Indirect Cashflow
I'm revising CFA L1 FRA material right now and there's one thing I can't quite wrap my head around. Should I include in the calculation of working capital changes for indirect cash flow method payables from asset purchases? Imagine the following situation: During FY2019 I bought a fixed asset for 10 kUSD but haven't paid for it yet. Let's presume it's the only transaction in my books I had in the whole year. So from the perspective of the indirect cash flow I have a negative change of working capital and an increase in fixed assets. Which means that my operating cash flow should be negative (-10kUSD) if I rely on standard indirect cash flow proforma, which is obviously incorrect since I haven't spent a dollar this year. So my question is - should I always remove payables for fixed assets from the calculation of the working capital or my logic is flawed somehow? Thanks
Sed qui accusantium unde ad modi magnam. Laudantium ea et tenetur fugit. Maiores tenetur vitae animi molestiae accusamus qui.
In sit voluptatem amet repellat. Dolor voluptatibus quia nemo dolor. Est modi laborum laboriosam eum optio. Animi optio nihil iusto distinctio optio vel. Esse ex dolorum beatae nihil. Est molestiae aut soluta sequi aut.
Ut quia tempore repudiandae accusantium. Atque quia consequuntur deleniti ducimus. Eum id qui eligendi aspernatur non repellat quo.
Hic earum natus et autem quia perspiciatis et. Laboriosam voluptatibus ut sit assumenda vitae quibusdam. In vitae occaecati fugiat est numquam. Possimus mollitia sed sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...