This has been in my head for a long time, but this is one of those questions that I've been reluctant to ask in real life.
Specifically to IBD, is there really a big difference (if at all) in the quality of work between two BBs (e.g. GS vs DB) - from a client's standpoint? If so, how is it different? If not, then is it a purely reputational thing?
| +161 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 23 | 1d |
| +148 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 20 | 53m |
| +134 | Is pay at BofA really that bad? | 64 | 18h |
| +90 | Day at Macquarie | 12 | 2d |
| +84 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 20 | 3h |
| +50 | How bad did I mess up | 10 | 2d |
| +31 | Misrepresented Houston IB | 14 | 2d |
| +31 | EB (EVR/CVP/LAZ) vs MBB (Bain/BCG) | 12 | 2h |
| +29 | No BB RO 2026 | 10 | 3d |
| +29 | JPM SMALL CAP or WF/JEF/RBC Coverage group | 13 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Ratione cupiditate voluptates tenetur iusto ullam. Magni consequatur molestias natus esse. Voluptatem occaecati et ad tenetur. Quae saepe nemo reiciendis quo est nihil nihil mollitia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...