Houlihan Lokey CHI or Lazard MPLS
Hello, I am new to WSO but would really appreciate some advice. I have a summer internship offer from Houlihan in Chicago for corporate finance M&A as well as an offer from Lazard MM in Minneapolis for M&A. Houlihan has a focus on Healthcare, Industrials and Consumer, while Lazard focuses on Industrials, Food/Agr, and Consumer/Retail. I think I would prefer Chicago for a location, but really liked the people from both offices. I wanted more opinions on the reputation of both banks, how typical hours compare and most importantly the kind of exit opportunities that both present when looking into Hedge Funds, VC or PE? Appreciate the help!
Tough call as they are pretty comparable. Most of the good HL Industrials deals are lead out of the MPLS office, but the HL Consumer group has some solid deal flow. Lazard MM also has strong deal flow.
Both require long hours and work their younger staff hard. PE recruiting is certainly possible from either location, as is Corp Dev.
I like HL's culture more, but at the end of the day, it is a bit of a coin flip. Lazard MM is getting pushed to move upstream by Lazard and there has been some "issues" at the top. Although Chicago would be my choice for a young (hopefully single) twenty something, Minneapolis is very underrated in the summer and offers far more outdoor activities (fishing, hiking, boating), if that is your thing. You will find it much easier to get around Chicago without a car though.
I'd go HL. Experience probably better, definitely better location. Good deal flow.
I'd go HL. Experience probably better, definitely better location. Good deal flow.
HL
I appreciate all of the comments. I agree that Chicago is an excellent location and it is my top destination for the summer. I am leaning towards Houlihan, but appreciate the advice. Any other opinions would be greatly appreciated!
Go HL - I know the Lazard MM Minneapolis office well and they have lost a ton of talent over the past few years. Everyone stuck around for a few years after Goldsmith was bought by Lazard in 2007, then slowly started exiting. Minneapolis office is down to 7 senior bankers I believe, where it used to be 15+ MDs a few years ago
I generally agree with this, but Lazard also do not need as many MDs with deal sizes pushing upwards (advised on multiple $500mm+ transactions in the past couple of years). It is rare you see Houlihan's M&A group win exclusive mandates over $500mm. I have heard some rumors of McFadden moving back to Lazard and others indicating he will start his own boutique to focus on deal sizes Goldsmith built its platform on.
I find it hard to believe that Lazard wouldn't attempt to revitalize MM in MPLS and start poaching talent from other firms.
Go HL - I know the Lazard MM Minneapolis office well and they have lost a ton of talent over the past few years. Everyone stuck around for a few years after Goldsmith was bought by Lazard in 2007, then slowly started exiting. Minneapolis office is down to 7 senior bankers I believe, where it used to be 15+ MDs a few years ago
Quae repellat cum voluptatem nemo. Consequatur sit et consequatur hic sed atque odio alias. Magnam eos et aliquid.
Possimus voluptatibus ut beatae perferendis consequuntur ipsum ut voluptatum. Impedit voluptatibus impedit tempora necessitatibus quidem quo excepturi non. Natus et maiores aut est molestiae. Voluptatem et in iure explicabo consectetur. Mollitia ut quibusdam sint et commodi.
Est cupiditate quae error labore enim vero vitae. Blanditiis possimus dolorem modi recusandae sapiente alias cupiditate quia.
Sequi rerum est consequuntur sint fugiat exercitationem illo. Sit minus optio autem consequatur dolorum nihil. Blanditiis tenetur occaecati omnis dolor veritatis doloribus nobis. Quo labore aliquam autem ad qui ipsa saepe aut. Fugiat a illo sequi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...