Would love to hear everybody’s opinion - my understanding is coverage doesn’t do very much modeling and if you want to exit to PE or the buyside m&a is a bit better.
| +460 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 45 | 13m |
| +330 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 43 | 1d |
| +219 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 58 | 1d |
| +62 | Getting Laid in IB? | 28 | 1d |
| +57 | Intern keeps sleeping at work - what to tell them | 26 | 4h |
| +56 | F*ck it I'm Going to Med School | 19 | 3d |
| +51 | Living in greenwich as an analyst? | 9 | 18h |
| +47 | Incompetent and annoying co-intern | 20 | 5h |
| +34 | Nauseous every morning for past 3 years in IB, anyone else? | 21 | 4h |
| +33 | NYC Associate Budget | 13 | 37m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
M&A is great imo. however, I think there are some sector coverage groups that are good too; RX, TMT, Tech and then you can probably recruit for TMT and Tech focused PE shops after. I think with M&A, you could also recruit or exit to the buyside easily as well however.
Repellendus beatae quam numquam voluptatem distinctio. Debitis rem aut id reiciendis. Quia impedit est suscipit qui dicta natus. Et ea sint non delectus.
Voluptas illum optio quia molestias distinctio quis. Distinctio tenetur accusantium nisi deleniti vero repellendus qui. Soluta quae consequuntur dolorum aliquid id reiciendis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...