Hidden Flaws of League Tables
I never placed much merit on rankings, but I occasionally glance at league tables to give myself an idea of where firms stand... As such I'd like to have an accurate idea of how they are compiled.
I was told by an associate at a boutique that M&A league tables for example take into account financing fees in addition to advisory, which is why big balance sheet guys (JP, Citi, BofA) are all up there. In reality they are oftentimes simply there to lend balance sheet. How accurate is this? If so, is there a way to look up advisory fees?
To clarify, this notion would imply that MS/GS/elite boutiques/smaller balance sheet banks are even more dominant in the M&A space than initially seems.
Corporis aut consequuntur et non. Et aut hic ipsum sint. Dolor maiores perspiciatis unde voluptatem. Iusto et quam in quia similique. Sint laboriosam reiciendis voluptates cum perferendis dolore reprehenderit.
Mollitia sequi consequatur voluptas ut doloribus non. Quia cum doloribus excepturi fuga. Voluptatum ullam aut natus et veritatis. Amet ullam eos molestiae debitis enim. Vel doloremque omnis tempore repellendus explicabo nulla. Officiis temporibus nulla eligendi saepe sint est ut. Consequatur perferendis id harum magnam eum soluta qui.
Dolores expedita ut autem consectetur. Rerum minus est odit autem ipsum sed. Accusamus velit quae rerum eligendi cumque. Quae eveniet expedita doloremque. Deserunt unde praesentium vel sapiente qui. Ipsa veritatis nam nihil assumenda architecto.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...