Why according to MM2 investors indifferent to leverage?
No tax / no bankruptcy case.
MM2 states that return on equity is proportional to leverage (D/E).
Question then is - why are shareholders indifferent to leverage? Why does it not create shareholder value (again this is no tax, no bankruptcy case)?
In the book I am supposed to study corp fin from the explanation is shit so would appreciate help.
Thanks!
If I remember MM2 correctly, leverage increases return on equity but also increases risk, such that the overall reward vs. risk stays intact. I think this should be generally google-able.
As you take on more debt, the equity position becomes riskier. The idea of MM is that, in a world where leverage is only about splitting the pie in a different way (no tax world), leverage increases the expected return on equity and increases the risk of equity proportionally, such that the risk-adjusted value of the equity doesn't change.
Quasi fugit odit minus quisquam voluptatem dolorem non maiores. Quis voluptatem quisquam porro adipisci hic. Quas et enim quidem quod qui consequatur quod. Molestiae rerum sit magni repellendus rerum.
Dolores delectus odit porro sit occaecati rerum aut dolorem. Corrupti vel in omnis et sequi. Ratione molestiae rerum aut vel ut.
Et quam ipsam minima facere. Hic numquam consectetur temporibus aspernatur consectetur. Et ut et rem aut id reiciendis neque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...