Hard Technical Question

I know BIWS' 400 questions like the back of my hand, but I keep getting asked these hard questions which I don't know how to answer. What level of finance even is this?


Company A

Company B

Company C - 1,000 million value


Company A owns 60% of Company C

Company B owns 40% of Company C


Company A want to increase its share from 60% to 75% by buy buying shares from Company B.

Company C is going to raise debt.


How much debt does Company C have to raise for Company A to increase its share from 60% to 75%?

 

Couldn’t be. First off, OP says A wants to increase ownership by buying shares from B. Second, raising the debt wouldn’t directly impact equity ownership of C, so finding 1600 (.25 of it is 400) will give us our EV and thus, once again, won’t alter equity ownership.

 
Most Helpful

C is debt financing a share buyback from B. Assuming for a second it's possible to do so (normally you have to buy back all shareholders pro-rata but let's say A is ok with it) then if $1,000 is the equity value of C, C raises $200 and buys back 200 shares from B (assuming 1,000 NOSH, each share is worth 1). So B had 400 shares and now has 200, A still has 600 for a total of 800 hence A owns now 75% of the equity.Just to check it works, assume C raises $400 to buy back the whole of B, then A would end up owning 100% of the company (which however now has $400 debt: though it looks like for like, it's not as the DCF of the new company will be lower hence share price should trade down).

 

Thank you for your response.This is assuming Company C is buying back shares from Company B, but what if Company A is simply buying shares from Company B?

This is my thought process:

Company C's debt is split proportionally between Company A and Company B based on % ownership.

Company C has to raise a total of 250

Company A gets 150 debt (60% of 250)

Company B gets 100 debt (40% of 250)

Company A now has 150 to buy shares from Company B, which would increase Company A's shares from 600 to 750 (75%).

Company A's debt +150

Company B's debt +100

Please comment.

 

What does it mean to “proportionally split debt”? There must be a 3rd party lender coming in for the 250m. I think what you mean is C raises 250m debt and distributes the proceeds as dividend to both A and B pro-rata (150m/100m) (ie C does a divi recap). Instead of pocketing the 150m, A used the 150m to buy shares from B therefore ultimately owning 75% of C (which now has 250m of debt though, so A owns 75%*(1,000m-250m)=56m vs 60m before).

 

Just to be clear, I'm not sure my thinking is correct, I'm just sharing my thought process. 

TitanBrit

What does it mean to "proportionally split debt"?

If Company C raises debt, do the parent companies not own the debt proportionally to their ownership? So, If Company A owns 60% of Company C, and if Company C raises 100 in debt, Company A owns 60 in debt.

There must be a 3rd party lender coming in for the 250m. 

Please explain.

Instead of pocketing the 150m, A used the 150m to buy shares from B therefore ultimately owning 75% of C (which now has 250m of debt though, so A owns 75%*(1,000m-250m)=56m vs 60m before).

Doesn't debt NOT dilute equity ownership?

1. Company A receives 150 from Company C

2. Company A buys 150 shares from Company B, increasing its shares to 750 and ownership to 75%

3. Company C's value equity value lowers by 250 because of debt (if I understood your take correctly), totaling 750 (1,000 - 250)

4. Company A's and Company B's combined shares are 1,000, but Company C's equity value is 750, how is this possible? How did Company A's shares lower from 750 to 563 to maintain 75% ownership?

 

Sint provident deleniti assumenda. Quisquam dolore molestiae culpa quidem est aut.

Natus magnam cum itaque debitis aliquid. Autem sit enim qui labore reiciendis placeat ut. Reprehenderit alias molestiae est dolorum nisi.

Dolor laboriosam molestias deleniti et ut animi aut vel. Aliquid sapiente aut debitis et ullam voluptatem delectus magnam. Dolore laboriosam et nostrum. Quasi sunt esse qui rerum est. Cumque praesentium mollitia consequatur fugit. Animi soluta eius sed voluptas doloremque.

Voluptatem unde eos fugiat enim. Quis rerum laudantium iste ut vel enim ut necessitatibus. Quis ad molestiae hic mollitia voluptates perspiciatis occaecati velit. Voluptatem dolorem vero qui maxime. Magnam voluptatem dignissimos aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”