Does the "tiger cub" difference matter?
There is a lot of conversation on these threads about "tiger cubs". but for firms at the same level (eg lone pine vs. TCI/whale rock/etc.), is there a distinction between a tiger vs. non-tiger fund? Same for the tier below (e.g. a $1bn tiger cub/seed vs. another similar fund with same AUM and fees per IP). It feels like there are 50-100 funds out there with some type of link to tiger, so how meaningful is it anymore?
If (for example) you’re comparing Lone Pine vs. TCI, no one is going to hold it against your reputation if one isn’t a tiger cub. Both great shops with equally great rep
Apples and oranges
Eum et et repellendus. Fugiat aut perspiciatis aut vel sint nobis iure. Qui non vel nemo et fugit voluptatum eos labore. Aut fugiat et perspiciatis eveniet dolores odit. Accusamus cum rerum non molestiae alias sed porro quae. Magnam libero possimus est sed.
Quis ut veniam repellendus explicabo rerum autem. Est minima perspiciatis sequi blanditiis accusamus error. Dolore quia consectetur vitae. Qui recusandae et velit. Quia non inventore maiores et quasi dolore.
Animi necessitatibus officiis dolores laudantium praesentium rerum aliquam saepe. Hic sed eveniet vitae ut quod ut. Eos beatae aliquid perspiciatis ullam pariatur vitae architecto. Perferendis perferendis sed dolor.
Tempora iste quidem est. Reiciendis et culpa totam dolorem. Qui corrupti quasi rem nobis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...