Performance data

Hi all - 

Probably a dumb question. When giving busdev folks a sharpe number on a low net L/S book, do people remove risk free rate (i.e. excess returns) or just use the returns vs. standard deviation? Intuitively it's weird to me to compare a zero net product to a risk free rate.

Also is monthly data the standard?

TY

 

Ah, diving into the nitty-gritty of performance metrics, are we? Not a dumb question at all! It's actually quite insightful and shows you're thinking critically about how to present your fund's performance in the most accurate light. Let's break this down based on the most helpful WSO content and discussions around similar topics.

When it comes to calculating the Sharpe ratio for a low net long/short (L/S) book, the traditional method involves subtracting the risk-free rate from the return of the portfolio to calculate excess returns, and then dividing that by the standard deviation of the portfolio returns. The reason for subtracting the risk-free rate is to assess how much additional return the investment is generating over a "risk-free" asset, adjusted for the risk (volatility) taken to achieve those returns.

However, your intuition raises an interesting point, especially in the context of a zero net product. Comparing a zero net product to a risk-free rate might indeed seem odd because the investment strategy and risk profile are fundamentally different from traditional investments. In such cases, some practitioners might choose to focus on the raw returns versus standard deviation, especially if the strategy's goal is not to outperform the risk-free rate but to achieve absolute returns with minimal correlation to broader market movements.

As for the data frequency, monthly data is indeed standard for calculating the Sharpe ratio and other performance metrics in many cases. Monthly returns provide a good balance between capturing the volatility of the investment and smoothing out short-term anomalies that might skew the data if, say, daily returns were used. However, the choice of frequency can depend on the specific characteristics of the investment strategy and the preferences of the stakeholders reviewing the performance data.

Remember, the key is to ensure that the metrics you use accurately reflect the risk and return characteristics of your strategy and are meaningful to your audience, whether that's internal stakeholders or potential investors. Transparency about the methodology and the rationale behind your choices can also go a long way in building trust and credibility.

So, in summary, while the traditional Sharpe ratio calculation subtracts the risk-free rate, there's room for discretion based on the specific context of your investment strategy. And yes, monthly data is generally the standard but always consider what makes the most sense for your particular situation.

Sources: What is the secret sauce? Feel like I don't know anything, delete delete delete delete, Is the common view of financial risk completely wrong?, The School Bell Rings! It's Time for Class!, Math behind pricing a CMBS loan

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Sunt rem quasi deleniti ducimus. Eum sed iusto dolore quam dolorem quam. Corrupti nisi sequi voluptate. Nisi neque quia voluptate aut rerum beatae. Qui atque maxime explicabo distinctio quia autem ea. Ducimus vitae reprehenderit accusamus corporis quia.

Voluptatum debitis minus dicta aut earum qui voluptas temporibus. Quaerat magnam tempora magnam nam labore. Et corrupti pariatur autem. Recusandae at sit sunt. Quis qui odio dolor non provident. Quis ratione qui dolor non culpa.

Consectetur iste placeat qui suscipit nihil magnam assumenda. Dolores officiis nesciunt quis libero saepe. Provident sint molestiae non rerum. Illo cupiditate molestiae asperiores dolorem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”