Why are MBB/T2 firms hiring so much?

Everywhere I look, it seems like MBB/T2 firms are hiring like crazy.  

  • Every time I go on Linkedin I see MBB consultants posting that their company is hiring

  • One of the T2 firms opened up an additional spring recruiting cycle for undergrads 

  • During my summer internship at MBB, people would talk about how short staffed the firm is ("They would staff anyone at this point" - my manager)

-My MBB firm is starting to recruit at some non target schools (~2 in my class went to the same state school like Rutgers, Penn State, etc... and the recruiting team wants to recruit more from that school)

I get that the economy is hot, but considering they have such selective recruiting cycles, why are these firms in such need of talent? Is it that the turnover is high, or is is more of a demand issue (the firms are generating more business)? Will this lower the quality of future recruiting pools?

 
Most Helpful

Real driver - business is booming right now and there's just a general talent shortage in consulting (and many other fields)

Combine very high demand with temporary reduced hiring in first year of COVID + increased recent attrition as consultants are no longer "professionally sheltering in place" --> hot labor market

Will it lower quality? Increasing # of hires would theoretically mean you're lowering quality, since you're now taking e.g. the 12th best candidate vs cutting off at e.g. the 10th, but in practice it's blurrier since there can be a lot of random chance / close calls in assessing who is the 10th vs 12th best candidate, so I don't know that the bar is really that much lower. I guess you could say that the average quality decreases since candidates e.g. #1-4 will usually be clearly better than the rest and they now represent a smaller portion of the pool, but I don't think it's a huge deal

I wouldn't be worried about recruiting a few kids a year from well-ranked state flagships -- IB and SWE have figured out a long time ago that the most competitive kids from those types of schools do just fine. IMO if anything, those 1-2 kids may do better than average by virtue of having to jump through so many more hoops / face so much more competition to get those 1-2 slots vs somebody who follows an average path at a core target. Whatever the cutoff is, there is definitely a sort of percentile quality rank at which the kids at stage flagships are better than kids are targets, so if a firm feels that they don't get enough great candidates from their core targets then it absolutely makes sense to expand and take the top kids from a couple more schools than the weak candidates from better schools

The bigger issue in quality comes down to how they're trained the first year. Right now, so many strategy consultants are starting in primarily remote environments. This is a big problem for development, since it's a lot easier to coach somebody new in person vs remote, and it's harder to build meaningful relationships

 

Like SC said the economy is hot and there were shortages anyway which Covid only compounded. I've even seen MM IBers from non targets get into MBB which shows how crazy this hiring market is. 

 

Tempore dolor fugiat adipisci nemo maiores. Harum dolorem repellat suscipit suscipit quidem. Accusamus fuga aspernatur et ea ea et est. Molestiae et nam rerum id. Voluptatem tempore aut hic quod cumque. Mollitia et ut quod sed ipsam quia id.

Et iste et minima dolor. Corrupti rerum ipsum ducimus hic sequi. Cupiditate cumque tempore repellendus possimus. Nam ut explicabo velit voluptatem.

Nihil possimus ratione commodi veritatis id temporibus quod. Cum corrupti beatae dolore eligendi. Non similique odit unde quo rerum. Sit et sint quia. Non magni voluptatibus accusamus.

Ut dolores qui omnis mollitia voluptas sit. Accusamus numquam quia ut maiores deserunt deleniti magni. Et labore nemo nostrum omnis enim. Laudantium aperiam et temporibus et nam accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • Cornerstone Research 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.7%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $368
  • Principal (25) $277
  • Director/MD (55) $270
  • Vice President (47) $246
  • Engagement Manager (100) $226
  • Manager (152) $170
  • 2nd Year Associate (158) $140
  • Senior Consultant (331) $130
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (108) $130
  • Consultant (587) $119
  • 1st Year Associate (538) $119
  • NA (15) $119
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (146) $115
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (344) $103
  • Associate Consultant (166) $98
  • 1st Year Analyst (1048) $87
  • Intern/Summer Associate (188) $84
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (551) $67
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”