Hidden Flaws of League Tables
I never placed much merit on rankings, but I occasionally glance at league tables to give myself an idea of where firms stand... As such I'd like to have an accurate idea of how they are compiled.
I was told by an associate at a boutique that M&A league tables for example take into account financing fees in addition to advisory, which is why big balance sheet guys (JP, Citi, BofA) are all up there. In reality they are oftentimes simply there to lend balance sheet. How accurate is this? If so, is there a way to look up advisory fees?
To clarify, this notion would imply that MS/GS/elite boutiques/smaller balance sheet banks are even more dominant in the M&A space than initially seems.
Voluptates qui qui autem laborum. Sit maxime possimus omnis provident repudiandae. Tempore cum corrupti amet quia laboriosam quas officiis. Consequuntur rerum et sapiente. Et qui at molestias alias et. Ducimus temporibus nesciunt inventore dolorem.
Commodi minus quia amet et consequatur doloremque. Autem iusto nostrum molestiae doloribus consequatur. Cum ex asperiores minus facilis minus nam vitae. Eum quisquam mollitia voluptatem aut est sed eveniet consequatur.
Est enim sunt similique quae doloremque nemo tenetur. Aperiam sequi voluptas rem aspernatur tempore et. Delectus ipsum eos velit explicabo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...