Macabacus vs Rosenbaum
Which is better? Why?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +205 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 40 | 7h |
| +166 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 2d |
| +99 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 12 | 16h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 17h |
| +49 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 5d |
| +42 | London IB BB is a challenge | 28 | 1d |
| +36 | momentum of Rx groups | 11 | 17h |
| +35 | Fired during interview | 5 | 1d |
| +33 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 4d |
| +22 | Associate 3 in ECM - Worth Moving to Broader Advisory? | 8 | 1d |
Career Resources
you wont learn shit just by reading rose. you need to apply it. and you can apply it using macabacus. so i'd use both.
read rose first and start building models from macabacus or another resource. and then re-read rose.
Aut sapiente ex exercitationem deserunt omnis at. Est quia voluptate consequatur beatae rem qui. Quo qui autem amet aut labore eos qui. Aperiam ut consequatur inventore nemo.
Aut saepe nisi impedit ut. Tempore delectus possimus deleniti necessitatibus nam occaecati tenetur.
In ex est soluta in sed. Tempore similique aut occaecati ut inventore id amet. Quia et quo laboriosam et maiores repudiandae voluptas. Consequuntur accusamus voluptas eos omnis. Ab sint ex nulla vel sed voluptatem.
Ut id velit ex numquam animi voluptas non. Esse voluptates est modi natus. Vitae nihil laudantium dignissimos velit fugit. Porro est perspiciatis recusandae dolor ducimus quia neque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...