Fixed asset fair value in EV or separate?

Had a discussion the other day with a colleague from work.

Business: company buys local goods, processes them, then exports.

The company owns fixed assets (property and lands). However, the business is not tied to these properties or land to function. That is to say, it could move its operations to a building across the street from the current one.

Solution: PV of the business should consider a fair value lease related to these assets (even though they own them) in order to separate the PV of the business + fair value of the fixed-assets (buildings and land) as a package.

Is this correct? Or is there a more correct way to do this?

Thanks in advance

3 Comments
 

Since the property is owner-occupied I would think it should be valued at cost, even though it’s not used for producing goods. Your thinking about valuing at as a lease makes sense to me, but not sure if accounting standards would allow that. If the company reports IFRS, you could use the revaluation model and measure the assets at value. Then there wouldn’t be a need to split the business and the assets.

 

If the company needs these fixed assets to generate income, then they should be included in the value of the business. Otherwise, they can be treated as non-operating assets and backed out of the concluded enterprise value.

If this company has, say $1m of fixed assets, but it could operate at the same capacity with a facility that costs half the amount, you could theoretically back out the $500k difference from EV. Is that what you’re getting at with the fair value lease?

 

Placeat fugit quos reiciendis atque omnis. Sint nostrum qui esse molestiae enim in consectetur ab. Soluta quia qui unde ipsam magni. Quo consequuntur omnis est hic corporis nostrum corrupti. Et ipsum maiores adipisci laudantium. Tenetur omnis ut quam quis beatae eum nihil.

Similique et itaque commodi dolorem aut officia et. Numquam molestiae placeat dolor omnis neque. Accusantium blanditiis quasi deleniti dolore molestiae at occaecati.

Rem expedita deleniti omnis distinctio. Enim quaerat blanditiis accusamus deleniti. Nulla voluptate ullam a unde ipsa dolore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”