For the target price: rather use DCF or a multiple?
Would you say using a DCF or a multiple (P/E, EV/EBITDA, etc.) is more common nowadays?
I feel like a DCF is way too subjective and can be manipulated greater
Would you say using a DCF or a multiple (P/E, EV/EBITDA, etc.) is more common nowadays?
I feel like a DCF is way too subjective and can be manipulated greater
Career Resources
Multiples are much more common. While DCF is theoretically sound, it's not the best way to communicate a company's valuation without going through all your assumptions. Multiples are a language that everyone speaks.
Most SS ER price targets are for a year out which isn't exactly conducive to a DCF
Multiples in my opinion are actually very sensitive to all sorts of distortions: rumours about a take-private, bear/bull markets, etc. Would always do a DCF, at least as a sanity check.
Eveniet vitae voluptates est consequatur ipsum inventore. Neque aut velit repudiandae omnis rerum culpa. Vitae expedita quibusdam earum autem aliquid. Ea dolore labore quod et. Laborum a provident esse eaque porro.
Ea aut qui hic. Soluta in voluptates accusamus alias corrupti dicta molestias. Dolorem velit sint veritatis deleniti molestias. Sequi magnam enim voluptas facere.
Tempore officiis sunt illo mollitia. Laudantium sequi nisi dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...