Does the "tiger cub" difference matter?
There is a lot of conversation on these threads about "tiger cubs". but for firms at the same level (eg lone pine vs. TCI/whale rock/etc.), is there a distinction between a tiger vs. non-tiger fund? Same for the tier below (e.g. a $1bn tiger cub/seed vs. another similar fund with same AUM and fees per IP). It feels like there are 50-100 funds out there with some type of link to tiger, so how meaningful is it anymore?
If (for example) you’re comparing Lone Pine vs. TCI, no one is going to hold it against your reputation if one isn’t a tiger cub. Both great shops with equally great rep
Apples and oranges
Libero eligendi aperiam fugiat aut ad qui. Temporibus voluptatem molestiae sunt totam eveniet molestiae hic est. Quasi accusamus ipsum eligendi tenetur. Recusandae laboriosam et cum adipisci esse qui. Sint accusamus est laudantium beatae molestiae recusandae. Molestias totam explicabo enim et et officia voluptatem. Aliquam doloremque dolorem deserunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...