Disney buys Lucasfilm- $4B ?!?

Is this worth $4B?

What exactly are they purchasing here? Rights for licensing/royalties/distribution/future starwars related sales? Etc

Bets for which banks are on this?? Lol to be released soon...

Article:

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/…

34 Comments
 
BanditPanditstar wars 7, 8, 9??? i think that's the bigger question here.

what the fuck? seriously?

ruining my childhood memories. not cool
 
kidflash
BanditPanditstar wars 7, 8, 9??? i think that's the bigger question here.

what the fuck? seriously?

ruining my childhood memories. not cool

4,5,6 was on a scattershot budget. 1,2,3 was pumped with CGI steroids. it was over when they decided to extend it.

also, jar jar binks was bad enough. care to sit around for Disney's Jar Jar Adventures? you can kill me then.

 

Disney bought marvel a few years back

The Avengers movie alone has grossed over $1B in ticket sales. Thats nuckings futs.

I guess this could be worth it.

 
Accrual DictatorDoesn't Lucasfilm also own the Indiana Jones franchise? If so, I'm feeling a reboot on that coming sometime too.

Yes, this is true, but it mentioned in one of the articles I read Paramount Pictures own the rights to distribution, so this will not be happening. In addition the one that came out a few years ago was terrible..

 

If they reboot both Star Wars, they would pay that much in license fees/revenue sharing for moderate success, and now they have rights for amusement parks/excursions which contribute more to the bottom line anyway. Not sure about Indy, but even if Paramount has distribution they can produce, most studios are moving toward "club deals" on riskier big budget movies anyway.

 
ricottacheeseGS TMT is advising Disney, along with another firm that i dont remember (maybe MS? actually think it mightve been a boutique). do not know about Lucasfilm

i've tried searching the internet a few times for which banks are adivising. how did you hear about GS? can you post a link here?

 
GoodBreadThere's no way they'll reboot Star Wars or Indiana Jones. Maybe but if any franchises are sacred in Hollywood, it's those (notwithstanding what George Lucas/Steven Spielberg feel like doing with them).

Star Wars, probably not. It already makes all the money in the world, regardless of whether us die-hard monkeys enjoy it. Indiana Jones is actually a great candidate for a reboot - high risk, high reward, same as with all the other movies they've done reboots of. The last one sucked, and everyone knows it.

in it 2 win it
 
GoodBreadThere's no way they'll reboot Star Wars or Indiana Jones. Maybe but if any franchises are sacred in Hollywood, it's those (notwithstanding what George Lucas/Steven Spielberg feel like doing with them).

You should research this subject as it was initially Lucas' intention to make Star Wars a nine part movie. Before Disney purchased the group, Lucas already had plans to start the next movie sometime in 2015 and I believe it is Disney's intention to keep that going. Also, I believe it was Lucas' original intention to have the last three films catch up with the main characters in their 60s/70s (which, coincidentally, is the real life ages of those actors now).

We probably won't see any more Indiana Jones.

You're born, you take shit. You get out in the world, you take more shit. You climb a little higher, you take less shit. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what shit even looks like. Welcome to the layer cake, son.
 
Nefarious-
GoodBreadThere's no way they'll reboot Star Wars or Indiana Jones. Maybe but if any franchises are sacred in Hollywood, it's those (notwithstanding what George Lucas/Steven Spielberg feel like doing with them).

You should research this subject as it was initially Lucas' intention to make Star Wars a nine part movie. Before Disney purchased the group, Lucas already had plans to start the next movie sometime in 2015 and I believe it is Disney's intention to keep that going. Also, I believe it was Lucas' original intention to have the last three films catch up with the main characters in their 60s/70s (which, coincidentally, is the real life ages of those actors now).

We probably won't see any more Indiana Jones.

We're on the same page as far as Star Wars, by reboot I mean redoing IV-VI or something to that effect.
 
Best Response

Goldman and Guggenheim:

"Disney got fairness opinions from Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Guggenheim Partners LLC. Goldman's Andrew Gordon worked on the deal. He and Guy Nachtomi advised Disney on its 2009 purchase of Marvel Entertainment Inc. Goldman's history with Disney also includes the Pixar acquisition ; Disney's investment in Indian film, television and gaming company UTV Software Communications Ltd.; its divestiture of ABC Radio to Citadel Broadcasting Corp. and on Comcast Corp.'s ill-fated hostile takeover attempt in 2004. Guggenheim's Alan Schwartz worked on the Lucasfilm deal. As a banker at Bear Stearns Cos. Inc., he advised Disney on the Pixar acquisition. He also advised Disney on the Marvel deal after moving to Guggenheim.

Read more: Disney adds Lucasfilm to its movie empire - The Deal Pipeline (SAMPLE CONTENT: NEED AN ID?) http://www.thedeal.com/magazine/ID/050232/disney-adds-lucasfilm-to-its-…"

 

Actually, they are planning to make movies 7-12. 7 is set for 2015, and Lucas is going to serve as "creative consultant" for the new movies. According to Dale Pollock, who wrote the Lucas' biography, the stories Lucas had in store for 7-9 were the best in the series (and 1-3 were the worst, surprisingly...). These were actually made into books (who read them?). But it is not certain if these stories will be used for the movies yet. It doesn't really matter because look at what Disney did for Marvel -- every Disney era Marvel film that has come out has been great and has made a lot of money.

