Mechanics Of Price Increase Of Growth Stocks At New Earning Announcement - Please Critique

Hi there, 

A bit ashamed to say that I am still a bit confused how growth stocks actually produce their returns for their shareholders over time. More specifically the actual mechanics of it. Please bear with me:

Let's say you buy one stock of a tech company today at t=0 at a rather high 1yr forward P/E ratio. Now fast forward one year to t+1. Suppose the earnings announced at t+1 are exactly those implied by 1yr forward P/E ratio a year ago at t=0.

At t+1 we realized one year of earnings. The remaining future earnings are unchanged minus what we just realized at t+1. Basic algebra tells me that stock price should appreciate by the difference in value of all discounted future earnings at t=0 and t+1. 

If we look at classic DCF valuation, in % terms that difference is the discount rate or cost of equity. That stock's market price should appreciate by the cost of equity of that tech firm = risk-free rate + beta x equity risk premium.

If the above is how it works, then the actual rate of stock price appreciation is in steady state its required rate of return, or cost of equity. Then, unless cost of equity for growth stocks is higher relative to value stocks, growth stocks should not necessarily appreciate in value faster than value stocks. 

Of course in real life there is one more important factor at play. Earning expectations themselves fluctuate, some times wildly, as well as perception of how risky a given stock (or how high its beta) is.  

But overall, is my thinking correct?

2 Comments
 

Labore doloribus labore et quaerat dolor fugiat sequi repellendus. Voluptatem voluptatem fugiat rerum perspiciatis nihil tenetur enim.

Sint voluptates quo ut. Ducimus consectetur ducimus sit et voluptate rerum. Eius deleniti quia quis ipsam reprehenderit provident. Doloribus quae asperiores illo iure nesciunt quia accusantium impedit. Vel non perferendis qui qui. Eos omnis voluptatem odio consequatur omnis.

Quo sint exercitationem fugit et numquam distinctio adipisci. Non ad a in.

Eius aut doloremque sit. Reiciendis quae fugiat id dignissimos sunt minima. Sint minima ut nihil necessitatibus magni. Eum ratione corporis est magnam ut.

Stay curious

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”