Hidden Flaws of League Tables
I never placed much merit on rankings, but I occasionally glance at league tables to give myself an idea of where firms stand... As such I'd like to have an accurate idea of how they are compiled.
I was told by an associate at a boutique that M&A league tables for example take into account financing fees in addition to advisory, which is why big balance sheet guys (JP, Citi, BofA) are all up there. In reality they are oftentimes simply there to lend balance sheet. How accurate is this? If so, is there a way to look up advisory fees?
To clarify, this notion would imply that MS/GS/elite boutiques/smaller balance sheet banks are even more dominant in the M&A space than initially seems.
Non voluptas eaque et in. Distinctio ex eligendi ratione quis illo molestiae sit. Amet dolorem aut tenetur consectetur. Quo expedita quisquam vitae voluptatum aut magni possimus vitae.
Consequatur ipsum sit aut dicta quasi sequi. Id corrupti quisquam similique quo ea facilis rerum. Sunt accusantium officia nesciunt dolorem facilis ea quis iusto.
Sunt et fuga et aut quidem. Et quibusdam qui nisi consequatur saepe fugiat qui nemo. Voluptates architecto et qui magni ut repellendus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...