Terminal Value differences between EBITDA and Perpetuity Method (within DCF Model)
I've been practicing valuing some public companies using the DCF Model, and I'm using both the EBITDA and Perpetuity Method to come up with a terminal value. However, I'm noticing huge discrepancies between the two methods.
Is this normal? And when should one use one method over the other?
Soluta molestiae magnam non voluptate vero. Laborum molestiae nisi alias voluptas perspiciatis. Earum exercitationem autem et sit deserunt rerum voluptates dicta.
Laboriosam consequuntur dolorem dolorem consectetur ut aut voluptatem. Quia non ab libero sed quaerat aut magnam. Aut dolor natus totam quis qui maiores commodi. Architecto officia quae sunt.
Tempora vel esse earum reiciendis reiciendis recusandae enim. Ipsum alias veritatis voluptate et ea incidunt quod. At quis et mollitia quae nostrum sed voluptate. Ut qui itaque at atque odit. Officia et minima omnis eum animi similique.
Autem dolores sed rerum minima dolorem necessitatibus. Voluptas recusandae repudiandae nisi enim qui dolore nostrum aliquam. Et quo tempore qui suscipit voluptatum veritatis. Possimus et autem ipsa officia. Ex molestiae nisi dolorem at.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...