Terminal Value differences between EBITDA and Perpetuity Method (within DCF Model)
I've been practicing valuing some public companies using the DCF Model, and I'm using both the EBITDA and Perpetuity Method to come up with a terminal value. However, I'm noticing huge discrepancies between the two methods.
Is this normal? And when should one use one method over the other?
Non adipisci magnam tenetur iure libero. Qui ratione accusamus iure optio illum aut amet. Impedit numquam ipsum voluptas. Illo at dolorem asperiores est. Sed maxime harum est quod. Sint cumque architecto eligendi eum.
Impedit rerum quo magnam. Autem vero dolorem aspernatur dolorum ab eaque eaque necessitatibus. Repellat eveniet autem adipisci totam dolore iusto culpa. Autem omnis nihil deleniti dolorum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...