LucasArts only owns a portion of Indiana Jones and Paramount owns the other portions. This complicates the issue.

They do own a great deal of video games also - Monkey Island (GREAT), Fandango (Great), Knights of the Old Republic (GREAT), etc. That may drive some value for Disney there.

Seems like this is a good transaction for Disney as far as common sense goes.

 

Star Wars was always a nine-part serial, but Lucas couldn't get the money together to do all nine, and the first three alone took several years to finance and shoot. VII, VIII, and IX have always been on paper and are now in early stages of production, according to the release by Disney.

Lucas is either senile, or very greedy, judging by his dogged pursuit of completing these films at the risk of further destruction to his already tarnished legacy. While I respect the tenets of capitalism and the right of someone to make a buck, George wasn't exactly hurting at a $3.25 billion net worth prior to this transaction. Disney will run this franchise into the ground with more and more dilutive children's fare, a la episodes I, II, and III. If you thought Jar Jar was bad (and that was under Lucas's guidance) wait until you see what the House of Mouse has in store for this franchise. Incidentally, George has been through a few nasty divorces and has also put Skywalker Ranch on the block.

What made the originals so amazing was the fact that Lucas was literally creating effects from scratch to tell the story (which became the genesis of Industrial Light and Magic and Skywalker Sound), in service to the story. CGI will never recreate the brilliance of the original hand models and puppets, courtesy of Jim Henson.

 
PlatoStar Wars was always a nine-part serial, but Lucas couldn't get the money together to do all nine, and the first three alone took several years to finance and shoot. VII, VIII, and IX have always been on paper and are now in early stages of production, according to the release by Disney.

Lucas is either senile, or very greedy, judging by his dogged pursuit of completing these films at the risk of further destruction to his already tarnished legacy. While I respect the tenets of capitalism and the right of someone to make a buck, George wasn't exactly hurting at a $3.25 billion net worth prior to this transaction. Disney will run this franchise into the ground with more and more dilutive children's fare, a la episodes I, II, and III. If you thought Jar Jar was bad (and that was under Lucas's guidance) wait until you see what the House of Mouse has in store for this franchise. Incidentally, George has been through a few nasty divorces and has also put Skywalker Ranch on the block.

What made the originals so amazing was the fact that Lucas was literally creating effects from scratch to tell the story (which became the genesis of Industrial Light and Magic and Skywalker Sound), in service to the story. CGI will never recreate the brilliance of the original hand models and puppets, courtesy of Jim Henson.

John Carter was bad, I will admit that, but what about Avengers? You're telling me if they get an all-star cast for 7-12, they will be bad movies that "dilute" the series? I doubt it. Disney can be good when it wants to be, and it will just serve as a financier of the upcoming movies. It will also push George Lucas out of the picture, which in and of itself will save the series.

 

It looks like they are planning on turning Star Wars into a Pirates of the Caribbean. It sort of pisses me off, but who am I kidding. I'm going to watch it anyways.

Because when you're in a room full of smart people, smart suddenly doesn't matter—interesting is what matters.
 

Disney also owned the rights to Toy Story after they bought out Pixar and look at how Toy Story 3 turned out. Plus we all know that for the next Star Wars movie, names like: JJ Abrams and Joss Whedon will be thrown about.

However I want to know what they will do with Grim Fandango and Monkey Island. Plus, how they will incorporate their new franchises as rides in at Disney Land/World. They already have a pretty hefty number of Lucas properties (with a stunt show that is Indiana Jones related) and lots of Star Wars stuff.

 

Reprehenderit assumenda amet velit repellat quo at iure. Autem quo quibusdam totam aut numquam aut. Est fuga quia fugiat sequi. Sit iusto voluptas dolores laboriosam omnis sint.

Fugiat repellat consectetur aut alias pariatur reiciendis. Sunt perspiciatis esse qui dolores.

Rem temporibus consectetur sit perspiciatis necessitatibus dolorum consequatur eveniet. Blanditiis ducimus impedit nemo modi dolorum. Exercitationem debitis deleniti impedit voluptatum qui aliquid.

Rerum qui architecto nulla eum rem. Est voluptatem optio unde sed fugiat perferendis pariatur. Est impedit ut perferendis eum deserunt quia autem.

 

Hic qui quaerat minus maiores non. Sed eos assumenda ipsum consequatur porro odit quis dolor. Vel a maiores aut quia corrupti. Quaerat dolores maiores nulla dignissimos blanditiis voluptatibus facilis. Id omnis alias qui ratione fugit aliquam. Harum aperiam vel dicta laudantium.

Molestiae et laudantium est exercitationem et. Aut deleniti voluptas tempore dolorem labore consequatur quasi. Voluptatum expedita consectetur numquam. Non nobis magnam nihil omnis aliquid qui architecto.

Est quis et maxime eveniet. Quisquam autem earum laborum quas sed sit. Qui dolorem omnis et et facere quis. Architecto tempora dolores ipsam doloremque consequatur. Facilis nulla est rerum inventore.

Expedita veniam soluta temporibus neque ipsa. Voluptas perferendis rem dolorum non. Alias ratione itaque rem voluptate et in assumenda.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”