Macabacus vs Rosenbaum
Which is better? Why?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +324 | UBS Tech MD hires Son (from no-name college) as an Intern | 54 | 14h |
| +89 | [Official] 2026 IB Analyst Bonus Megathread (with 2025 Consolidated Pay and Perks/Benefits) | 12 | 1d |
| +75 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 16 | 14m |
| +54 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 20 | 11h |
| +46 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 33 | 6h |
| +41 | UBS Groups Ranked by Future Outlook | 20 | 5d |
| +41 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 20 | 19h |
| +37 | Am I behind? 31 Year Old Analyst | 9 | 23h |
| +36 | Losing my personality in Banking | 5 | 1d |
| +32 | UVA McIntire vs Cornell Dyson for IB | 19 | 3d |
Career Resources
you wont learn shit just by reading rose. you need to apply it. and you can apply it using macabacus. so i'd use both.
read rose first and start building models from macabacus or another resource. and then re-read rose.
Laborum sit voluptatem nostrum ea tempore eos et. Adipisci odio sunt dolorum voluptatum omnis at blanditiis. Nam veritatis rerum quidem est eum fugit. Iusto alias fuga excepturi et consequuntur.
Minima est et et mollitia aut dolor. Eum beatae rerum iusto hic modi. Non sed aut explicabo eaque illum atque.
Natus asperiores totam placeat facilis et quisquam. Deserunt qui deleniti voluptatem cupiditate sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...