3 Comments
 

If you're being directly hired by a PM at a mid-market hedge fund (MMHF), the process can vary significantly depending on the PM and the firm's structure. Based on the most helpful WSO content, direct hires often bypass some of the more standardized HR processes, but this doesn't necessarily mean you'll avoid modeling tests or other evaluations entirely.

Here’s what you should consider:

  1. PM's Discretion: If the PM is directly involved in hiring, they may tailor the process to their preferences. This could mean skipping HR formalities but still requiring a modeling test or case study to assess your technical skills and thought process.

  2. Modeling Tests: Even in direct hire scenarios, modeling tests are often a key part of the evaluation. PMs want to ensure you can handle the technical demands of the role, especially in a performance-driven environment like a hedge fund.

  3. Cultural Fit and Interviews: While HR might not be heavily involved, you could still face interviews with other team members or the PM to evaluate your fit within the team and your ability to think like an investor.

  4. Flexibility in Process: Direct hires might experience a more streamlined or informal process, but the core evaluations (like modeling tests or deal discussions) are unlikely to be skipped entirely, as they are critical for assessing your capabilities.

Ultimately, while the process might be less rigid than standard recruiting, you should still prepare for technical evaluations and discussions about your experience and investment approach.

Sources: Q&A: Big 4 Consulting to Lower MM IB to MM IB (No MBA)., LO to MM HF?, Q&A: Barclays IB to MM Private Equity, A Non-Target's Perspective - My MM PE Recruiting Process, Leaving MFPE for MMHF seat?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Doloribus a sapiente nisi repellendus. Est animi inventore in. Ab vero consequatur est unde exercitationem a. Qui nemo consequatur velit architecto sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”