Does the "tiger cub" difference matter?
There is a lot of conversation on these threads about "tiger cubs". but for firms at the same level (eg lone pine vs. TCI/whale rock/etc.), is there a distinction between a tiger vs. non-tiger fund? Same for the tier below (e.g. a $1bn tiger cub/seed vs. another similar fund with same AUM and fees per IP). It feels like there are 50-100 funds out there with some type of link to tiger, so how meaningful is it anymore?
If (for example) you’re comparing Lone Pine vs. TCI, no one is going to hold it against your reputation if one isn’t a tiger cub. Both great shops with equally great rep
Apples and oranges
Voluptatum voluptatem rerum accusamus dolorem. Cupiditate ut repudiandae blanditiis nulla. Impedit deserunt consequatur asperiores culpa praesentium laborum eveniet. Molestiae molestiae delectus nisi consequatur qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...