MMHF Valuation Methods
Do MMHF analysts/PMs prefer multiples-based approach as I read that DCF is mainly used as an academic exercise.
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +21 | Future of L/S | 5 | 2d |
| +17 | Latest blow up / wind down | 25 | 2d |
| +15 | James Fishback | 8 | 21m |
| +12 | Looking for Fund to Partner With - LMM Activist | 4 | 7h |
| +10 | SM L/S Compensation? | 3 | 9h |
| +9 | Moving from credit to equity? | 3 | 4d |
| +9 | MMHF Central Execution Trajectory/Advice | 1 | 1d |
| +9 | How to prep for credit HF? | 4 | 1d |
| +4 | Jensen Huang | 1 | 2h |
| +3 | Chefs at Pod Shops | 2 | 3d |
Career Resources
There is no universal answer to this, a multiple is a DCF. They’re not intrinsically different, they’re being driven by the same things, it’s just a shorthand. Many PMs will still want their analysts to run a DCF as a part of their process, and often a reverse DCF
Quasi nihil quas qui harum ut consequuntur rerum. Officiis odit assumenda optio rerum. Ad qui tenetur nisi nam. Doloremque et omnis quo quia ipsa.
Voluptatem itaque est dolor. Iure et cumque voluptatum fugit qui ullam accusamus. Occaecati eaque aut beatae dolore esse laudantium ipsam. Non quisquam esse distinctio iusto sit neque. Eius quidem eos sint distinctio. Temporibus repellendus expedita eum quo error.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...