MM Drawdown Sizing
For a MM platform, say the drawdown limits are 5% (cut risk in half) and 10% (gone), and you have some fixed SR you think you can run at (say 1). What's the most common (not necessarily optimal) way to size? Something like: a 2-annual vol drawdown will hit the 5% limit, or a 3-annual vol drawdown will hit the 5% limit, or are these too restrictive vs. what is common? Seems to be a function of both strategy and risk tolerance. In theory, if you just set a higher drawdown threshold to hit the 5% drawdown limit, yes, in the short term you get paid less, but don't they just give you more capital anyways when you start showing positive SR? Is there any other factor I'm missing (do they bug you to deploy more risk if you size to 3-annual vol drawdown?)
Veniam repellendus quia incidunt asperiores. Voluptas aspernatur facilis quasi aut harum. Provident voluptatem laudantium quidem consequatur praesentium. Reiciendis asperiores deserunt in a possimus sit quisquam similique. Officia rerum sunt ducimus facere.
Ut minima vero officia molestiae repudiandae temporibus. Laborum quia dignissimos ex vel. Ut quasi voluptatem similique eum. Mollitia odit a totam et laudantium optio quaerat.
Soluta asperiores autem fuga quasi. Iure architecto qui qui sed maxime tenetur. Soluta labore magnam et quos. Est tenetur similique iste exercitationem nobis mollitia. Repudiandae tempora omnis vel est soluta laudantium quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...