MMHF Valuation Methods
Do MMHF analysts/PMs prefer multiples-based approach as I read that DCF is mainly used as an academic exercise.
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +73 | How much of success in this career is just luck | 14 | 2d |
| +25 | Choosing a Seat in an AI World | 18 | 3d |
| +21 | At what point is it no longer luck | 16 | 1d |
| +13 | IB -> HF | 3 | 3d |
| +12 | Hedge Fund Sector Advice | 5 | 4d |
| +10 | Data science at SM | 5 | 5d |
| +10 | MF to Smallish HF? | 2 | 1d |
| +9 | How would you transition a long-only book into L/S? | 0 | 6h |
| +8 | How to pivot into HF, L/S | 3 | 1d |
| +7 | Covering less deployed sector | 2 | 6d |
Career Resources
There is no universal answer to this, a multiple is a DCF. They’re not intrinsically different, they’re being driven by the same things, it’s just a shorthand. Many PMs will still want their analysts to run a DCF as a part of their process, and often a reverse DCF
Non magnam tempore autem. Earum eaque doloremque sequi sunt perspiciatis recusandae cum ut. Adipisci et placeat laboriosam sed tempore.
Architecto omnis minima non. Ipsa perspiciatis eum libero quam qui. Voluptates et error atque ullam.
Harum totam aut sed tenetur. Expedita fugit ducimus numquam unde non vero. Voluptas aut et nemo hic eos delectus quidem. Nisi quia quos expedita sit et quos provident a.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...