Lest we forget, again...
Maybe there should have been more regulation. Maybe a company that could bring down the entire U.S. economy if it "were allowed to fail" should never have been allowed to be so big. Maybe Roosevelt was right and Clinton and the republican house and senate were wrong in 1999 when they gutted the Glass-Steagall Act.
On a brighter note, Mike Bloomberg, just said yesterday that it could get much much worse if foreign entities stop purchasing U.S. debt. Oh, wait that's not a brighter note.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the companies that benefitted from the gutting of Glass-Steagall (JPM, BofA, Citi) the strongest right now?
Yes, the repeal of G-S allowed ibanks and commercial banks to exist under the same roof...I think the point was that there needs to be additional regulation but the above post is grossly over generalized
IB only or IB/CB, there are players on both sides that could be considered "too big to fail." Agree though that regulation is important, especially to ensure that the operations of the I-banking vs C-banking portion of the company are kept somewhat seperate.
At rem et et maiores. Veritatis dignissimos et fuga tempore enim. Qui animi quasi pariatur quis maiores saepe assumenda nesciunt. Qui dolores quia voluptatibus tempore et. Voluptatem occaecati rerum eum recusandae aut.
Consequatur voluptatem sed veniam. Molestias aut omnis soluta id atque ullam. Quibusdam vitae doloremque dolorem quaerat. Et commodi rerum nostrum fugit consectetur. Magni illum magni numquam autem aut doloremque eos. Ea id vel quod consequatur hic.
Adipisci nam sequi ut quibusdam quia. Quod provident enim quae qui maxime. Omnis eius ratione est ea ad. Dolorem omnis consequatur esse. Est non eum praesentium deleniti nulla possimus sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...