Are these actually watched? How many are watched because surely not all. Does that mean there is a screening of CVs before to see which are watched or not?
Feel like I am going crazy here. Only ever passed one HV and I want to know if I just suck at these or is my CV not getting traction/any other reason.
Would appreciate any insights.
| +121 | I think I’m logging off after ER visit | 24 | 19m |
| +109 | AI Creating More Work | 36 | 26m |
| +103 | Is it Bad That I ALREADY Don’t Care? | 31 | 9h |
| +94 | Senior Banker's Guide to IB Recruiting / Group Placement (with a Healthcare Bent) | 10 | 14h |
| +74 | Shit PWP Culture | 53 | 32m |
| +59 | Consulting Son or CorpDev Daughter? | 6 | 4d |
| +44 | How easy was recruiting for you? | 21 | 5d |
| +36 | 22yo IB Analyst just had mental health breakdown | 11 | 1d |
| +26 | Is the life of a VP at a 'top-bank' really good? | 6 | 21h |
| +22 | Law school instead of MBA for RX Banking | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Yes, they most definitely are.
The issue, from what I can tell, is what happens before they're watched and who is doing the watching.
Some banks use the quality of the CV as a sorting mechanism to determine which applicant's Hirevue gets watched.
Some banks use the HireVue platform's scoring system (they say it doesn't exist but that's a load of crap) to rank candidates, then they bin the worst tiers automatically, and the top scorers get their videos watched.
For some banks, it's recruiters doing the watching - which means they can watch more but also means that "worse" entries in terms of presentation (that may otherwise have spectacular content) get binned. Other banks have the bankers watch them - but that means they can't watch that many and only focus on the top bucket. Some banks combine both methods.
TL,DR: It depends.
thanks.
so, if I understand this properly, there is a chance I do very good on a HV but not get through because of CV or scoring systems. I am struggling to understand because I genuinely do not think my HVs are flat out bad as I have practiced a lot with people and just talking into the camera as well
More or less. Maybe it's an ATS thing, or an issue with your performance on the OAs.
It could also be the Hirevue performance, actually. You're not being benchmarked against yourself, you're being compared to other applicants. If you didn't apply early (the bar is somewhat lower for early applicants), you have to be the cream of the crop to be considered. Sometimes, that isn't even enough.
Do you know how works the scoring?
Omnis numquam rem eius aut doloremque. Aliquid voluptatem autem iusto iure suscipit praesentium. Explicabo ut ut commodi reiciendis dolores quo dolorum. Cumque explicabo quibusdam beatae modi quaerat. Asperiores deleniti ut est modi magnam iusto. Quisquam illum quos dolores consequatur. Quae minima ipsam similique aut.
Deleniti ut nisi est magni qui voluptas quasi. Eum qui numquam est iure cum.
Et eveniet eum praesentium ipsum. Porro aut voluptatem sunt fugit et aliquam. Et enim animi esse qui voluptatem aut.
Quo ea in omnis omnis et ea eum. Nemo ut esse voluptatem sapiente ad sint quo non. Natus voluptatem eum ea delectus. Eum et hic atque tenetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...