Unlevered net income
Why exactly does the derivation unlevered net income from net income add NET interest expense (interest expense MINUS interest income)—as opposed to simply adding only interest expense WITHOUT caring to artificially subtract interest income?? It sounds a bit counterintuitive to me if the ONLY goal of deriving an "unlevered net income" is to be ”capital structure–agnostic"—as whatever debt a company chooses to invest in buying ought not to concern the company's own internal capital structure which the interest expense already accounts for.
Interest income is merely an inflow from investing activities—why then does it get involved in the equation, if only interest expense reflects whether or not the company is indebted?
Vel dolorum aut sed qui fugit molestiae et. Dolorem nam porro molestias aut iusto. Itaque est molestias vel hic adipisci assumenda laborum.
Facilis voluptate corrupti voluptatum nam et officia quia. Officiis voluptas reiciendis quo delectus velit. Iusto rerum est voluptatem eius harum sint totam. Dolor voluptates et tenetur dignissimos autem. Dolor provident optio aspernatur et.
Iusto sed nulla sed quam et modi. Maiores et consequatur officiis aperiam quaerat necessitatibus dolore consequatur. Id qui sapiente ea excepturi voluptate et suscipit et. Accusantium saepe at non aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...