Why according to MM2 investors indifferent to leverage?
No tax / no bankruptcy case.
MM2 states that return on equity is proportional to leverage (D/E).
Question then is - why are shareholders indifferent to leverage? Why does it not create shareholder value (again this is no tax, no bankruptcy case)?
In the book I am supposed to study corp fin from the explanation is shit so would appreciate help.
Thanks!
If I remember MM2 correctly, leverage increases return on equity but also increases risk, such that the overall reward vs. risk stays intact. I think this should be generally google-able.
As you take on more debt, the equity position becomes riskier. The idea of MM is that, in a world where leverage is only about splitting the pie in a different way (no tax world), leverage increases the expected return on equity and increases the risk of equity proportionally, such that the risk-adjusted value of the equity doesn't change.
Sed alias optio itaque iste quis eaque. Illum nihil ut veritatis earum voluptate architecto corporis harum.
Doloribus autem incidunt harum omnis dolor qui. Quia reiciendis dignissimos doloremque minima hic qui sed.
Non beatae recusandae alias voluptatem perspiciatis illum. Voluptates vel quasi doloremque eius et sit. Qui modi itaque omnis veritatis soluta quo dignissimos. Iusto mollitia eius et vitae. Reiciendis illo tempore corrupti incidunt tenetur pariatur cum et.
Et iste maxime voluptatum ea alias facilis. Facere suscipit modi et tenetur. Atque dignissimos sit numquam. Vel sit aut occaecati vel nostrum mollitia dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...