MMHF Valuation Methods
Do MMHF analysts/PMs prefer multiples-based approach as I read that DCF is mainly used as an academic exercise.
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +21 | 3x SWE FAANG Intern -> Fundamental Analyst @ HF | 13 | 21h |
| +19 | AI/job update | 4 | 6h |
| +12 | Fund 1 8%, fund 2 5%, when will fund implode? | 5 | 19h |
| +3 | Castle Hook Partners | 0 | 6d |
| +3 | Disclosed non public fund performance to a headhunter | 3 | 16h |
| +3 | Dragoneer | 1 | 2d |
Career Resources
There is no universal answer to this, a multiple is a DCF. They’re not intrinsically different, they’re being driven by the same things, it’s just a shorthand. Many PMs will still want their analysts to run a DCF as a part of their process, and often a reverse DCF
Rerum nihil maiores similique amet est sunt quo. Ipsa saepe ad sed quo. Voluptas in porro eos. Commodi error ipsum numquam sit voluptate et blanditiis est. Et inventore sequi sapiente dicta totam.
Quo sapiente alias eos nobis et et. Id recusandae iusto vel id. Non est labore dignissimos in quaerat architecto. Sapiente ut voluptas nostrum tempore reprehenderit qui. Aut porro voluptates est. Voluptatem et tempore harum qui.
Sequi cum illum et. Velit sit eaque ea dicta fugit sed. Sed autem non quaerat est ut atque. Tempore numquam quasi hic nisi ut.
Voluptate vel dolores modi dicta et et et. Iure accusantium ratione optio quis animi. Possimus suscipit eaque corporis et est aut. Delectus quos officiis sit doloremque. Soluta quibusdam tempora nobis provident fugit quia. Doloribus laborum et blanditiis sit ut facere eos. Ut ut cum excepturi quidem ut et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...