Confidentiality during interviews

Just had an interview yesterday and I was asked questions concerning an experience at a fund. They asked questions concerning the strategies that are used and what we look for in our strategies. I felt like the question was getting a bit too specific as I was not supposed to disclose any information regarding our activities.

So I just wanted to know how would you answer these questions during an interview? Do you just tell them that you can’t talk about it, do you tell them everything, or do you try to talk about it without getting too specific?

I tried to do the latter but was very dissatisfied with my answer as there was a lot of hesitation (to try not to disclose too much information) and the answer was too vague. Any advice?

 

So do you just tell them something like "Sorry but I can't discuss the strategies that we use at our fund."? I told them something along the lines of "I can't really be too specific, I hope you can understand." but they kept insisting and asked for what kind of elements do we look for, what kind of data do we use, etc.

 

So do you just tell them something like "Sorry but I can't discuss the strategies that we use at our fund."? I told them something along the lines of "I can't really be too specific, I hope you can understand." but they kept insisting and asked for what kind of elements do we look for, what kind of data do we use, etc.

I'm sure you signed an NDA as part of that onboarding? If so, tell them the truth that because of that you're not at liberty to discuss anything that detailed. If they have ethics or a sense of not conjuring their own liabilities they'll back off like Oracle mentioned. If they kept pushing, throw it right back that you're not about to wade into any kind of legal issue.

Like I'm sure OracleofBromaha has done, and I have too, is the most detailed you should ever say is "I've worked with several UHNW partners and even some F100 c-level people. It was always a pleasant relationship. I helped them achieve their results and everyone walked away a winner." That's it, the end.

The poster formerly known as theAudiophile. Just turned up to 11, like the stereo.
 

Oh man, i had an interview recently. I felt like one person in the interview panel kept 'drilling' into each of my answer. eventually i may have spilled beans in the privys of a deal and being inexperienced in the interview process, i sort of regret it and wish I manoeuvred it a bit differently. I felt like it was hard to keep it high-level or a more broad, otherwise you risk just not giving any real detail and they'll keep on drilling you anyway. 

 

Also wondering where do you guys draw the line? How do you determine what you can and cannot speak about?

 
Most Helpful

If you're talking quant, I think there's an art to offering enough information to demonstrate you're a good candidate and know what you're doing, but not enough that they can recreate it themselves without you- otherwise why would they need to hire you. You should be comfortable doing this because it weeds out the exploitative employers who you wouldn't want to work for anyways, and is in your own best interest. I wouldn't outright say you can't discuss something (this is less graceful), maybe just focus on the things you can say. We have a proprietary dataset (do not name it) that generally measures Y from an external vendor. If its well known in industry maybe its ok to name it. We found it has predictability on XYZ asset classes at H horizon. Or something like, most quant strategies in our horizon usually do X, but they tend have Y and Z issues. We really improved performance with some proprietary signal construction/statistical adjustments that improved X characteristic, or by focusing it down to specific scenarios S where it works better. If they insist, you know who you're dealing with and you can politely end the interview.

As a TLDR, I think its ok to give everything except for the 'secret sauce' or 'key insight' that enables someone to make a signal work. What that is exactly depends for each signal.

 

Fuga sit explicabo explicabo laboriosam aliquid. Rerum suscipit et consequatur placeat. Modi nulla iste libero natus aspernatur consequuntur nulla. Facilis eveniet quisquam consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”