Anonymous Posting + Region Filters + WSO Announcements

ANNOUNCEMENT #1: Now in order to post anonymously a member must have at least 4 SBs AND a ratio (SB/SB+MS) over 0.70. This will not prevent some people hiding behind anonymous posting to say something inflammatory, but at the very least there is a bit more of a hurdle to use the feature and someone can lose it easily if they abuse it and get too many MS. This also prevents some of the more opinionated users that like to debate incessantly (and thus have a ratio of under 0.70) to use the anonymous feature to get more aggressive. It won't be perfect but I think this is a good first step...let's see how it goes.

ANNOUNCEMENT #2: We have 3x'd the number of times our mods check the forums throughout the day to continually move stuff out of the IB forums that don't belong there (school ranking threads) and to more aggressively no bump de-emphasize prestige discussion threads to make sure that our ~2-3 AMA / more informative posts don't drown in the noise and that the professional users continue to get value out of WSO.

ANNOUNCEMENT #3: We're trying to get a new filter live today that allows all new threads to be identified by region. So if someone is talking/asking about IB on the west coast, they would select USA - W...if someone is talking about London PE, the UK filter would get selected, etc... We've already identified the 25 regions (many subregions) that make the most sense based on our traffic patterns and are working fast to try and get this live today (with pretty flags by next week). One of the challenging/fun parts is running a script across all 500,000+ discussions to try and tag as many of them with these regional filters as possible based on keywords (my guess is the script will be able to successfully tag ~50,000-80,000 successfully but I'll keep you all posted).

The goal here will be to allow all site visitors to curate regional content more easily to regions they care about. So the UK folk that don't care about US topics can just focus on UK stuff, and vice versa...same with Canada, Singapore, China, Hong Kong, etc...

All of this stuff won't be perfect at first go around so thank you for your patience! Patrick

12 Comments
 

I like the idea behind this. Only concern I have is that those will less popular opinions (whether political, economic, or otherwise) will have their anonymity stripped- could be sort of aggressive and promote a group-think mentality. I do see how it can stop people from trolling though- I guess we will see how this works its way through the forums.

 

People are already anonymous in the most important way: nobody knows their true identities. Allowing additional anonymous posting was well intentioned but ultimately a huge mistake; participants in networks, particularly content-based ones, crave at least some kind of credit / ability to connect on some level with other participants. Anonymity killed that and I think it’s really smart he’s rolling part of that back

 

As someone who only cares about uk centric forums, the location feature is gonna be reallyyy useful. Cheers patrick.

 

Cheers Patrick and WSO, can't wait for this to happen - however, 4 SBs seem a bit low, doesn't it?

"They say money can't buy happiness? Look at the fuckin' smile on my face. Ear to ear, baby!" - Boiler Room
 
Funniest
"WallStreetOasis.com" This also prevents some of the more opinionated users that like to debate incessantly (and thus have a ratio of under 0.70) to use the anonymous feature to get more aggressive.

Hmmm, looks like my ratio is 68.9%. I would just like to announce that I find Donald Trump and Joe Biden to be perfectly equally cromulent. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

"I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people."
 
Most Helpful

ha, I promise not on purpose. I honestly think 0.70 is a fairly easy to hit if you stay clear of political threads (or at least stay respectful within them) and are giving advice as much as you are trying to win an argument (remember, arguing has the downside of bumping threads that are annoying to the vast majority of readers until mods can manually no bump it).

I know there are some more active members on here that don't hit that like LBObuyout above, but I don't think many of them care if their username is hidden or not (if they do then I'm concered about what they are trying to post)...

Based on what I've seen, below a 0.70 USUALLY means ONE or more of the following is true:

1) You enjoy political discourse and will defend your side to the death against anonymous people online rather than try to understand their approach/perspective and share yours respectively :-)

2) You are immature

3) You're a troll

4) When you do disagree, you write hastily without thinking about how your comments will be interpretted

5) You make sexist / racist or other inappropriate comments on the boards

0.70 is arbitrary, but remember this isn't some ban on posting, it's just a feature you don't get to use until you've demonstrated a bit less combativeness.

Anyways, this is all still being evaluated.

Thanks, Patrick

 
"WallStreetOasis.com"

1) You enjoy political discourse and will defend your side to the death against anonymous people online rather than try to understand their approach/perspective and share yours respectively :-)

Haha, unpossible! I also think any viewpoint left of center, mild or not, was getting an unbalanced load of MS, but that seems to have balanced out in recent months. I think this is a good feature to most importantly stop harassment and misinformation, which this rule will do.

"I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people."
 

Perferendis voluptates voluptas aut ipsa similique. In corporis et cumque dolorem ea aut porro. Ut sed repellat dolores omnis molestiae facilis. Voluptates ut et perferendis. Vel amet dolor dolore temporibus.

Ut facere sed autem. Accusamus minima aut quae laudantium neque. Autem dicta fugiat quia ducimus qui.

Ut sequi rerum quas qui asperiores itaque officia. Eligendi rerum sint sapiente aspernatur mollitia voluptates. Officia vero itaque quia voluptate. Dolorem similique soluta ullam.

Tempora voluptatem quasi porro et harum sunt. Et autem quia odit sed asperiores consequuntur eos voluptatum. Asperiores molestiae ducimus sunt eaque. Aut tempora voluptas debitis et ea ea.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”