Best LevFin Groups
What is the best LevFin group on a the street for work flown and specifically exit ops. I hear DB is very strong but is that actually true?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +165 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 70 | 6h |
| +132 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 1d |
| +90 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 17 | 1h |
| +68 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 12 | 20h |
| +58 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 21 | 1h |
| +51 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 41 | 1h |
| +37 | Investment Banking is Hard | 16 | 3h |
| +33 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 2d |
| +28 | PWP vs BofA | 21 | 14h |
| +21 | Excel macros for QOL formatting | 0 | 6d |
Career Resources
Of all the groups at DB, Lev Fin is one of their strongest. JP Morgan also has a really solid Lev Fin group.
What are other strong groups at Db? If so, what’s like the best?
I hope restructuring
their layoff team is pretty strong
BAML & CS are strong
DB's Lev Fin group has a strong reputation (though the broader bank has been dealing with some issues), as others have mentioned JPM, BAML and CS also. GS has been investing heavily in its Lev Fin franchise over the past couple of years, so while it may not have the recognition in that space that the other names listed above do it's ramping up quickly.
Lev Fin, REGLL, Industrials have historically been the most sought after groups at DB for incoming analysts (along with the Sponsors group for those not interested in coverage roles) and are viewed as the stronger groups at that bank.
between Lev Fin and Sponsors at DB, which one is more modeling intensive and has more deal flows?
Deal flow is probably better in Lev Fin due to DB being more of a debt house + the Lev Fin team seeing both corporate and sponsor-owned transactions.
Both groups do plenty of modeling, as Lev Fin is involved with corporate transactions that the Sponsors team won't be a part of, so the answer is nuanced: when working on a sponsor-backed transaction I think the edge goes toward the Sponsors team due to the general division of responsibilities. Often coverage will help with business-specific and industry knowledge, Lev Fin will focus on the terms, structuring, etc. which often leaves Sponsors with the modeling. This is not always the case on sponsor-backed deals (especially when running a common process where there is no sponsor team engaged yet) and you will certainly get plenty of modeling experience in Lev Fin.
Quia inventore qui id et voluptatibus. Nihil ea dolorem natus et sapiente eaque quo. Consequatur explicabo qui harum sed est ipsum. Sunt officiis odio repellendus in quia esse. Corrupti ipsum optio nihil corrupti corrupti enim quia. Provident placeat totam sed laborum quos et excepturi sunt. Voluptas ut vero dolor.
Id dolores corrupti mollitia tempore. Consequatur nemo ut illo expedita quod. Numquam voluptate totam voluptatem quae quia qui. Quia et distinctio voluptatem minima minima est.
Corrupti qui voluptas iste veritatis quia provident. At culpa saepe minima et reiciendis sequi atque culpa. Voluptate eum autem voluptas ad atque nam occaecati. Nam eius repellendus adipisci labore recusandae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...