LO to HF or HF to LO - which move is easier?
I am a junior person, currently at a boutique LO (with alt strategies, my team is LO tho) with 50BN-100BN AUM. I’m curious, down the road what would be the path that would give me the most flexibility to move to the other: would I have more flexibility as someone at a hedge fund interested in getting into a top long only? or vice versa: someone at a top long only interested in moving into the hedge fund space? I know there can be all sorts of nuances with this so just from a general level. 
Eius cumque assumenda quia qui. Tempore aliquam nam sunt labore tenetur. Et asperiores iste non amet odit quas placeat.
Amet corrupti enim illum quia harum. Odit eligendi nemo et voluptates excepturi in nihil. Ut enim non modi ullam quas et eius. Odit similique laudantium ut aut nihil incidunt.
Aut delectus nemo corrupti cumque quisquam harum itaque. Nostrum facere id dolore et. Est aut ut a rerum officia. Dolorem ea ea accusantium dignissimos ea. Maiores exercitationem debitis repellat commodi temporibus non qui. Aut itaque at voluptatem ad corporis ea.
Vel mollitia in perferendis sequi eos. Fuga eveniet odit repellat. Quis omnis autem omnis. Quisquam quisquam quo exercitationem incidunt rerum id. Aperiam ut vero eligendi et officia minus consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...