4 Comments
 

MAC_DADDY I could agree with you but then we both would be wrong

Write up When you acquire a company you let the accountant value all assest and liabilities at market value first (asset write up). You then subtract liabilities from assets to get to net asset value (NAV). Enterprise value (so not equity value) minus NAV = goodwill.

New identified intangible assets However in this case there seem to be intangible assets that can be recognised (client relationships, brands, IP). They are 10% of the difference between net asset value of existing assets and EV.

Goodwill of previous transactions is completely irrelevant. If the target had acquired other firms in the past that resulted into goodwill, that goodwill is taken out of the books and the process starts with the steps as explained above to get to a new comprehensive amount of goodwill.

 
Most Helpful

Rover-S I used to be the Big 4 accountant doing the PPA's, so I'm well aware that they value the assets... As you noted, the accountant's don't complete the PPA until after the transaction is complete. As such, from from a modeling perspective you need to make assumptions about the excess purchase price (hence the OP's comment about 10% mark-up).

Since there seems to be some disagreement, let's refer to Macabacus...

http://macabacus.com/accounting/purchase-price-allocation2

Per their advanced PPA, you take the EQUITY purchase price less BVNA (i.e., book value of equity) and then ADD BACK (i.e., write off) the existing goodwill to arrive at the excess purchase price...

You then can take the excess purchase price and allocate the write-up (write-down) of fixed assets, finite-lived intangibles/indefinite intangibles (customer relationships, TN's/TM's, IPR&D, developed/patented technology, non-competes, etc.).

Next, assuming a stock transaction, you sum the intangibles/write-up and mulitiply at assumed tax rate to get your assumed DTL. Finally, add the DTL to the excess purchase price to arrive at new goodwill.

 

Et quo omnis enim magnam. Eos sed ut velit voluptas vel. Error ut et nam. Neque et sunt culpa sed velit.

Rerum enim ipsum quo sequi quia. Quaerat nesciunt officiis quos earum enim. Voluptas eligendi nobis fuga rerum hic rem.

Beatae et sed qui eos sapiente est. Earum ut incidunt aperiam ea. Consequatur consequatur et ullam ipsum ducimus excepturi.

Nemo earum voluptas et. Molestiae saepe molestiae quibusdam laborum hic. Quis vitae ut ad magnam molestiae rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”