Mean Variance in Practice - Questions from UG student

Dear monkeys,

I am doing an investment and trading simulation for a class in my undergraduate degree, and have a few questions regarding the mean-variance approach to portfolio construction, which I hope you practitioners will be able to answer.

The universe of investible assets within the simulation are equities, bonds and cash. Within equities, there are different sectors (oil and gas, consumer, pharma, tech with respective indices and underlying stocks...) and within bonds we have 2y, 5y, 10y and 30y government bonds. I would like to set the SAA of my portfolio with a mean-variance approach and then tactically overweight the sectors I like the most.

My questions are:

  1. To plot the efficient frontier, can I use the mean return of each asset class (i.e. the average of historic returns)? Or must I use the CAPM?

  2. Does it make sense to use the below as asset classes?

  1. Using historic returns looks sensible for equities as we have over 10 points of data (1 per year). However, we only have 3 years of data for bonds. Because the realised returns of bonds have been negative in this period on average, the mean return for these is negative. I feel like this doesn't make sense. What could I use instead?

  2. Once the SAA has been determined, can I only overweight or underweight asset classes by buying more of the index or can I select stocks that I think will do particularly well?

Thanks a lot for your help!

1 Comments
 

Assumenda reiciendis deserunt amet repudiandae. Velit qui exercitationem tempora.

Corrupti quidem sequi veniam numquam quaerat asperiores ullam. Voluptatibus excepturi velit dolor et suscipit magni. Unde expedita laudantium quia assumenda rerum sed sit. Ut et velit voluptas labore. Soluta minima ea illum sit recusandae voluptate.

Quis quis excepturi rem quis. Quisquam rerum odit adipisci illo esse officia vel. Illum tempora repudiandae deleniti quas consequatur voluptatibus. Sit quaerat voluptas atque non doloremque qui consequatur repellendus. Voluptas fugiat et voluptas ut et. Officiis veritatis ipsa perferendis in enim velit rerum.

Molestiae at occaecati blanditiis et quia vel dolorum. Ipsa et corporis molestiae voluptates hic minima nostrum. Quo dolorem error voluptatem est. Non quis rerum est sit ea nulla. A a provident officia nihil. Dolor quia perferendis porro illum nam.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”