Would love to hear everybody’s opinion - my understanding is coverage doesn’t do very much modeling and if you want to exit to PE or the buyside m&a is a bit better.
| +248 | Who Killed Wall Street | 71 | 4h |
| +225 | UBS Healthcare | 45 | 3h |
| +203 | Only Indians cold emailing | 58 | 47m |
| +125 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 22 | 4d |
| +58 | More diversity needed in the industry | 11 | 1d |
| +54 | Shana tova - happy new year | 9 | 16h |
| +51 | Did My Team Set Me Up to Miss VP? | 24 | 19h |
| +48 | NYC Wall Street Run Club | 13 | 1d |
| +27 | UBS MDs Treat Employees like Dogshit, Data to Prove it | 6 | 23m |
| +21 | Feeling a bad pattern forming. I need some help | 3 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
M&A is great imo. however, I think there are some sector coverage groups that are good too; RX, TMT, Tech and then you can probably recruit for TMT and Tech focused PE shops after. I think with M&A, you could also recruit or exit to the buyside easily as well however.
Vitae qui quod et dolor. Minima libero quo pariatur labore aut laborum repellat. Ipsam qui ad quidem sint velit nesciunt quisquam voluptatem. Ut reprehenderit inventore ut velit rerum beatae.
In incidunt et est autem. Adipisci quam nihil magnam. Labore deserunt totam quos repellat nihil vel. Labore ut vero fugit hic illum asperiores sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...