I read that his theory was first detailed in a 1970’s memo that explained how his firm was thinking about REIT investments.
Long shot, but anyone ever seen this memo floating around? Would love to get my hands on it.
| +21 | 3x SWE FAANG Intern -> Fundamental Analyst @ HF | 13 | 12h |
| +12 | Fund 1 8%, fund 2 5%, when will fund implode? | 5 | 10h |
| +6 | AI/job update | 1 | 39m |
| +3 | Castle Hook Partners | 0 | 6d |
| +3 | Disclosed non public fund performance to a headhunter | 3 | 7h |
| +3 | Dragoneer | 1 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Why not just read the relevant part of alchemy? It’s a fine book idk why ppl hate
This. By the way, it's far from rocket science.. don't think you're going to learn much extra from reading 20 pages on it vs just 2.
I’m in the RE space. Frankly just really curious how he used it in a REIT context.
I can infer from my own experiences, but 1970’s REIT era is vintage and nothing like reading it straight from the man.
Pretty sure there's a chapter on REITs in Alchemy
Ah, didn’t know that. Much appreciated
Rerum quidem ab labore. Odit voluptas sed quo a assumenda vel. Autem reprehenderit sed molestiae dolorem vitae neque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Perspiciatis ut quo expedita. Et odit commodi voluptas excepturi eum eaque animi. Aut voluptatum tenetur natus quos. Adipisci cumque quam magnam aliquid quas nam. Optio est sed repellendus perspiciatis fugiat.