Good reviews in one group but not in another?

I recently began my 2nd analyst year after internally moving from my original group to c&r in the same firm but in a different office. In my first year I was in the upper middle bucket, but now in my new group one of my supervisors seems to try to make it sound like I am struggling on performance which I do not agree with. The other associates and vps in my new group have given me good feedback, but one manager in particular seems to be giving oddly negative reviews and I am not sure why. But I do sometimes wonder if I could I actually be underperforming in my new position despite having been rated highly in my previous one?
 

I am getting comments about analyses and models being supposedly built wrong, when my vp had already signed off on them the day before. I am also told certain slides are being sent in too slow on pitches where I know the MD doesn’t want a draft until several days from today etc. It is as if nothing is good enough for this particular supervisor I am working with, and I am unsure how to approach this, does anyone have advice? 

 

I’ve experienced this when I was a first year. Worked well with and got along with everyone of my supervisors except for 1 vp in my group. Over time I realized that others had all despised working for him for a multitude of reasons, including receiving useless comments and feedback, anger management issues, and other borderline psychotic behavioral flaws (apparently tried to throw a chair at someone in the office, because that really helps you get places). 

Even though he departed our group months before we got our reviews, we all ended up getting middle to bottom bucket rankings lol. Not sure what your supervisor is like but consider that it’s possible he’s just a pr*ck. If he’s actually a normal and decent guy, then you should probably try to improve in some areas regardless of what they may be, you’re only 1 year in so probably not a rockstar at the job just yet  

 

Oh, I see you're in a bit of a pickle there, aren't you? It's not uncommon to face such situations when you switch teams or roles. Here's what I suggest:

  1. Seek constant feedback: Don't wait for your annual review to know how you're doing. Regularly ask your supervisor and colleagues for feedback. This way, you'll always know where you stand and can make improvements accordingly.

  2. Be open to criticism: It's possible that your new supervisor has a different working style or expectations. Try to understand their perspective and see if there's anything you can learn from it. Remember, it's not personal, it's professional.

  3. Communicate: If you feel there's a misunderstanding or if you're unsure about something, don't hesitate to discuss it with your supervisor. For instance, if you're told that your analyses and models are wrong, ask for specific examples and clarification. This will not only help you improve but also show your willingness to learn and adapt.

  4. Stay positive: It's easy to get disheartened in such situations, but remember, this is a marathon, not a sprint. Keep a positive attitude, learn from your mistakes, and don't let this affect your overall performance.

  5. Consider a lateral move: If things don't improve and you feel this group isn't the right fit for you, you might want to consider moving to a different team or role within the bank. Sometimes, starting fresh can be easier than trying to change someone's perception of you.

Remember, everyone makes mistakes and has room for improvement. What matters is how you handle these situations and learn from them. Keep your chin up, you've got this!

Sources: Annual Review was bad how do I bounce back?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/then-and-now-compbanker?customgpt=1, My A1s are SO BAD

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Necessitatibus eos in est amet cum repudiandae. Magni id incidunt ullam doloribus est neque. Quod sint quibusdam sed alias ullam. Recusandae cumque est suscipit quo illum corrupti adipisci.

Voluptas dicta quas occaecati minus. Doloribus ut at distinctio in hic vel aut.

Fugiat laboriosam qui iure veritatis voluptatem assumenda. Tempore vero veniam numquam quae magni hic autem. Consectetur autem nesciunt consequatur qui ut. Quia minima cumque aperiam dicta.

Est aut et totam illum. Aut nisi et autem tempore ipsam eius. Ipsum rem omnis nesciunt qui. Voluptatem a libero qui omnis et vel sunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”