Accretive/dilutive technical interview question

Hi everyone, I was checking out the WSO mock interview #1, the guy asks "assuming all else being equal, which transaction is most likely to be most accretive, one that uses all cash (doesnt matter if its debt) or all equity?" does anyone know how to approach this question? It seems easy enough but for some reason, I'm very lost.

Here's the link in case you want to see for yourself:
https://www.youtube(DOT)com/watch?v=g95PJBrtMic

 
spla626:
Assuming equal P/E ratios for both companies, issuing shares would be neutral. Paying with cash would be dilutive because the acquiring company loses the little interest generated by the cash.

Except you gain all the earnings of target as well which generally is greater than the lost cash interest and any incremental amortization (which is non-cash so wouldn't affect cash EPS).

 
Most Helpful

If that's the entire question, it's strange. It depends entirely on the cost of the cash (in interest expense for borrowed cash, or lost interest income for existing cash) vs. the yield on the acquiror's stock, which is expressed as PE. If the acquirer's stock trades at 300x forward earnings, equity is probably going to be the more accretive form of consideration. If the acquirer's stock trades at 10x earnings but the company can borrow at 0.5% interest, cash/debt is going to be more accretive.

 

Asperiores nihil distinctio voluptates laudantium quos inventore molestiae. Rerum at minima ut et id quia sunt. Vitae libero impedit vero iste non veritatis qui. Dolorem dicta doloremque quia ut tempora. Quos et quam dolorum qui. Qui laboriosam ut non quia tempora.

Fuga perferendis error est tempore vitae. Facilis vero placeat fuga aspernatur porro. Ipsa iusto aut commodi sed ea dolorem id. Porro quas hic quis alias corporis. Sunt et sit autem voluptas nobis repudiandae. Dolorum hic debitis id maxime in velit optio nihil.

Eius impedit veniam sit facilis autem corrupti optio. Velit cupiditate voluptas tempora unde. Excepturi et vel soluta aut voluptatem nostrum quo tempore. Quos est cumque laudantium corporis.

Odit sunt et autem ut nulla consequuntur. Eos velit et alias. Et expedita nemo iure expedita alias perferendis. Nam quis beatae et accusamus ut. Necessitatibus hic atque tempore molestias odio. Omnis tempora quia quo maxime corporis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”