Modeling/Valuation not “important” in CF?!

I’ve been interviewing at a lot of boutique CF houses and initially I thought I had a strong profile after working c. 3 yrs at a Big4 (Business Modeling and Valuation team).

As I have +6 yrs of experience they keep telling me that modeling/valuation work is not as important as understanding the deal cycle/process/project management part of a transaction.

So they tell me that even though I have this experience it is way easier for them to pick someone with 1 yr of CF experience.

But in order to move into IB, CF, PE I know I need to do deals and understand the processes.

Am I applying to the wrong firms? I would expect boutique CF houses to be less competitive than BB IB firms, PE etc.

Any thoughts?

8 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, it seems like you're facing a common challenge in the finance industry. It's true that understanding the deal cycle, process, and project management aspects of a transaction are crucial in Corporate Finance (CF). However, your modeling and valuation skills are also valuable, and it's surprising to hear that they're being downplayed.

It's possible that the boutiques you're interviewing with have a specific focus or approach that doesn't heavily rely on modeling/valuation. Or, they might be emphasizing the importance of deal experience because it's something you lack compared to other candidates.

As for whether you're applying to the wrong firms, it's hard to say without more information. Boutique CF houses can indeed be less competitive than BB IB firms or PE, but they also might be looking for different skill sets or experiences.

Here's a bit of monkey wisdom for you: don't get discouraged. Keep applying and interviewing. Consider broadening your search to include other types of firms, or roles that might value your modeling/valuation skills more. And remember, every interview is a learning experience and a chance to improve. Keep swinging from those branches, and you'll find the right tree eventually!

Sources: BB vs. Boutique? Why always BB, Does IB/PE Kill Your Creativity and Intellectual Curiosity?, Capital Markets vs. Boutique M&A

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Are you talking about small IB firms when you mention boutique CF houses? If so they're kind of right - I started my career at a small regional boutique and even though I had to model, a lot of my work was managing / supporting the deal process, which a lot of times doesn't involve modeling / excel. They're kind of right to a certain extent that there are candidates with more applicable experience, but at the same time the barrier to entry should be lower with these boutiques. My guess is that the tight hiring market makes them less likely to take a risk on someone without direct applicable experience, but I'm just making an assumption. Either way keep trying - going from Big4 valuation / modeling to IB is pretty doable so it might just be a numbers game at this point for you.

 
Most Helpful

Yes, what I mean is probably a boutique IB firm such as "Big4 Corporate Finance team" just smaller.

When I go to interview at these places they look at me saying "You know, what we're doing isn't rocket science so do not expect us do extensive modeling and proper valuations"

I just got an offer from a small LMM IB which I expect to take, however, I don't know if I should have aimed for larger investment banks. However, the competition seems much higher at these firms...

 

Nice congrats on the offer! In the end it depends what you want to do. Experiences will wildly vary, but the modeling experience I did at my LMM gig was more than sufficient for what I wanted to do in CD, corporate finance, etc. It was also enough for getting offers for some LMM / MM PE gigs (to be fair I had to study for these too).

I think name will carry you a bit further if you're able to get into one of the larger investment banks, but to your point they're more competitive. I think a good potential strategy is stay at your LMM for 1-2 years then transfer to a larger bank depending on your career goals. I would just take the offer for what it is and play it safe, but that's just me.

 

Doloremque ducimus maiores nihil qui tempore id. Et voluptatem aut sint. Totam eaque atque consequatur ut rem iste distinctio. Iure voluptates odio placeat error. Sit libero eum voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”