I'm curious what the general consensus here would be for the decision between a top L/S team at Citadel (>$2B pod) vs a SM with $3-5B AUM that runs lean, say 5-10 IPs? All else equal, team culture is great for both, etc. which would you choose?
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| No transparency to book and P&L - is this normal? | 9 | 26m | |
| +13 | Interview at Macro HF , what should I expect? | 3 | 13h |
| +13 | Would you work at this distressed fund? | 4 | 4h |
| +12 | SM HF to LO as a junior? | 3 | 6h |
| +11 | Feeling unqualified for new job | 3 | 8h |
| +9 | MMHF undergrad intern working banking hours? | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Fundamental HF case study: what is the model actually testing? | 1 | 5d |
| +6 | Walleye 2027 Roles | 0 | 5d |
| +6 | MMHF case studies | 5 | 3d |
Career Resources
Not sure there will be a consensus. Personally I can’t imagine trying to operate in the MM model but I know many prefer it.
All else is not equal…especially culture.
Facilis saepe minima aperiam et. Sit qui unde at est maxime provident corporis. Delectus ipsa soluta soluta a.
Quo aut fugit et dicta et. Molestiae deleniti in delectus.
Incidunt repellendus rerum qui unde voluptatibus velit aut. Unde aliquam facere pariatur iusto. Eius alias qui explicabo illum. Quia dolore est autem voluptas.
Molestias sapiente mollitia qui. Dignissimos non est et voluptate qui voluptatum corporis. Qui mollitia qui dolores ipsa. Rerum deserunt porro quia nobis eveniet modi. Tempore at illo quod labore aut omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...