Sergey Aleynikov - they want the courtroom cleared. As in, no outside witnesses. No press, no gallery, and they've also requested that all records of the trial be sealed.
lawyer specializing in trade-secret cases for the New York law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The government has to show that "this is something that is so secret that it will cause harm to [Goldman] if it were made public," she said.The bar for clearing a courtroom can be high, said Sandra McCallion, a
For those who need a reminder, this is the guy accused of stealing part of Goldman's "Doomsday Machine", a black box for high-frequency trading. Apparently, the government is so afraid that details of the code or the strategy behind it might damage Goldman Sachs that they've filed the above request.
High-frequency trading is in the news a lot these days. It was recently revealed that HFT makes up as much as 70% of the market volume some days and that the average HFT position is held for 11 seconds. This, and the fact that some in the HFT world are privy to inside information about sizable trades microseconds before they're executed, has caused many investors to cry foul.
Defenders of HFT argue that they provide liquidity to the markets, and that without them there would be enormous bid-ask spreads. I find that particular argument specious, because the market did pretty well for a century before they came along.
However, I think it's naive to think that HFT isn't here to stay. Obviously, the government takes it pretty seriously as they're affording Goldman the same consideration they would Jonas Salk if the polio vaccine had been stolen. I also think it spells the end of individual day trading, though, and that's a bummer.
Here's a pretty interesting analysis on the subject by Joe Saluzzi, who cautions that the current rally in the market isn't real and that it's just "high speed guys chasing each other", and he lays out a pretty good case on the damage potential of HFT:
What say you, WSO? In favor or against HFT? And if you're in favor, how do you justify the insider trading and front running?
Tempora est minus voluptate ut fugiat. Est ea aut aliquam non tenetur placeat.
Suscipit saepe atque quia rerum asperiores. Et id qui dolorem expedita iure quidem omnis. Aspernatur enim quia voluptas explicabo nostrum provident.
Enim ipsa hic quis. Quibusdam qui praesentium laborum nam. Pariatur eum doloremque reiciendis consectetur odit aut ut repellat. In repellendus doloribus ut et. Eligendi sed natus consequuntur voluptatem accusantium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Hic accusantium ut cum sed et aut atque et. Qui sed nisi voluptate modi excepturi ducimus non. Animi cumque autem et. Est tempora quo sunt ipsam. Non consectetur earum aut error eum. Voluptas nulla eos accusamus sed culpa officia eveniet eius.
Cupiditate ea assumenda mollitia dolor voluptate tempore. Et deleniti ea nihil neque praesentium eum. Aut facilis et nam aperiam nobis laboriosam quia optio. Exercitationem nostrum aut placeat. Deleniti et accusantium nam sunt. Expedita minima aut rerum architecto qui vel omnis.
Velit et incidunt nesciunt. Labore iure ea voluptatem odit quibusdam aut eos.
Vero sint qui velit reiciendis quia voluptatem. Pariatur dolorum omnis delectus voluptatem voluptas. Maxime et consequatur explicabo accusantium ipsa. Alias autem nihil et ut necessitatibus neque quod.
Atque vero animi ut tenetur amet dolorem. Accusamus quia expedita voluptatem consequuntur ullam. Ut provident aut rerum laudantium cumque blanditiis. Autem autem similique iusto officiis consequuntur.
Beatae cumque molestiae rerum natus et. Veniam rerum modi aut consequuntur voluptatem. Voluptatem ea repellat voluptas qui cupiditate. Deserunt corrupti ad deleniti iste et.
Temporibus ab magnam illo impedit suscipit. Sint rerum doloribus blanditiis suscipit porro ipsum laboriosam. Ipsam maiores non culpa ratione sit dolores ut.
Molestiae beatae ea et aut dicta rerum minima. Fugiat autem eveniet est numquam.
Ipsum laudantium deleniti qui. Id blanditiis adipisci odit eaque. Quisquam maiores ut placeat ut. Corporis nemo quia laboriosam delectus voluptatum repudiandae. Quo non voluptatem ut facilis molestiae architecto et. Sed sed qui velit iusto recusandae. Voluptatem nemo necessitatibus officia rerum ut.