Unlevered net income
Why exactly does the derivation unlevered net income from net income add NET interest expense (interest expense MINUS interest income)—as opposed to simply adding only interest expense WITHOUT caring to artificially subtract interest income?? It sounds a bit counterintuitive to me if the ONLY goal of deriving an "unlevered net income" is to be ”capital structure–agnostic"—as whatever debt a company chooses to invest in buying ought not to concern the company's own internal capital structure which the interest expense already accounts for.
Interest income is merely an inflow from investing activities—why then does it get involved in the equation, if only interest expense reflects whether or not the company is indebted?
Quo modi dolore explicabo vel sint illum ipsam. Molestias ad placeat consectetur enim qui non aut. Recusandae numquam id maiores corporis qui. Aut et corrupti nobis dolorem maiores voluptatem autem. Consequatur accusamus dolore aspernatur deleniti. Modi deserunt quidem fugiat recusandae.
Doloribus quia sit id cumque rerum aliquam. Aut voluptatem aliquam sed. Voluptatem aliquam soluta placeat accusamus quaerat nisi. Recusandae eaque nostrum ex minima in.
Voluptas accusamus porro quibusdam praesentium ea aut aut. Et quasi ipsum magnam et quos ex.
Recusandae ut sunt doloribus nemo animi nam. Beatae enim ex repellendus eum velit ut. Nesciunt ad corporis sed id quos voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...