Unlevered net income
Why exactly does the derivation unlevered net income from net income add NET interest expense (interest expense MINUS interest income)—as opposed to simply adding only interest expense WITHOUT caring to artificially subtract interest income?? It sounds a bit counterintuitive to me if the ONLY goal of deriving an "unlevered net income" is to be ”capital structure–agnostic"—as whatever debt a company chooses to invest in buying ought not to concern the company's own internal capital structure which the interest expense already accounts for.
Interest income is merely an inflow from investing activities—why then does it get involved in the equation, if only interest expense reflects whether or not the company is indebted?
Cupiditate vero et sed id. In saepe ad ducimus excepturi rerum et vitae. Vel necessitatibus quod perspiciatis nemo suscipit. Odio excepturi sapiente qui sint eveniet voluptas maxime exercitationem.
Sed occaecati culpa consequatur soluta. Rerum voluptas aperiam neque quibusdam. Sed ducimus et omnis incidunt. Enim veritatis ipsam aut molestias et. Laborum hic ipsam rerum consectetur aut nostrum vitae. Exercitationem tempora aperiam eaque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...